Infection in Red Foxes in France.

Lorraine Michelet, Céline Richomme, Edouard Réveillaud, Krystel De Cruz, Jean-Louis Moyen, Maria Laura Boschiroli
Author Information
  1. Lorraine Michelet: Paris-Est University, National Reference Laboratory for Tuberculosis, Animal Health Laboratory, Anses, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. ORCID
  2. Céline Richomme: Anses, Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, 54220 Malzéville, France. ORCID
  3. Edouard Réveillaud: Regional Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Forest of Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 87000 Limoges, France.
  4. Krystel De Cruz: Paris-Est University, National Reference Laboratory for Tuberculosis, Animal Health Laboratory, Anses, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.
  5. Jean-Louis Moyen: Laboratoire Départemental d'Analyse et de Recherche de la Dordogne, 24660 Coulounieix-Chamiers, France. ORCID
  6. Maria Laura Boschiroli: Paris-Est University, National Reference Laboratory for Tuberculosis, Animal Health Laboratory, Anses, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. ORCID

Abstract

, member of the , complex is known to interfere in the screening and diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. This pathogen is increasingly detected in the frame of surveillance programs for tuberculosis in livestock and wildlife. Recently, red foxes () were found infected by in four French endemic areas. infection was concomitantly found during this investigation. Rates of infection by and are not different except in one of the four areas (lower prevalence for in Charente). As for infection, none of the infected foxes presented gross TB-like lesions. Infection of red foxes by seems to occur by ingestion of contaminated food, as mesenteric lymph nodes are mostly infected albeit no fecal excretion could be detected. Red foxes appear to be susceptible to infection but seem to play a role of dead-end host for the transmission of this bacillus.

Keywords

References

  1. Parasitology. 2008 Mar;135(3):309-17 [PMID: 18005472]
  2. BMC Vet Res. 2019 Dec 6;15(1):445 [PMID: 31810466]
  3. Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 24;8(12): [PMID: 33255311]
  4. Vet Microbiol. 2016 Apr 15;186:1-7 [PMID: 27016750]
  5. Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Jun;12(4):873-6 [PMID: 21855653]
  6. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54253 [PMID: 23349839]
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Aug;52(8):2834-43 [PMID: 24871212]
  8. Vet Rec. 2015 Oct 31;177(17):446 [PMID: 26515352]
  9. Vet Pathol. 2014 Sep;51(5):903-14 [PMID: 24334995]
  10. J Med Microbiol. 2010 Mar;59(Pt 3):285-294 [PMID: 19959631]
  11. Vet Rec. 2017 Apr 29;180(17):429 [PMID: 28450491]
  12. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Mar;22(3):569-70 [PMID: 26890061]
  13. Front Vet Sci. 2020 Dec 03;7:590037 [PMID: 33344530]
  14. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 2011 Jul;56(3):209-218 [PMID: 21765531]
  15. J Med Microbiol. 2010 Aug;59(Pt 8):984-989 [PMID: 20488936]
  16. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Aug;47(8):2551-9 [PMID: 19535520]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Mar;53(3):981-5 [PMID: 25540404]
  18. J Feline Med Surg. 2011 Dec;13(12):934-44 [PMID: 22079343]
  19. Front Vet Sci. 2018 Oct 30;5:262 [PMID: 30430112]
  20. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;25(11):2152-2154 [PMID: 31625855]
  21. Microorganisms. 2020 Jul 17;8(7): [PMID: 32709124]
  22. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Sep;40(9):3281-5 [PMID: 12202566]

Grants

  1. 2017-326/Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foxesinfectiontuberculosisredinfectedbovinedetectedfoundfourareasInfectionRedmembercomplexknowninterferescreeningdiagnosispathogenincreasinglyframesurveillanceprogramslivestockwildlifeRecentlyFrenchendemicconcomitantlyinvestigationRatesdifferentexceptonelowerprevalenceCharentenonepresentedgrossTB-likelesionsseemsoccuringestioncontaminatedfoodmesentericlymphnodesmostlyalbeitfecalexcretionappearsusceptibleseemplayroledead-endhosttransmissionbacillusFoxesFranceMycobacteriummicroticross-sectionalstudyfox

Similar Articles

Cited By