In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.

Padikkamannil Abishad, Pollumahanti Niveditha, Varsha Unni, Jess Vergis, Nitin Vasantrao Kurkure, Sandeep Chaudhari, Deepak Bhiwa Rawool, Sukhadeo Baliram Barbuddhe
Author Information
  1. Padikkamannil Abishad: Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, KVASU, 673 576, Pookode, Wayanad, India.
  2. Pollumahanti Niveditha: ICAR-National Research Centre on Meat, Chengicherla, Boduppal Post, 500 092, Hyderabad, India.
  3. Varsha Unni: Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, KVASU, 673 576, Pookode, Wayanad, India.
  4. Jess Vergis: Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, KVASU, 673 576, Pookode, Wayanad, India.
  5. Nitin Vasantrao Kurkure: Nagpur Veterinary College, MAFSU, Seminary Hills, 440 006, Nagpur, India.
  6. Sandeep Chaudhari: Nagpur Veterinary College, MAFSU, Seminary Hills, 440 006, Nagpur, India.
  7. Deepak Bhiwa Rawool: ICAR-National Research Centre on Meat, Chengicherla, Boduppal Post, 500 092, Hyderabad, India.
  8. Sukhadeo Baliram Barbuddhe: ICAR-National Research Centre on Meat, Chengicherla, Boduppal Post, 500 092, Hyderabad, India. barbuddhesb@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the wake of emergence of antimicrobial resistance, bioactive phytochemical compounds are proving to be important therapeutic agents. The present study envisaged in silico molecular docking as well as in vitro antimicrobial efficacy screening of identified phytochemical ligands to the dispersin (aap) and outer membrane osmoporin (OmpC) domains of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. (NTS), respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluation of drug-likeness, molecular properties, and bioactivity of the identified phytocompounds (thymol, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde) was carried out using Swiss ADME, while Protox-II and StopTox servers were used to identify its toxicity. The in silico molecular docking of the phytochemical ligands with the protein motifs of dispersin (PDB ID: 2jvu) and outer membrane osmoporin (PDB ID: 3uu2) were carried out using AutoDock v.4.20. Further, the antimicrobial efficacy of these compounds against multi-drug resistant EAEC and NTS strains was determined by estimating the minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations. Subsequently, these phytochemicals were subjected to their safety (sheep and human erythrocytic haemolysis) as well as stability (cationic salts, and pH) assays.
RESULTS: All the three identified phytochemicals ligands were found to be zero violators of Lipinski's rule of five and exhibited drug-likeness. The compounds tested were categorized as toxicity class-4 by Protox-II and were found to be non- cardiotoxic by StopTox. The docking studies employing 3D model of dispersin and ompC motifs with the identified phytochemical ligands exhibited good binding affinity. The identified phytochemical compounds were observed to be comparatively stable at different conditions (cationic salts, and pH); however, a concentration-dependent increase in the haemolytic assay was observed against sheep as well as human erythrocytes.
CONCLUSIONS: In silico molecular docking studies provided useful insights to understand the interaction of phytochemical ligands with protein motifs of pathogen and should be used routinely before the wet screening of any phytochemicals for their antibacterial, stability, and safety aspects.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Jan 16;337:108947 [PMID: 33181419]
  2. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 31;4(4):e001710 [PMID: 31543995]
  3. Pathogens. 2020 Jan 13;9(1): [PMID: 31941158]
  4. J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec;30(16):2785-91 [PMID: 19399780]
  5. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 04;20(18): [PMID: 31487867]
  6. Front Microbiol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2173 [PMID: 31608028]
  7. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 13;8:137 [PMID: 31417673]
  8. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 03;7:42717 [PMID: 28256516]
  9. Molecules. 2019 Nov 30;24(23): [PMID: 31801244]
  10. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;38:21-31 [PMID: 25529123]
  11. Zoonoses Public Health. 2019 Nov;66(7):701-728 [PMID: 31313525]
  12. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019 Feb;16(2):130-136 [PMID: 30707626]
  13. Future Sci OA. 2019 Jul 25;5(7):FSO407 [PMID: 31428453]
  14. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(2):133-49 [PMID: 18686775]
  15. Biotechnol Adv. 2020 Jan - Feb;38:107287 [PMID: 30086329]
  16. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(18):3042-3053 [PMID: 31617738]
  17. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2017 Oct - Dec;8(4):266-275 [PMID: 28869082]
  18. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Mar;24:285-295 [PMID: 33484895]
  19. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Aug 2;278:44-51 [PMID: 29702315]
  20. Food Chem. 2016 Nov 1;210:402-14 [PMID: 27211664]
  21. Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):693-710 [PMID: 24309541]
  22. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Aug 04;9(8): [PMID: 32759771]
  23. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2021 Jan;41(1):1-7 [PMID: 33506212]
  24. Pathog Dis. 2020 Jun 1;78(4): [PMID: 32667665]
  25. Pharmacol Rev. 2011 Jun;63(2):390-410 [PMID: 21490128]
  26. Plants (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;9(11): [PMID: 33182768]
  27. J Chem Inf Model. 2017 May 22;57(5):1013-1017 [PMID: 28459556]
  28. Indian J Med Res. 2019 Feb;149(2):119-128 [PMID: 31219076]
  29. Vet World. 2015 May;8(5):669-73 [PMID: 27047154]
  30. J Clin Invest. 2002 Nov;110(9):1329-37 [PMID: 12417572]
  31. Front Immunol. 2020 Jan 09;10:2966 [PMID: 31998292]
  32. Microb Pathog. 2020 Oct;147:104405 [PMID: 32707313]
  33. Medicines (Basel). 2017 Aug 08;4(3): [PMID: 28930272]
  34. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W257-W263 [PMID: 29718510]
  35. Biomolecules. 2021 Feb 18;11(2): [PMID: 33670478]

Grants

  1. NASF/ABA-8007/Indian Council of Agricultural Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0phytochemicalmoleculardockingidentifiedligandsantimicrobialcompoundssilicophytochemicalswellefficacydispersincoliSalmonellamotifsvitroscreeningoutermembraneosmoporinenteroaggregativeEscherichiaEAECnon-typhoidalsppNTSdrug-likenesscarriedusingProtox-IIStopToxusedtoxicityproteinPDBID:minimumconcentrationssafetysheephumanstabilitycationicsaltspHfoundexhibitedstudiesobservedBACKGROUND:wakeemergenceresistancebioactiveprovingimportanttherapeuticagentspresentstudyenvisagedaapOmpCdomainsrespectivelyMATERIALSANDMETHODS:evaluationpropertiesbioactivityphytocompoundsthymolcarvacrolcinnamaldehydeSwissADMEserversidentify2jvu3uu2AutoDockv420multi-drugresistantstrainsdeterminedestimatinginhibitorybactericidalSubsequentlysubjectederythrocytichaemolysisassaysRESULTS:threezeroviolatorsLipinski'srulefivetestedcategorizedclass-4non-cardiotoxicemploying3DmodelompCgoodbindingaffinitycomparativelystabledifferentconditionshoweverconcentration-dependentincreasehaemolyticassayerythrocytesCONCLUSIONS:providedusefulinsightsunderstandinteractionpathogenroutinelywetantibacterialaspectsmulti-drug-resistantDockingEnteroaggregativeENon-typhoidalPhytochemical

Similar Articles

Cited By