The song, not the singer: Infants prefer to listen to familiar songs, regardless of singer identity.

Haley E Kragness, Elizabeth K Johnson, Laura K Cirelli
Author Information
  1. Haley E Kragness: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  2. Elizabeth K Johnson: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Laura K Cirelli: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

Parent's infant-directed vocalizations are highly dynamic and emotive compared to their adult-directed counterparts, and correspondingly, more effectively capture infants' attention. Infant-directed singing is a specific type of vocalization that is common throughout the world. Parents tend to sing a small handful of songs in a stereotyped way, and a number of recent studies have highlighted the significance of familiar songs in young children's social behaviors and evaluations. To date, no studies have examined whether infants' responses to familiar versus unfamiliar songs are modulated by singer identity (i.e., whether the singer is their own parent). In the present study, we investigated 9- to 12-month-old infants' (N = 29) behavioral and electrodermal responses to relatively familiar and unfamiliar songs sung by either their own mother or another infant's mother. Familiar songs recruited more attention and rhythmic movement, and lower electrodermal levels relative to unfamiliar songs. Moreover, these responses were robust regardless of whether the singer was their mother or a stranger, even when the stranger's rendition differed greatly from their mothers' in mean fundamental frequency and tempo. Results indicate that infants' interest in familiar songs is not limited to idiosyncratic characteristics of their parents' song renditions, and points to the potential for song as an effective early signifier of group membership.

