Use of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis to Determine the Source of Methicillin-Resistant Bacteremia.

Eugene Y H Yeung, Ivan Gorn
Author Information
  1. Eugene Y H Yeung: Department of Medical Microbiology, The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
  2. Ivan Gorn: The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has historically been considered the gold standard in fingerprinting bacterial strains in epidemiological studies and outbreak investigations; little is known regarding its use in individual clinical cases. The current study detailed two clinical cases in which PFGE helped to determine the source of their methicillin-resistant (MRSA) bacteremia. Patient A was found to have MRSA bacteremia after trauma in her pelvic area. MRSA was also found in her groin but not in her nostril and rectum. PFGE was performed that showed variable bands of her MRSA isolates from blood and groin, suggestive of different strains of MRSA. Her MRSA bacteremia was determined to be unrelated to her pelvic trauma. Patient B was found to have MRSA bacteremia after colonoscopy. MRSA was also found in his nostril and rectum. PFGE was performed that showed variable bands of his MRSA isolates from blood and rectum but identical bands of MRSA isolates from his blood and nostril. His MRSA bacteremia was determined to be unrelated to his colonoscopy procedure. The current study demonstrates the use of PFGE to rule out the source of bacteremia in individual clinical cases.

Keywords

References

  1. Emerg Med Int. 2020 Apr 6;2020:9217949 [PMID: 32322423]
  2. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2013 Aug;24(8):1185-93 [PMID: 23686278]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):603-6 [PMID: 23175257]
  4. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 15;61(6):e26-46 [PMID: 26229122]
  5. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;36(7):777-85 [PMID: 25998499]
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Apr;53(4):1072-9 [PMID: 25631811]
  7. Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(1):86-7 [PMID: 24982790]
  8. CMAJ. 2019 Sep 3;191(35):E967 [PMID: 31481425]
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2233-9 [PMID: 7494007]
  10. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:425-44 [PMID: 26488280]
  11. J Infect Dis. 1999 May;179(5):1157-61 [PMID: 10191218]
  12. J Hosp Infect. 2001 Feb;47(2):98-103 [PMID: 11170772]
  13. Circulation. 2015 Oct 13;132(15):1435-86 [PMID: 26373316]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Mar 11;156(5):572-4 [PMID: 8604964]
  15. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):285-92 [PMID: 24521595]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 1;68(4):545-553 [PMID: 30107401]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAbacteremiaPFGEfoundclinicalcasessourcetraumapelvicnostrilrectumbandsisolatesbloodcolonoscopygelelectrophoresisstrainsuseindividualcurrentstudymethicillin-resistantPatientalsogroinperformedshowedvariabledeterminedunrelatedPulsed-fieldhistoricallyconsideredgoldstandardfingerprintingbacterialepidemiologicalstudiesoutbreakinvestigationslittleknownregardingdetailedtwohelpeddetermineareasuggestivedifferentBidenticalproceduredemonstratesruleUsePulsed-FieldGelElectrophoresisDetermineSourceMethicillin-ResistantBacteremiaclonalityStaphylococcusaureusmolecularmicrobiologypulsed-fieldscreeningcontrolinfection

Similar Articles

Cited By