Overview of the Genetic Diversity of African (Termitidae: Macrotermitinae) and Implications for Taxonomy, Ecology and Food Science.

Bronwyn Egan, Zwannda Nethavhani, Barbara van Asch
Author Information
  1. Bronwyn Egan: Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Mankweng 0727, South Africa.
  2. Zwannda Nethavhani: Department of Genetics, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
  3. Barbara van Asch: Department of Genetics, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

Abstract

termites play important ecological roles and are consumed by many communities as a delicacy and dietary complement throughout Africa. However, lack of reliable morphological characters has hampered studies of diversity in a wide range of scientific fields including ecology, phylogenetics and food science. In order to place our preliminary assessment of the diversity of in South Africa in context, we analysed a comprehensive dataset of COI sequences for African species including new and publicly available data. Phylogenetic reconstruction and estimates of genetic divergence showed a high level of incongruity between species names and genetic groups, as well as several instances of cryptic diversity. We identified three main clades and 17 genetic groups in the dataset. We propose that this structure be used as a background for future surveys of diversity in Africa, thus mitigating the negative impact of the present taxonomic uncertainties in the genus. The new specimens collected in Limpopo fell into four distinct genetic groups, suggesting that the region harbours remarkable diversity relative to other African regions surveyed in previous studies. This work shows that African have been understudied across the continent, and that the genus contains cryptic diversity undetectable by classic taxonomy. Furthermore, these results may inform future taxonomic revisions in , thus contributing to advances in termitology.

Keywords

References

  1. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015 Apr 30;11:29 [PMID: 25925503]
  2. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80 [PMID: 23329690]
  3. J Chem Ecol. 2009 May;35(5):572-9 [PMID: 19399557]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):14887-92 [PMID: 12386341]
  5. Insects. 2020 Dec 31;12(1): [PMID: 33396313]
  6. Mol Ecol. 2011 Jun;20(12):2619-27 [PMID: 21481052]
  7. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Jan 26;13(1):8 [PMID: 28126033]
  8. Insects. 2019 Jan 16;10(1): [PMID: 30654506]
  9. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Sep 14;14(1):59 [PMID: 30217159]
  10. Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;34(9):2422-2424 [PMID: 28472384]
  11. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Nov;13(6):969-75 [PMID: 23280099]
  12. Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21 [PMID: 20525638]
  13. J Econ Entomol. 2017 Dec 5;110(6):2637-2646 [PMID: 29045665]
  14. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549 [PMID: 29722887]
  15. Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302 [PMID: 29029172]
  16. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20 [PMID: 7463489]
  17. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 May;27(3):1728-9 [PMID: 25259453]
  18. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Dec;61(3):964-9 [PMID: 21896335]
  19. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 1;10(1):8893 [PMID: 32483282]
  20. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Jul;10(4):615-27 [PMID: 21565066]
  21. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2017 Apr 3;2017(4):pdb.prot093450 [PMID: 28373491]
  22. Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Mar 1;34(3):589-597 [PMID: 28025274]
  23. Curr Biol. 2005 May 10;15(9):851-5 [PMID: 15886104]
  24. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct;45(1):239-50 [PMID: 17714956]
  25. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):1250 [PMID: 31988373]
  26. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9 [PMID: 7881515]
  27. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Feb 1;144:632-642 [PMID: 31830455]
  28. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):359-65 [PMID: 19828546]
  29. Syst Biol. 2006 Aug;55(4):539-52 [PMID: 16785212]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diversitygeneticAfricanAfricaspeciesgroupscryptictermitesstudiesincludingdatasetnewdivergencefuturethustaxonomicgenusplayimportantecologicalrolesconsumedmanycommunitiesdelicacydietarycomplementthroughoutHoweverlackreliablemorphologicalcharactershamperedwiderangescientificfieldsecologyphylogeneticsfoodscienceorderplacepreliminaryassessmentSouthcontextanalysedcomprehensiveCOIsequencespubliclyavailabledataPhylogeneticreconstructionestimatesshowedhighlevelincongruitynameswellseveralinstancesidentifiedthreemainclades17proposestructureusedbackgroundsurveysmitigatingnegativeimpactpresentuncertaintiesspecimenscollectedLimpopofellfourdistinctsuggestingregionharboursremarkablerelativeregionssurveyedpreviousworkshowsunderstudiedacrosscontinentcontainsundetectableclassictaxonomyFurthermoreresultsmayinformrevisionscontributingadvancestermitologyOverviewGeneticDiversityTermitidae:MacrotermitinaeImplicationsTaxonomyEcologyFoodSciencemitochondrialmarkers

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)