Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A PRISMA-Compliant Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

Liwei Lv, Xuefei Sun, Yuchen Wu, Qu Cui, Yuedan Chen, Yuanbo Liu
Author Information
  1. Liwei Lv: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  2. Xuefei Sun: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  3. Yuchen Wu: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  4. Qu Cui: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  5. Yuedan Chen: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  6. Yuanbo Liu: Department of Hematology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is an aggressive lymphoma. Studies investigating primary CNSL determined that the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) played an important role in pathogenesis. ibrutinib, an oral BTK inhibitor, is a new treatment strategy for CNSL. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in the treatment of CNSL.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted through to 31 October 2019. Studies involving patients with CNSL who received ibrutinib that reported the overall response (OR), complete remission (CR), and partial response (PR) were included. The random-effects or fixed-effects model with double arcsine transformation was used for the pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for all outcomes.
RESULTS: Eight studies including 162 patients were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR rate after treatment with ibrutinib was 69% (95% CI, 61-79%, = 47.57%, = 0.06), while the pooled CR and PR was 52% (95% CI, 35-68%, = 74.95%, = 0.00) and 17% (95% CI, 7-30%, = 67.85%, = 0.00), respectively. Among PCNSL patients, including new diagnoses PCNSL and R/R PCNSL, the pooled OR rate was 72% (95% CI, 63-80%, = 49.20%, = 0.06) while the pooled CR and PR rates were 53% (95% CI, 33-73%, = 75.04%, = 0.00) and 22% (95% CI, 14-30%, = 46.30%, = 0.07), respectively. Common adverse events above grade 3 included cytopenia and infections.
CONCLUSIONS: The ibrutinib-containing therapy was well tolerated and offered incremental benefit to patients with CNSL. However, randomized-controlled studies that directly compare efficacy and adverse events of ibrutinib are still needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020218974.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1512-20 [PMID: 19767089]
  2. Cancer Discov. 2017 Sep;7(9):1018-1029 [PMID: 28619981]
  3. Cancer Discov. 2017 Sep;7(9):940-942 [PMID: 28864640]
  4. Br J Haematol. 2020 Jul;190(2):e110-e114 [PMID: 32452526]
  5. Neuro Oncol. 2019 Feb 19;21(3):306-313 [PMID: 30423172]
  6. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;22(7):1572-82 [PMID: 26660519]
  7. Blood. 2019 Jan 31;133(5):436-445 [PMID: 30567753]
  8. Br J Haematol. 2021 Mar;192(6):1049-1053 [PMID: 32677095]
  9. Ann Oncol. 2011 Apr;22(4):979-984 [PMID: 20935059]
  10. Immunol Res. 2001;23(2-3):147-56 [PMID: 11444380]
  11. Lancet Haematol. 2016 May;3(5):e217-27 [PMID: 27132696]
  12. Circulation. 2020 Dec 22;142(25):2456-2458 [PMID: 33347329]
  13. Nature. 2000 Feb 3;403(6769):503-11 [PMID: 10676951]
  14. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;81(4):783-789 [PMID: 29476222]
  15. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019 Sep;12(9):787-796 [PMID: 31305170]
  16. Br J Haematol. 2020 Aug;190(3):394-404 [PMID: 32232989]
  17. Cancer Cell. 2017 Jun 12;31(6):833-843.e5 [PMID: 28552327]
  18. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 [PMID: 12956787]
  19. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):13075-80 [PMID: 20615965]
  21. Immunol Rev. 2000 Jun;175:120-7 [PMID: 10933597]
  22. Neurology. 2017 Jan 3;88(1):101-102 [PMID: 27864520]
  23. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5034-43 [PMID: 15955902]
  24. Blood. 2014 May 22;123(21):3286-95 [PMID: 24659631]
  25. Blood Rev. 2020 Mar;40:100635 [PMID: 31699465]
  26. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Jun 20;133(12):1462-1469 [PMID: 32452898]
  27. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Aug;117:121-130 [PMID: 31279304]
  28. Pharm Stat. 2015 Jan-Feb;14(1):26-33 [PMID: 25339496]
  29. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Aug;152:103010 [PMID: 32540781]
  30. Chin Neurosurg J. 2021 Apr 2;7(1):20 [PMID: 33795020]
  31. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Sep;141:139-145 [PMID: 31295667]
  32. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160 [PMID: 33781993]
  33. Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(22):8676-8684 [PMID: 33068336]
  34. Neurology. 2020 Mar 10;94(10):e1027-e1039 [PMID: 31907289]
  35. Haematologica. 2013 Mar;98(3):364-70 [PMID: 23242601]
  36. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013 Mar;8(1):1-6 [PMID: 23296407]
  37. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20 [PMID: 27157931]
  38. Blood. 2013 Oct 10;122(15):2539-49 [PMID: 23886836]
  39. Stat Med. 2015 Mar 15;34(6):1031-40 [PMID: 25500942]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=95%CICNSL0ibrutinibpooledpatientslymphomatreatmentmeta-analysisORCRPRincluded00PCNSLCentralnervoussystemStudiesdeterminedBTKIbrutinibnewKnowledgeresponseratesstudiesincludingrate06respectivelyadverseeventsBACKGROUND:aggressiveinvestigatingprimaryBrutontyrosinekinaseplayedimportantrolepathogenesisoralinhibitorstrategypurposeclarifyeffectivenesssafetyMETHODS:systematicsearchPubMedEmbaseCochranelibraryWanfangDataServicePlatformChinaNationalInfrastructuredatabasesconducted31October2019involvingreceivedreportedoverallcompleteremissionpartialrandom-effectsfixed-effectsmodeldoublearcsinetransformationusedconfidenceintervalsoutcomesRESULTS:Eight162identified69%61-79%4757%52%35-68%7417%7-30%6785%AmongdiagnosesR/R72%63-80%4920%53%33-73%7504%22%14-30%4630%07Commongrade3cytopeniainfectionsCONCLUSIONS:ibrutinib-containingtherapywelltoleratedofferedincrementalbenefitHoweverrandomized-controlleddirectlycompareefficacystillneededSYSTEMATICREVIEWREGISTRATION:https://wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/identifierCRD42020218974EfficacySafetyNervousSystemLymphoma:PRISMA-CompliantSingle-ArmMeta-Analysiscentralrefractoryrelapsedsingle-arm

Similar Articles

Cited By