Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile.

Pablo A González, Laura L Gutiérrez, Juan Carlos Oyanedel, Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez
Author Information
  1. Pablo A González: Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. ORCID
  2. Laura L Gutiérrez: Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  3. Juan Carlos Oyanedel: Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
  4. Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez: Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

Abstract

This article presents an exploratory model to classify public attitudes towards health systems financing and organization. It comprises 5 factors (pay-as-you-use, solidarity, willingness to contribute, mixed financing, and public provision) measured by 17 indicators, selected through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) applied to a sample of Chilean adults. Based on this model, cluster analysis proposed 2 groups: "Taxes-public" and "Insurance-choice," representing 47% and 53% of interviewees, respectively. The results show differences between groups concerning the evaluation of both health care providers and insurers. The second cluster tends to evaluate them more harshly, showing less willingness to contribute further, less solidarity, more agreement with the current financing arrangement in terms of the mixture and its insurance (as opposed to purchasing of service based on health problems), and more support for choice of provider. These results highlight the need to consider people's attitudes in the public discussion of health systems financing.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Expect. 2002 Jun;5(2):148-55 [PMID: 12031055]
  2. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):849-856 [PMID: 19030690]
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):1005 [PMID: 33143718]
  4. S Afr Med J. 2006 Sep;96(9):814-8 [PMID: 17068652]
  5. Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):917-23 [PMID: 22959388]
  6. Salud Publica Mex. 2006 Nov-Dec;48(6):512-21 [PMID: 17326348]
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jun 1;92(6):389 [PMID: 24940009]
  8. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):478-80 [PMID: 20539870]
  9. Croat Med J. 2002 Aug;43(4):417-24 [PMID: 12187519]
  10. Med Care. 1975 Aug;13(8):659-68 [PMID: 1152556]
  11. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 May-Jun;18(3):206-16 [PMID: 10388217]
  12. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):346-369 [PMID: 30238495]
  13. Medwave. 2020 Jul 15;20(6):e7958 [PMID: 32678813]
  14. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Nov 1;90(11):867-8 [PMID: 23226900]
  15. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2000 Jul-Aug;8(1-2):99-104 [PMID: 11026779]
  16. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):857-63 [PMID: 19030691]
  17. J Health Soc Behav. 2008 Dec;49(4):385-99 [PMID: 19181045]
  18. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2002 Mar;2(1):25-36 [PMID: 14625906]
  19. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):402 [PMID: 20539847]
  20. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):839-848 [PMID: 19030689]
  21. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Feb 1;89(2):153-6 [PMID: 21346927]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attitude
Chile
Government Programs
Humans
Insurance Carriers
Medical Assistance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthfinancingpublicsystemsmodelattitudessolidaritywillingnesscontributeclusterresultslessChilearticlepresentsexploratoryclassifytowardsorganizationcomprises5factorspay-as-you-usemixedprovisionmeasured17indicatorsselectedExploratoryStructuralEquationModelingESEMappliedsampleChileanadultsBasedanalysisproposed2groups:"Taxes-public""Insurance-choice"representing47%53%intervieweesrespectivelyshowdifferencesgroupsconcerningevaluationcareprovidersinsurerssecondtendsevaluateharshlyshowingagreementcurrentarrangementtermsmixtureinsuranceopposedpurchasingservicebasedproblemssupportchoiceproviderhighlightneedconsiderpeople'sdiscussionAttitudestowardHealthSystemsFinancingopinionsurvey

Similar Articles

Cited By