Automated Left Ventricle Ischemic Scar Detection in CT Using Deep Neural Networks.

Hugh O'Brien, John Whitaker, Baldeep Singh Sidhu, Justin Gould, Tanja Kurzendorfer, Mark D O'Neill, Ronak Rajani, Karine Grigoryan, Christopher Aldo Rinaldi, Jonathan Taylor, Kawal Rhode, Peter Mountney, Steven Niederer
Author Information
  1. Hugh O'Brien: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  2. John Whitaker: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Baldeep Singh Sidhu: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  4. Justin Gould: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  5. Tanja Kurzendorfer: Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
  6. Mark D O'Neill: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  7. Ronak Rajani: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  8. Karine Grigoryan: Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  9. Christopher Aldo Rinaldi: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  10. Jonathan Taylor: 3DLab, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  11. Kawal Rhode: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  12. Peter Mountney: Siemens Healthineers, Medical Imaging Technologies, Princeton, NJ, United States.
  13. Steven Niederer: School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a scar detection method for routine computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging using deep convolutional neural networks (CNN), which relies solely on anatomical information as input and is compatible with existing clinical workflows. Identifying cardiac patients with scar tissue is important for assisting diagnosis and guiding interventions. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for scar imaging; however, there are common instances where it is contraindicated. CTA is an alternative imaging modality that has fewer contraindications and is faster than Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging but is unable to reliably image scar. A dataset of LGE MRI (200 patients, 83 with scar) was used to train and validate a CNN to detect ischemic scar slices using segmentation masks as input to the network. MRIs were segmented to produce 3D left ventricle meshes, which were sampled at points along the short axis to extract anatomical masks, with scar labels from LGE as ground truth. The trained CNN was tested with an independent CTA dataset (25 patients, with ground truth established with paired LGE MRI). Automated segmentation was performed to provide the same input format of anatomical masks for the network. The CNN was compared against manual reading of the CTA dataset by 3 experts. Note that 84.7% cross-validated accuracy (AUC: 0.896) for detecting scar slices in the left ventricle on the MRI data was achieved. The trained network was tested against the CTA-derived data, with no further training, where it achieved an 88.3% accuracy (AUC: 0.901). The automated pipeline outperformed the manual reading by clinicians. Automatic ischemic scar detection can be performed from a routine cardiac CTA, without any scar-specific imaging or contrast agents. This requires only a single acquisition in the cardiac cycle. In a clinical setting, with near zero additional cost, scar presence could be detected to triage images, reduce reading times, and guide clinical decision-making.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation. 2006 Feb 14;113(6):823-33 [PMID: 16461822]
  2. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1239-1251 [PMID: 27236531]
  3. Europace. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):573-580 [PMID: 28431062]
  4. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975 [PMID: 27207191]
  5. Int J Cardiol. 1996 Jan;53(1):45-54 [PMID: 8776277]
  6. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 May - Jun;12(3):192-201 [PMID: 29754806]
  7. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar;42(2):135-42 [PMID: 25627144]
  8. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):822-832 [PMID: 26897692]
  9. JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1945-54 [PMID: 26547466]
  10. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):195-204 [PMID: 30288836]
  11. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb;4(2):150-6 [PMID: 21329899]
  12. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Sep;11(9):1573-83 [PMID: 27072840]
  13. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017;10(5):15 [PMID: 28446943]
  14. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Jul 09;11:22 [PMID: 19589148]
  15. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan 17;22(2):503-515 [PMID: 28103561]
  16. Europace. 2018 Nov 01;20(suppl_3):iii94-iii101 [PMID: 30476056]
  17. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):803-814 [PMID: 29759775]
  18. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):812-817 [PMID: 27256419]
  19. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(4):313-20 [PMID: 25977115]
  20. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5441 [PMID: 27777234]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0scarimagingCTACNNLGEMRInetworkanatomicalinputclinicalcardiacpatientsdatasetmasksleftventriclereadingdetectionroutinecomputedtomographyangiographyusingdeepconvolutionalneuralmagneticresonanceischemicslicessegmentationgroundtruthtrainedtestedAutomatedperformedmanualaccuracyAUC:0dataachievedautomatedaimstudydevelopmethodnetworksreliessolelyinformationcompatibleexistingworkflowsIdentifyingtissueimportantassistingdiagnosisguidinginterventionsLategadoliniumenhancementgoldstandardhowevercommoninstancescontraindicatedalternativemodalityfewercontraindicationsfasterCardiovascularunablereliablyimage20083usedtrainvalidatedetectMRIssegmentedproduce3Dmeshessampledpointsalongshortaxisextractlabelsindependent25establishedpairedprovideformatcompared3expertsNote847%cross-validated896detectingCTA-derivedtraining883%901pipelineoutperformedcliniciansAutomaticcanwithoutscar-specificcontrastagentsrequiressingleacquisitioncyclesettingnearzeroadditionalcostpresencedetectedtriageimagesreducetimesguidedecision-makingLeftVentricleIschemicScarDetectionCTUsingDeepNeuralNetworksclassificationlearningfibrosis

Similar Articles

Cited By