Psychometric Evaluation of Social Cognition and Behavior Measures in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome.

Emily K Schworer, Emily K Hoffman, Anna J Esbensen
Author Information
  1. Emily K Schworer: Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
  2. Emily K Hoffman: Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
  3. Anna J Esbensen: Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

Abstract

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) are often described as socially engaged; however, challenges with social cognition, expressive language, and social interaction are also common in DS and are prospective outcomes of interest for clinical trials. The current study evaluates the psychometric properties of standardized measurements of social cognition and social behavior for potential use as outcome measures for children and adolescents with DS. Seventy-three youth ages 6 to 17 years old (M = 12.67, SD = 3.16) with DS were assessed on social cognition subtests of a neuropsychological assessment at two time points. Caregivers also completed a parent-report measure of social behavior. Measures were evaluated for feasibility, test-retest reliability, practice effects, convergent validity, and associations with broader developmental domains (i.e., age, cognition, and language). All social cognition and behavior measures met criteria for a portion of the psychometric indices evaluated, yet feasibility limitations were identified for the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition (NEPSY-II) Affect Recognition subtest, and the NEPSY-II Theory of Mind subtest had problematic floor effects for percentile ranks. The Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2; T-scores) had high feasibility, moderate to excellent test-retest reliability, and no practice effects, suggesting this measure could be appropriate for use in clinical trials involving youth with DS.

Keywords

References

  1. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):113-34 [PMID: 19874447]
  2. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jul-Aug;49(4):498-507 [PMID: 24888967]
  3. Autism Res. 2018 Mar;11(3):503-508 [PMID: 29282895]
  4. Child Neuropsychol. 2021 May 2;:1-19 [PMID: 33938385]
  5. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020 Apr;41(3):172-179 [PMID: 31599791]
  6. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 May;49(Pt 5):372-8 [PMID: 15817054]
  7. Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Sep;110(5):378-92 [PMID: 16080776]
  8. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):553-7 [PMID: 24963529]
  9. Occup Ther Health Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):7-25 [PMID: 23898980]
  10. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2001 Oct;7(1):9-15 [PMID: 11706811]
  11. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007 Jul;51(Pt 7):551-63 [PMID: 17537169]
  12. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 May;122(3):247-281 [PMID: 28452584]
  13. J Neurodev Disord. 2015;7(1):5 [PMID: 25657824]
  14. Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):737-748 [PMID: 28981848]
  15. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Feb;48(Pt 2):150-9 [PMID: 14723657]
  16. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2008 Jan;21(1):48-57 [PMID: 26246797]
  17. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2020 Jan-Dec;5: [PMID: 34179506]
  18. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6(1):16 [PMID: 26491488]
  19. Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 23;8:1035 [PMID: 28690570]
  20. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Apr;44(4):846-59 [PMID: 24005986]
  21. Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Jul;110(4):312-22 [PMID: 15941367]
  22. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010 Apr;31(3):181-91 [PMID: 20375732]
  23. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):494-504 [PMID: 25943125]
  24. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Mar 25;: [PMID: 33763953]
  25. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  26. Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1007-22 [PMID: 19297130]
  27. J Neurodev Disord. 2016 Sep 06;8(1):35 [PMID: 27602170]
  28. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Dec;152A(12):3028-35 [PMID: 21108390]

Grants

  1. R01 HD093754/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialcognitionDSbehaviorfeasibilityeffectssyndromelanguagealsoclinicaltrialspsychometricusemeasureschildrenyouth=measureMeasuresevaluatedtest-retestreliabilitypracticeSecondEditionNEPSY-IIsubtestSocialIndividualsoftendescribedsociallyengagedhoweverchallengesexpressiveinteractioncommonprospectiveoutcomesinterestcurrentstudyevaluatespropertiesstandardizedmeasurementspotentialoutcomeadolescentsSeventy-threeages617yearsoldM1267SD316assessedsubtestsneuropsychologicalassessmenttwotimepointsCaregiverscompletedparent-reportconvergentvalidityassociationsbroaderdevelopmentaldomainsieagemetcriteriaportionindicesyetlimitationsidentifiedDevelopmentalNeuropsychologicalAssessmentAffectRecognitionTheoryMindproblematicfloorpercentileranksResponsivenessScaleSRS-2T-scoreshighmoderateexcellentsuggestingappropriateinvolvingPsychometricEvaluationCognitionBehaviorChildrenAdolescentsSyndromeDownmeasurement

Similar Articles

Cited By