General Surgery Resident Autonomy: Truth and Myth.

Jason W Kempenich, Daniel L Dent
Author Information
  1. Jason W Kempenich: UT Health San Antonio, Department of Surgery, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. Electronic address: kempenich@uthscsa.edu.
  2. Daniel L Dent: UT Health San Antonio, Department of Surgery, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.

Abstract

Within general surgery education circles, the state of autonomy for residents in surgery training programs has been of growing concern. Although there is no direct evidence showing less autonomy in modern surgical training, multiple surrogates have been cited as reasons for concern. Many reasons have been given for lost autonomy including the 80-hour work week, financial constraints, concerns over quality of patient care, patient expectations, new and innovative technologies, legal limitations, and public opinion. This article discusses the current state of general surgery resident autonomy, why autonomy is important, barriers to autonomy, and ways to support autonomy.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Clinical Competence
General Surgery
Humans
Internship and Residency
Patient Safety
Professional Autonomy
Self Concept
Social Responsibility
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0autonomysurgerygeneralstatetrainingconcernreasonspatientGeneralResidentWithineducationcirclesresidentsprogramsgrowingAlthoughdirectevidenceshowinglessmodernsurgicalmultiplesurrogatescitedManygivenlostincluding80-hourworkweekfinancialconstraintsconcernsqualitycareexpectationsnewinnovativetechnologieslegallimitationspublicopinionarticlediscussescurrentresidentimportantbarrierswayssupportSurgeryAutonomy:TruthMythConfidencePatientownership

Similar Articles

Cited By