Identification of Arrhythmia by Using a Decision Tree and Gated Network Fusion Model.

Peng Lu, Yabin Zhang, Bing Zhou, Hongpo Zhang, Liwei Chen, Yusong Lin, Xiaobo Mao, Yang Gao, Hao Xi
Author Information
  1. Peng Lu: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. ORCID
  2. Yabin Zhang: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. ORCID
  3. Bing Zhou: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. ORCID
  4. Hongpo Zhang: Collaborative Innovation Center of Internet Healthcare, Zhengzhou 450052, China. ORCID
  5. Liwei Chen: Department of Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
  6. Yusong Lin: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
  7. Xiaobo Mao: Department of Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
  8. Yang Gao: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. ORCID
  9. Hao Xi: School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. ORCID

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning (DNN) based methods have made leapfrogging level breakthroughs in detecting cardiac arrhythmias as the cost effectiveness of arithmetic power, and data size has broken through the tipping point. However, the inability of these methods to provide a basis for modeling decisions limits clinicians' confidence on such methods. In this paper, a Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) and decision tree fusion model, referred to as (T-GRU), was designed to explore the problem of Arrhythmia recognition and to improve the credibility of deep learning methods. The fusion model multipathway processing time-frequency domain featured the introduction of decision tree probability analysis of frequency domain features, the regularization of GRU model parameters and weight control to improve the decision tree model output weights. The MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database was used for validation. Results showed that the low-frequency band features dominated the model prediction. The fusion model had an accuracy of 98.31%, sensitivity of 96.85%, specificity of 98.81%, and precision of 96.73%, indicating its high reliability and clinical significance.

References

  1. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Sep 17;2014:178436 [PMID: 27350985]
  2. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:27-31 [PMID: 27372039]
  3. Comput Biol Med. 2017 Oct 1;89:389-396 [PMID: 28869899]
  4. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-69 [PMID: 30617320]
  5. J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 13;2019:6320651 [PMID: 31737240]
  6. Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80 [PMID: 9377276]
  7. Physiol Meas. 2019 Jun 04;40(5):054009 [PMID: 30943458]
  8. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Mar;63(3):664-75 [PMID: 26285054]
  9. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:1500-1503 [PMID: 31946178]
  10. Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67 [PMID: 32607472]
  11. Comput Biol Med. 2019 Oct;113:103387 [PMID: 31421276]
  12. J Med Syst. 2016 Apr;40(4):108 [PMID: 26922592]
  13. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jun 21;2020:7141725 [PMID: 32685521]
  14. Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jun;106:101856 [PMID: 32593390]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Computational Biology
Databases, Factual
Decision Trees
Deep Learning
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Electrocardiography
Humans
Models, Cardiovascular
Neural Networks, Computer
Wavelet Analysis
Wearable Electronic Devices

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelmethodsdecisiontreefusiondeeplearningGRUarrhythmiaimprovedomainfeatures9896recentyearsDNNbasedmadeleapfrogginglevelbreakthroughsdetectingcardiacarrhythmiascosteffectivenessarithmeticpowerdatasizebrokentippingpointHoweverinabilityprovidebasismodelingdecisionslimitsclinicians'confidencepaperGateRecurrentUnitreferredT-GRUdesignedexploreproblemrecognitioncredibilitymultipathwayprocessingtime-frequencyfeaturedintroductionprobabilityanalysisfrequencyregularizationparametersweightcontroloutputweightsMIT-BIHdatabaseusedvalidationResultsshowedlow-frequencybanddominatedpredictionaccuracy31%sensitivity85%specificity81%precision73%indicatinghighreliabilityclinicalsignificanceIdentificationArrhythmiaUsingDecisionTreeGatedNetworkFusionModel

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)