The urgent need for more basic research on SARS-Cov2 infection and vaccines in assessing potential psychoneurological effects using maternal immune activation (MIA) and other preclinical modeling.

William J Murphy
Author Information
  1. William J Murphy: Departments of Dermatology and Internal Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States. Electronic address: wmjmurphy@ucdavis.edu.

Abstract

The rapid development and application of different SARS-Cov2 vaccines world-wide has resulted in impressive efficacy and protection from this deadly pandemic. However, the existence of different and continuously developing vaccine candidates coupled with the likelihood of continued application due to both waning immune responses and emergence of viral mutants, means that more basic research regarding their efficacy and continued application are needed. This is particularly true with use of preclinical models involving effects when given during pregnancy. The substantial body of data on the impact of maternal immune activation (MIA) on neurologic development and behavior in the progeny necessitates the need to have all vaccine candidates, particularly when inducing strong toll receptor (TLR) responses, involving these models. Use of other preclinical models involving autoimmunity and allergy coupled with incorporation of human modifying variables of aging and obesity should also be applied to better reflect the heterogeneity of the general population and potential off-target effects that may arise. Additionally, the use of human ACE2 receptor transgenic mouse models can shed insights given the differential tissues expression at different stages in development. However, to foster these types of basic research studies involving different vaccine products, initiatives must first be implemented and supported at the governmental level even while clinical data still accumulates.

Keywords

References

  1. Immunity. 2005 Aug;23(2):165-75 [PMID: 16111635]
  2. Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 16;11(1):5236 [PMID: 33067431]
  3. Med (N Y). 2021 May 14;2(5):591-610.e10 [PMID: 33969332]
  4. J Biol Chem. 2007 Aug 24;282(34):24759-66 [PMID: 17573354]
  5. Aging Cell. 2020 Jul;19(7): [PMID: 32558150]
  6. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 15;75(4):332-41 [PMID: 24011823]
  7. Elife. 2021 Dec 06;10: [PMID: 34866574]
  8. J Exp Med. 2013 Oct 21;210(11):2223-37 [PMID: 24081947]
  9. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1833 [PMID: 23673618]
  10. Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;25(10):2330-2341 [PMID: 30610201]
  11. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:619-630 [PMID: 32335198]
  12. iScience. 2021 Dec 17;24(12):103479 [PMID: 34841223]
  13. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;81(5):391-401 [PMID: 28137374]
  14. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Jun;21(6):395-404 [PMID: 33927374]
  15. J Immunother Cancer. 2016 Dec 20;4:88 [PMID: 28031818]

MeSH Term

Animals
COVID-19
Female
Humans
Mice
Pandemics
Pregnancy
RNA, Viral
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccines

Chemicals

RNA, Viral
Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0differentmodelsinvolvingdevelopmentapplicationSARS-Cov2vaccineimmunebasicresearchpreclinicaleffectsvaccinesefficacyHowevercandidatescoupledcontinuedresponsesparticularlyusegivendatamaternalactivationMIAneedreceptorhumanpotentialrapidworld-wideresultedimpressiveprotectiondeadlypandemicexistencecontinuouslydevelopinglikelihoodduewaningemergenceviralmutantsmeansregardingneededtruepregnancysubstantialbodyimpactneurologicbehaviorprogenynecessitatesinducingstrongtollTLRUseautoimmunityallergyincorporationmodifyingvariablesagingobesityalsoappliedbetterreflectheterogeneitygeneralpopulationoff-targetmayariseAdditionallyACE2transgenicmousecanshedinsightsdifferentialtissuesexpressionstagesfostertypesstudiesproductsinitiativesmustfirstimplementedsupportedgovernmentallevelevenclinicalstillaccumulatesurgentinfectionassessingpsychoneurologicalusingmodelingMaternalImmuneActivationPreclinicalTestingVaccines

Similar Articles

Cited By