Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study.

Krishma Labib, Rea Roje, Lex Bouter, Guy Widdershoven, Natalie Evans, Ana Marušić, Lidwine Mokkink, Joeri Tijdink
Author Information
  1. Krishma Labib: Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.labib@amsterdamumc.nl. ORCID
  2. Rea Roje: School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska ul. 2, 21000, Split, Croatia.
  3. Lex Bouter: Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Guy Widdershoven: Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  5. Natalie Evans: Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  6. Ana Marušić: School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska ul. 2, 21000, Split, Croatia.
  7. Lidwine Mokkink: Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  8. Joeri Tijdink: Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers' behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study to explore which RI topics to address in institutional RI policies by seeking consensus from research policy experts and institutional leaders. A total of 68 RPO and 52 RFO experts, representing different disciplines, countries and genders, completed one, two or all rounds of the study. There was consensus among the experts on the importance of 12 RI topics for RPOs and 11 for RFOs. The topics that ranked highest for RPOs concerned education and training, supervision and mentoring, dealing with RI breaches, and supporting a responsible research process (e.g. through quality assurance). The highest ranked RFO topics concerned dealing with breaches of RI, conflicts of interest, and setting expectations on RPOs (e.g. about educating researchers about RI). Together with the research policy experts and institutional leaders, we developed a comprehensive overview of topics important for inclusion in the RI policies of RPOs and RFOs. The topics reflect preference for a preventative approach to RI, coupled with procedures for dealing with RI breaches. RPOs and RFOs should address each of these topics in order to support researchers in conducting responsible research.

Keywords

References

  1. Account Res. 2014;21(1):68-83 [PMID: 24073608]
  2. Acad Med. 2010 Aug;85(8):1296-302 [PMID: 20671455]
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:143-146 [PMID: 29275217]
  4. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019 Jun 10;15(1):5 [PMID: 31179512]
  5. Nature. 2010 Jul 22;466(7305):436-7 [PMID: 20651673]
  6. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [PMID: 29937585]
  7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):293 [PMID: 33267819]
  8. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(4):376-82 [PMID: 12581103]
  9. Ochsner J. 2013 Fall;13(3):400-6 [PMID: 24052772]
  10. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):195-200 [PMID: 11223060]
  11. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):241-6 [PMID: 21365474]
  12. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1531-1547 [PMID: 31981051]
  13. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 16;20(1):72 [PMID: 31619226]
  14. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74 [PMID: 16501647]
  15. Med Teach. 2005 Nov;27(7):639-43 [PMID: 16332558]
  16. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):177-80 [PMID: 25574274]
  17. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):5 [PMID: 31160744]
  18. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476 [PMID: 21694759]
  19. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12 [PMID: 16422719]
  20. F1000Res. 2015 Mar 13;4:66 [PMID: 25866623]
  21. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2363-2369 [PMID: 31965429]
  22. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1097-8 [PMID: 23540852]
  23. Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(2):230-235 [PMID: 30559173]
  24. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;104(2):317-325 [PMID: 29205299]
  25. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Nov 21;1:17 [PMID: 29451551]
  26. Account Res. 2010 Mar;17(2):51-66 [PMID: 20306348]
  27. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(2):159-64 [PMID: 12078541]
  28. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9 [PMID: 24581294]
  29. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):358-360 [PMID: 33041342]
  30. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1023-1034 [PMID: 29855866]
  31. Qual Health Res. 2006 Jul;16(6):821-35 [PMID: 16760538]
  32. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170 [PMID: 29550964]
  33. F1000Res. 2014 May 28;3:119 [PMID: 25324963]
  34. Account Res. 2012;19(4):243-6 [PMID: 22861180]

MeSH Term

Consensus
Delphi Technique
Female
Humans
Male
Organizations
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RItopicsresearchResearchRPOspoliciesaddressinstitutionalRFOsexpertsintegrityorganizationsconsensuspolicydealingbreachesfosterperformingfundingcomprehensiveimportantDelphistudyleadersRFOrankedhighestconcernedresponsibleegresearchersnecessarysystem-of-sciencefactorsinfluenceresearchers'behaviorConsequentlydevelopoutliningconcretestepswilltakefarThereforeconductedthreeroundsurveyexploreseekingtotal68RPO52representingdifferentdisciplinescountriesgenderscompletedonetworoundsamongimportance1211educationtrainingsupervisionmentoringsupportingprocessqualityassuranceconflictsinterestsettingexpectationseducatingTogetherdevelopedoverviewinclusionthe RIreflectpreferencepreventativeapproachcoupledproceduresordersupportconductingImportantTopicsFosteringIntegrityPerformingFundingOrganizations:ConsensusStudyInstitutional

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)