Keywords

References

  1. Bainbridge, C. M., Bertolo, M., Youngers, J., Atwood, S., Yurdum, L., Simson, J., Lopez, K., Xing, F., Martin, A., & Mehr, S. A. (2021). Infants relax in response to unfamiliar foreign lullabies. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00963-z
  2. Barker, B., & Newman, R. (2004). Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition, 94(2), B45-B53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.001
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  4. Bartholomeus, B. (1974). Dichotic singer and speaker recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4(4), 407-408. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336735
  5. Baruch, C., & Drake, C. (1997). Tempo discrimination in infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 20(4), 573-577.
  6. Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028
  7. Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2018). Young infants’ word comprehension given an unfamiliar talker or altered pronunciations. Child Development, 89(5), 1567-1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12888
  8. Bergeson, T. R., & Trehub, S. E. (2002). Absolute pitch and tempo in mothers’ songs to infants. Psychological Science, 13(1), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00413
  9. Bergeson, T. R., & Trehub, S. E. (2007). Signature tunes in mothers’ speech to infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(4), 648-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.03.003
  10. Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378-400. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2017/RJ-2017-066/index.html
  11. Cirelli, L. K., Jurewicz, Z. B., & Trehub, S. E. (2020). Effects of maternal singing style on mother-infant arousal and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(7), 1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01402
  12. Cirelli, L. K., & Trehub, S. E. (2018). Infants help singers of familiar songs. Music & Science, 1, 205920431876162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318761622
  13. Cirelli, L. K., & Trehub, S. E. (2020). Familiar songs reduce infant distress. Developmental Psychology, 56(5), 861-868. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000917
  14. Cooper, A., Fecher, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2018). Toddlers’ comprehension of adult and child talkers: Adult targets versus vocal tract similarity. Cognition, 173, 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.013
  15. Critchley, H. D. (2002). Review: electrodermal responses: What happens in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840200800209
  16. Custodero, L., & Johnson-Green, E. (2003). Passing the cultural torch: Musical experience and musical parenting of infants. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345844
  17. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2016). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 217-243). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415782.010
  18. DeCasper, A., & Fifer, W. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers voices. Science, 208(4448), 1174-1176. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375928
  19. Egermann, H., Fernando, N., Chuen, L., & McAdams, S. (2015). Music induces universal emotion-related psychophysiological responses: Comparing Canadian listeners to Congolese Pygmies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01341
  20. ELAN (Version 6.0) [Computer software]. (2020). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Retrieved from https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan"
  21. Fecher, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2018). The native-language benefit for talker identification is robust in 7.5-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(12), 1911-1920. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000555
  22. Fecher, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2019). By 4.5 months, linguistic experience already affects infants’ talker processing abilities. Child Development, 90(5), 1535-1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13280
  23. Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development, 60(6), 1497. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130938
  24. Fifer, W. P., & Moon, C. M. (1995). The effects of fetal experience with sound. In J.-P. Lecanuet, W. P. Fifer, N. A. Krasnegor, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 351-366). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  25. Ham, J., & Tronick, E. (2006). Infant resilience to the stress of the still-face: Infant and maternal psychophysiology are related. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.038
  26. Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 69-95). Ablex Publishing.
  27. Ilari, B. (2005). On musical parenting of young children: Musical beliefs and behaviors of mothers and infants. Early Child Development and Care, 175(7-8), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000302573
  28. Kisilevsky, Barbara S., Hains, S. M. J., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Ye, H. H., Zhang, K., & Wang, Z. (2003). Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science, 14(3), 220-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02435
  29. Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M. J., Brown, C. A., Lee, C. T., Cowperthwaite, B., Stutzman, S. S., Swansburg, M. L., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Ye, H.-H., Zhang, K., & Wang, Z. (2009). Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.002
  30. Kragness, H. E., & Cirelli, L. K. (2021). A syncing feeling: Reductions in physiological arousal in response to observed social synchrony. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa116
  31. Lartillot, O., & Toiviainen, P. (2007). A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In S. Marchand (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 237-244). France: Bordeaux. Retrieved from http://cms2.unige.ch/fapse/neuroemo/pdf/ArticleLartillot2007Bordeaux.pdf
  32. McAdams, S., Douglas, C., & Vempala, N. N. (2017). Perception and modeling of affective qualities of musical instrument sounds across pitch registers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00153
  33. Mehr, S. A., Song, L. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2016). For 5-month-old infants, melodies are social. Psychological Science, 27(4), 486-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615626691
  34. Mehr, Samuel A., Singh, M., York, H., Glowacki, L., & Krasnow, M. M. (2018). Form and function in human song. Current Biology, 28(3), 356-368.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.042
  35. Mehr, Samuel A., & Spelke, E. S. (2018). Shared musical knowledge in 11-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12542. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12542
  36. Mendoza, J. K., & Fausey, C. M. (2021). Everyday music in infancy. Developmental Science, e13122. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13122.
  37. Nakata, T., & Trehub, S. E. (2011). Expressive timing and dynamics in infant-directed and non-infant-directed singing. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain, 21(1-2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094003
  38. Peynircioğlu, Z. F. (2016). Matching speaking to singing voices and the influence of Ccontent. Journal of Voice, 5.
  39. Plantinga, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2009). Melody recognition by two-month-old infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), EL58-EL62. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3049583
  40. Politimou, N., Stewart, L., Müllensiefen, D., & Franco, F. (2018). Music@Home: A novel instrument to assess the home musical environment in the early years. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0193819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193819
  41. Robert, J. (2011). Pydub [Github repository]. Retrieved from https://github.com/jiaaro/pydub
  42. Soley, G. (2019). What do group members share? The privileged status of cultural knowledge for children. Cognitive Science, 43(10), e12786. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12786
  43. Soley, G., & Spelke, E. S. (2016). Shared cultural knowledge: Effects of music on young children's social preferences. Cognition, 148, 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.017
  44. Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category - ELAN and ISO DCR. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
  45. The ManyBabies Consortium, Frank, M. C., Alcock, K. J., Arias-Trejo, N., Aschersleben, G., Baldwin, D., Barbu, S., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Black, A. K., Blything, R., Böhland, M. P., Bolitho, P., Borovsky, A., Brady, S. M., Braun, B., Brown, A., Byers-Heinlein, K., Campbell, L. E., … Soderstrom, M. (2020). Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 24-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919900809
  46. Trainor, L. J., & Trehub, S. E. (1992). A comparison of infants' and adults' sensitivity to Western musical structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.394
  47. Trehub, S. E., & Gudmundsdottir, H. R. (2019). Mothers as singing mentors for infants. In G. F. Welch, D. M. Howard, & J. Nix (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Singing (pp. 454-470). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199660773.013.25
  48. Trehub, S. E., Plantinga, J., & Russo, F. A. (2016). Maternal vocal interactions with infants: Reciprocal visual influences. Social Development, 25(3), 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12164
  49. Trehub, S. E., & Thorpe, L. A. (1989). Infants’ perception of rhythm: Categorization of auditory sequences by temporal structure. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084223
  50. Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M., & Henderson, J. L. (1994). Children's songs to infant siblings: Parallels with speech. Journal of Child Language, 21(3), 735-744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009533
  51. van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2012). Infants exposed to fluent natural speech succeed at cross-gender word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 554-560. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0347
  52. Van Lancker, D. R., & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32(2), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(87)90128-3
  53. Vouloumanos, A., Hauser, M. D., Werker, J. F., & Martin, A. (2010). The tuning of human neonates’ preference for speech. Child Development, 81(2), 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01412.x
  54. Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science, 10(2), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00549.x
  55. Ward, C. D., & Cooper, R. P. (1999). A lack of evidence in 4-month-old human infants for paternal voice preference. Developmental Psychobiology, 35(1), 49-59.

MeSH Term

Adult
Auditory Perception
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Infant
Parents
Singing
Social Behavior