Assessment of environmental sustainability in renal healthcare.

Kei Nagai, Hiroaki Suzuki, Atsushi Ueda, John W M Agar, Norihiro Itsubo
Author Information
  1. Kei Nagai: Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
  2. Hiroaki Suzuki: Faculty of Environmental and Information Studies, Tokyo City University, Japan.
  3. Atsushi Ueda: Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
  4. John W M Agar: Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospital Geelong, Australia.
  5. Norihiro Itsubo: Faculty of Environmental and Information Studies, Tokyo City University, Japan.

Abstract

The health effects of climate change are becoming increasingly important; there are direct effects from heatwaves and floods, and indirect effects from the altered distribution of infectious diseases and changes in crop yield. Ironically, the healthcare system itself carries an environmental burden, contributing to environmental health impacts. Life cycle assessment is a widely accepted and well-established method that quantitatively evaluates environmental impact. Given that monetary evaluations have the potential to motivate private companies and societies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions using market mechanisms, instead of assessing the carbon footprint alone, we previously developed a life cycle impact assessment method based on an endpoint that integrates comprehensive environmental burdens into a single index-the monetary cost. Previous investigations estimated that therapy for chronic kidney disease had a significant carbon footprint in the healthcare sector. We have been aiming to investigate on the environmental impact of chronic kidney disease based on field surveys from the renal department in a hospital and several health clinics in Japan. To live sustainably, it is necessary to establish cultures, practices, and research that aims to conserve resources to provide environmentally friendly healthcare in Japan.

Keywords

References

  1. Hemodial Int. 2011 Jan;15(1):39-51 [PMID: 21231998]
  2. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016 Apr 18;29(4):619-25 [PMID: 26958981]
  3. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2601 [PMID: 32388556]
  4. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Aug 15;43(16):6414-20 [PMID: 19746745]
  5. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1970-2 [PMID: 19903917]
  6. Lancet. 2018 May 12;391(10133):1908-1915 [PMID: 29502905]
  7. Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):369-74 [PMID: 23731962]
  8. Allergy. 2020 Sep;75(9):2158-2160 [PMID: 32738058]
  9. J Ren Care. 2010 Sep;36(3):153-60 [PMID: 20690969]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1335-43 [PMID: 23550671]
  11. BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 24;3(1): [PMID: 23355662]
  12. Int J Environ Health Res. 2020 Feb;30(1):63-74 [PMID: 30734575]
  13. Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jul;4(7):e271-e279 [PMID: 32681898]
  14. Int J Surg. 2011;9(1):72-4 [PMID: 20932944]
  15. Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Dec;1(9):e381-e388 [PMID: 29851650]
  16. Nature. 2008 Apr 3;452(7187):531-2 [PMID: 18385715]
  17. Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):310-7 [PMID: 16292302]
  18. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):217-23 [PMID: 8604175]
  19. QJM. 2010 Dec;103(12):965-75 [PMID: 20719900]
  20. Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1836-1878 [PMID: 31733928]
  21. PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 31;15(7):e1002623 [PMID: 30063712]
  22. Int J Med Robot. 2015 Dec;11(4):406-12 [PMID: 25708320]
  23. Lancet. 2018 Aug 4;392(10145):359 [PMID: 30102157]
  24. J Nephrol. 2020 Aug;33(4):681-698 [PMID: 32297293]
  25. Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1005 [PMID: 28901921]
  26. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 May;120(5):646-54 [PMID: 22266739]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141261 [PMID: 32745866]
  28. Environ Health. 2017 Dec 5;16(Suppl 1):117 [PMID: 29219100]
  29. Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):581-630 [PMID: 29096948]
  30. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e103-e104 [PMID: 29615220]
  31. Lancet. 2009 May 16;373(9676):1693-733 [PMID: 19447250]
  32. Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1185-9 [PMID: 24703554]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19703-8 [PMID: 18077404]
  34. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):369-381 [PMID: 30792131]
  35. Med J Aust. 2018 Apr 16;208(7):284-285 [PMID: 29642806]
  36. Kidney Int. 2017 Sep;92(3):526-530 [PMID: 28807256]
  37. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Oct;15(4):757-70 [PMID: 12364378]
  38. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e013302 [PMID: 27798031]
  39. Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Apr;1(1):e4-e5 [PMID: 29851591]
  40. Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Apr;1(1):e17-e25 [PMID: 29057392]
  41. Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Jan;24(1):88-93 [PMID: 29094785]
  42. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Dec;14(12):3270-7 [PMID: 14638926]
  43. Semin Dial. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):186-92 [PMID: 25440109]
  44. Glob Health Action. 2009 Mar 06;2: [PMID: 20027264]
  45. Eye (Lond). 2013 Apr;27(4):495-501 [PMID: 23429413]
  46. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jan;2(1):e27-e35 [PMID: 29615206]
  47. Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1861-914 [PMID: 26111439]
  48. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 May;16(5):257-268 [PMID: 32034297]
  49. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0157014 [PMID: 27280706]
  50. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Jun;30(6):1018-27 [PMID: 25808949]
  51. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):1472-83 [PMID: 27151892]
  52. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Dec;20(4):304-312 [PMID: 30482138]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0environmentalhealthcarecycleassessmentimpacthealtheffectscarbonfootprintlifechronicmethodmonetarybasedkidneydiseaserenalJapanclimatechangebecomingincreasinglyimportantdirectheatwavesfloodsindirectaltereddistributioninfectiousdiseaseschangescropyieldIronicallysystemcarriesburdencontributingimpactsLifewidelyacceptedwell-establishedquantitativelyevaluatesGivenevaluationspotentialmotivateprivatecompaniessocietiesreducegreenhousegasemissionsusingmarketmechanismsinsteadassessingalonepreviouslydevelopedendpointintegratescomprehensiveburdenssingleindex-thecostPreviousinvestigationsestimatedtherapysignificantsectoraiminginvestigatefieldsurveysdepartmenthospitalseveralclinicslivesustainablynecessaryestablishculturespracticesresearchaimsconserveresourcesprovideenvironmentallyfriendlyAssessmentsustainabilitydialysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)