Optimization of the antifungal metabolite production in isolated from northern forests soils in Iran.

Maryam Azish, Masoomeh Shams Ghahfarokhi, Mehdi Razzaghi Abyaneh
Author Information
  1. Maryam Azish: Department of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Masoomeh Shams Ghahfarokhi: Department of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Mehdi Razzaghi Abyaneh: Department of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Soil bacteria have extreme population diversity among natural sources and are able to produce a wide array of antifungal metabolites. This study aimed to isolate and identify the bioactive metabolite-producing bacteria from forest soils and evaluate their antimicrobial potent against some pathogenic organisms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, soil samples were screened for antifungal activity against on glucose-yeast extract (GY) agar using a visual agar plate assay method. All growing bacteria were examined for antifungal activity, and antagonistic bacteria were identified based on 16S ribosomal RNA sequence analysis. For optimization of the production of antifungal bioactive metabolites, inhibitory bacteria were cultured on different culture conditions, including media, pH, temperature, and incubation time.
RESULTS: In total, 110 bacterial strains were isolated from the forest soils and four species with high antifungal activity were identified as and spp. on the basis of 16s ribosomal RNA sequencing. Dichloromethane extract of the starch casein broth culture filtrate of the S. libani (incubated at 30° C for five days) showed strong antifungal activity against and .
CONCLUSION: Based on the results, forest soils contain organisms with antifungal activity and could be considered as a good source for novel antifungal metabolites as effective and safe therapeutics.

Keywords

References

  1. J Mycol Med. 2014 Jun;24(2):e57-64 [PMID: 24746720]
  2. Extremophiles. 2016 Jan;20(1):79-90 [PMID: 26515082]
  3. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Jan;9(1):15-32 [PMID: 12691539]
  4. Iran J Microbiol. 2011 Sep;3(3):140-6 [PMID: 22347597]
  5. J Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 15;216(suppl_3):S436-S444 [PMID: 28911045]
  6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Oct;56(10):5180-5 [PMID: 22825124]
  7. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;162(2):579-93 [PMID: 19842066]
  8. J Mycol Med. 2018 Mar;28(1):150-160 [PMID: 29158025]
  9. Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 26;10:302 [PMID: 30873135]
  10. Bioimpacts. 2018;8(4):253-261 [PMID: 30397580]
  11. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;179(5):830-45 [PMID: 26945577]
  12. AMB Express. 2017 Dec;7(1):54 [PMID: 28255861]
  13. Can J Microbiol. 2018 Jul;64(7):439-453 [PMID: 29586541]
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(4):521-3 [PMID: 23667265]
  15. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 May;26(4):758-766 [PMID: 31049001]
  16. Int J Genomics. 2014;2014:123058 [PMID: 25184130]
  17. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;1(3):85-105 [PMID: 25165546]
  18. Extremophiles. 2018 Jan;22(1):87-98 [PMID: 29134389]
  19. J Mycol Med. 2014 Jun;24(2):e17-23 [PMID: 24139182]
  20. J Fungi (Basel). 2016 Jul 04;2(3): [PMID: 29376938]
  21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1087-93 [PMID: 26602694]
  22. Microbiol Res. 2012 Dec 20;167(10):571-80 [PMID: 22796410]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2017 Apr 03;8:550 [PMID: 28421050]
  24. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jan;18(1):44-69 [PMID: 15653818]
  25. Front Microbiol. 2016 Mar 18;7:347 [PMID: 27047463]
  26. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;10(2):296-322 [PMID: 27273822]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0antifungalbacteriaactivitysoilsmetabolitesforestANDSoilstudybioactiveorganismsextractagaridentifiedribosomalRNAproductioncultureisolatedspplibanimetaboliteBACKGROUNDPURPOSE:extremepopulationdiversityamongnaturalsourcesableproducewidearrayaimedisolateidentifymetabolite-producingevaluateantimicrobialpotentpathogenicMATERIALSMETHODS:soilsamplesscreened forglucose-yeastGYusingvisualplateassaymethodgrowingexaminedantagonisticbased16SsequenceanalysisoptimizationinhibitorycultureddifferentconditionsincludingmediapHtemperatureincubationtimeRESULTS:total110bacterialstrainsfourspecieshighbasis16ssequencingDichloromethanestarchcaseinbrothfiltrateSincubated30°CfivedaysshowedstrongCONCLUSION:BasedresultscontainconsideredgoodsourcenoveleffectivesafetherapeuticsOptimizationnorthernforestsIranAntifungalAspergillusStreptomyces

Similar Articles

Cited By