Anti-CD22 CAR-T Cell Therapy as a Salvage Treatment in B Cell Malignancies Refractory or Relapsed After Anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy.

Haibo Zhu, Haobin Deng, Juan Mu, Cuicui Lyu, Yanyu Jiang, Qi Deng
Author Information
  1. Haibo Zhu: Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  2. Haobin Deng: The First Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  3. Juan Mu: Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  4. Cuicui Lyu: Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  5. Yanyu Jiang: Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  6. Qi Deng: Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To observe efficacy of the anti-CD22 chimeric antigen receptor modified (anti-CD22-CAR) T cell salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B cell acute lymphoid leukemia (B-ALL) patients whose disease did not reach CR or progressed again after anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy.
METHODS: In our study, seven R/R DLBCL patients reached stable disease (SD) or progression of disease (PD) after their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy. Only three in all the six R/R B-ALL patients obtained complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (Cri) in their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy, but they relapsed again in the following three, six and one months. Then, all these thirteen R/R DLBCL and B-ALL patients received anti-CD22 CAR-T cell salvage therapy because their disease did not reach CR or progressed again.
RESULTS: Four R/R DLBCL patients obtained CR, while two R/R DLBCL patients achieved PR and one patient achieved SD. But only two R/R B-ALL patients obtained Cri in their anti-CD22 CAR-T cell salvage therapy. The overall survival (OS) of R/R DLBCL patients after the anti-CD22 CAR-T cell therapy was 6.142±3.395 months until August 31, 2020. There was no different of the median expansion peaks of the two kinds of CAR T cells (=0.920). The time of anti-CD22-CAR T cell proportion peak days was later than that of the time of anti-CD19-CAR T cell peak days post infusion (=0.022). Their cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded 2-4 in their anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy, while the notable CRS was graded 1-2 in their anti-CD22-CAR T cell therapy. But there was no difference in the CRS and the immune effect or cell associated neurotoxic syndrome (ICANS) grades in the two kinds of therapies. And there was no difference in the hematological toxicity grades in the two kinds of therapies.
CONCLUSION: The anti-CD22-CAR T cell salvage therapy is highly effective in R/R DLBCL patients than in R/R B-ALL patients who failed in anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy before. We need to expand the number of R/R DLBCL or B-ALL patients and continue to observe.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-ONN-16009862 and ChiCTR1800019298.

Keywords

References

  1. Blood. 2014 Jul 10;124(2):188-95 [PMID: 24876563]
  2. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra25 [PMID: 24553386]
  3. Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 2;8(1):764 [PMID: 28970495]
  4. Cancer Sci. 2012 May;103(5):933-8 [PMID: 22335424]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68 [PMID: 25113753]
  6. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42 [PMID: 30518502]
  7. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019 Apr 26;37:145-171 [PMID: 30526160]
  8. Nat Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):20-28 [PMID: 29155426]
  9. Immunol Invest. 2006;35(1):93-114 [PMID: 16531332]
  10. Leukemia. 2019 Dec;33(12):2854-2866 [PMID: 31110217]
  11. Oncoimmunology. 2015 May 26;4(11):e1027469 [PMID: 26451310]
  12. Blood Adv. 2019 Jul 23;3(14):2230-2236 [PMID: 31332046]
  13. Semin Oncol. 2002 Feb;29(1 Suppl 2):81-6 [PMID: 11842393]
  14. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-638 [PMID: 30592986]
  15. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Jun;4(6):498-508 [PMID: 27059623]
  16. Oncol Lett. 2019 Nov;18(5):4415-4420 [PMID: 31611950]
  17. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2018 Nov 06;11:127-137 [PMID: 30581986]
  18. J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Jun 11;12(1):59 [PMID: 31186046]
  19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Oct;14(10):653-66 [PMID: 25234143]
  20. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Nov 21;7(1):315 [PMID: 31753002]
  21. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 1;25(17):5188-5190 [PMID: 31266831]
  22. Cytotherapy. 2020 Mar;22(3):166-171 [PMID: 32063474]
  23. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1507-17 [PMID: 25317870]
  24. Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):517-528 [PMID: 25319501]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):573-83 [PMID: 23295790]
  26. Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 28;9:2235 [PMID: 30323814]
  27. Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):E352-E355 [PMID: 30058145]
  28. BioDrugs. 2013 Aug;27(4):293-304 [PMID: 23696252]
  29. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):540-9 [PMID: 25154820]
  30. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Feb 20;133(4):474-482 [PMID: 31977556]
  31. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):6995-7003 [PMID: 31444250]
  32. Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):e138-e146 [PMID: 31585984]
  33. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 10;38(17):1938-1950 [PMID: 32286905]
  34. Oncogene. 2007 May 28;26(25):3704-13 [PMID: 17530024]
  35. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Apr 3;13(1):30 [PMID: 32245502]
  36. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Feb;23(2):235-246 [PMID: 27638367]
  37. Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7750):112-116 [PMID: 30918399]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0celltherapyTR/RpatientsDLBCLB-ALLanti-CD19-CARanti-CD22CAR-Ttwoanti-CD22-CARsalvagediseaseCRobtainedkindsCRSobservechimericantigenreceptordiffuselargeB-celllymphomaBacuteleukemiareachprogressedSDthreesixCrionemonthsachievedCAR=0timepeakdayssyndromegradeddifferencegradestherapiesCellBACKGROUND:efficacymodifiedrelapsed/refractorylymphoidwhoseMETHODS:studysevenreachedstableprogressionPDcompleteresponse/CRincompletecountrecoveryrelapsedfollowingthirteenreceivedagainRESULTS:FourPRpatientoverallsurvivalOS6142±3395August312020differentmedianexpansionpeakscells920proportionlaterpostinfusion022cytokinerelease2-4notable1-2immuneeffectassociatedneurotoxicICANShematologicaltoxicityCONCLUSION:highlyeffectivefailedneedexpandnumbercontinueTRIALREGISTRATION:ChiCTR-ONN-16009862ChiCTR1800019298Anti-CD22TherapySalvageTreatmentMalignanciesRefractoryRelapsedAnti-CD19lymphoblasticanti-CD19

Similar Articles

Cited By