Comparison of the effect of training academic honesty using two workshop and virtual training methods on the knowledge and attitude of M. S. students.

Pyam Nikjo, Fatemeh Vizeshfar, Nahid Zarifsanayee
Author Information
  1. Pyam Nikjo: Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Fatemeh Vizeshfar: Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  3. Nahid Zarifsanayee: Department of E-learning, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, one of the most important challenges of the universities and higher education centers is academic dishonesty among students. Academic dishonesty is done through cheating, deception, and plagiarism, which creates serious educational, studious, and social problems for the students and society. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of virtual and workshop training on the knowledge and attitude of M. S. students in terms of plagiarism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was an applied interventional study of quasi-experimental type having pretest and posttest and the participants of this study included 90 M. S. nursing students of Medical Science University of Shiraz in the southwestern part of Iran.
RESULTS: The comparison of the three groups indicated that virtual and workshop training, both, developed the knowledge and attitude of students regarding plagiarism; however, the comparison between two methods did not indicate a statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSION: Both virtual and workshop training methods had an effect on increasing students' knowledge and attitude. Regarding the positive effect of training academic dishonesty using two workshop and virtual training methods, both can be used as efficient and effective methods in training dimensions depending on the condition and facilities to prevent and reduce plagiarism in students.

Keywords

References

  1. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 May;40(5):588-594 [PMID: 29054507]
  2. Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):532-536 [PMID: 31086546]
  3. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Feb;20(1):e77-e82 [PMID: 32190373]
  4. Glob Health Action. 2015 May 11;8:26341 [PMID: 25971398]
  5. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Jan;204(1):61-3 [PMID: 26704465]
  6. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186054 [PMID: 29073226]
  7. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):118-123 [PMID: 30820223]
  8. J Dent Educ. 2006 Dec;70(12):1366-9 [PMID: 17170329]
  9. Eye Sci. 2015 Jun;30(2):67-9 [PMID: 26902064]
  10. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 05;14:45 [PMID: 24597923]
  11. Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:104-17 [PMID: 26188441]
  12. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):767-772 [PMID: 28507368]
  13. J Dent Educ. 2008 Sep;72(9):1048-57 [PMID: 18768447]
  14. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0202252 [PMID: 30096189]
  15. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):233 [PMID: 31238927]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529 [PMID: 30882355]
  17. Nurs Ethics. 2016 Dec;23(8):919-931 [PMID: 26002938]
  18. Nurs Ethics. 2011 Sep;18(5):725-33 [PMID: 21646326]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingstudentsvirtualworkshopknowledgeattitudemethodsplagiarismeffectacademicdishonestystudyMStwoAcademiccomparisonusinghonestyBACKGROUND:NowadaysoneimportantchallengesuniversitieshighereducationcentersamongdonecheatingdeceptioncreatesseriouseducationalstudioussocialproblemssocietypurposecomparetermsMATERIALSANDMETHODS:researchappliedinterventionalquasi-experimentaltypepretestposttestparticipantsincluded90nursingMedicalScienceUniversityShirazsouthwesternpartIranRESULTS:threegroupsindicateddevelopedregardinghoweverindicatestatisticallysignificantdifferenceCONCLUSION:increasingstudents'RegardingpositivecanusedefficienteffectivedimensionsdependingconditionfacilitiespreventreduceComparisonlearning

Similar Articles

Cited By