Source Apportionment of Environmental Combustion Sources using Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Machine Learning.

Jay W Rutherford, Timothy Larson, Timothy Gould, Edmund Seto, Igor V Novosselov, Jonathan D Posner
Author Information
  1. Jay W Rutherford: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.
  2. Timothy Larson: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.
  3. Timothy Gould: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.
  4. Edmund Seto: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.
  5. Igor V Novosselov: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.
  6. Jonathan D Posner: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States.

Abstract

The link between particulate matter (PM) air pollution and negative health effects is well-established. Air pollution was estimated to cause 4.9 million deaths in 2017 and PM was responsible for 94% of these deaths. In order to inform effective mitigation strategies in the future, further study of PM and its health effects is important. Here, we present a method for identifying sources of combustion generated PM using excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy and machine learning (ML) algorithms. PM samples were collected during a health effects exposure assessment panel study in Seattle. We use archived field samples from the exposure study and the associated positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment based on X-ray fluorescence and light absorbing carbon measurements to train convolutional neural network and principal component regression algorithms. We show EEM spectra from cyclohexane extracts of the archived filter samples can be used to accurately apportion mobile and vegetative burning sources but were unable to detect crustal dust, Cl-rich, secondary sulfate and fuel oil sources. The use of this EEM-ML approach may be used to conduct PM exposure studies that include source apportionment of combustion sources.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Feb;122(2):138-44 [PMID: 24213019]
  2. Lab Chip. 2016 Apr 21;16(8):1293-313 [PMID: 27043204]
  3. Compr Physiol. 2013 Oct;3(4):1437-71 [PMID: 24265235]
  4. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Mar;66(3):237-59 [PMID: 26756961]
  5. Environ Sci Technol. 2003 May 1;37(9):1873-81 [PMID: 12775060]
  6. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 4;50(19):10351-10360 [PMID: 27518497]
  7. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010 Jun;60(6):688-93 [PMID: 20564994]
  8. Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 7;54(13):8198-8209 [PMID: 32479734]
  9. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Dec;119(12):1691-9 [PMID: 21810552]
  10. Inhal Toxicol. 2008 Jan;20(1):49-52 [PMID: 18236222]
  11. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Jun;54(6):689-94 [PMID: 15242149]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 08;15(6): [PMID: 29890638]
  13. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Oct;111(13):1625-9 [PMID: 14527842]
  14. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 May;65(5):544-58 [PMID: 25947313]
  15. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):663-4 [PMID: 22946126]
  16. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Sep;54(9):1175-87 [PMID: 15468670]
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 17;50(10):4895-904 [PMID: 27010639]
  18. Atmos Environ (1994). 2020 Jan 1;220: [PMID: 32256182]
  19. J Big Data. 2021;8(1):101 [PMID: 34306963]
  20. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):909-18 [PMID: 12782491]
  21. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Dec 15;44(24):9405-12 [PMID: 21069954]

Grants

  1. P30 ES007033/NIEHS NIH HHS
  2. U01 EB021923/NIBIB NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PMsourceshealtheffectsstudysamplesexposurepollutiondeathscombustionusingmatrixEEMfluorescencealgorithmsusearchivedsourceapportionmentusedSourceApportionmentExcitationEmissionFluorescenceSpectroscopyMachineLearninglinkparticulatematterairnegativewell-establishedAirestimatedcause49million2017responsible94%orderinformeffectivemitigationstrategiesfutureimportantpresentmethodidentifyinggeneratedexcitation-emissionspectroscopymachinelearningMLcollectedassessmentpanelSeattlefieldassociatedpositivefactorizationPMFbasedX-raylightabsorbingcarbonmeasurementstrainconvolutionalneuralnetworkprincipalcomponentregressionshowspectracyclohexaneextractsfiltercanaccuratelyapportionmobilevegetativeburningunabledetectcrustaldustCl-richsecondarysulfatefueloilEEM-MLapproachmayconductstudiesincludeEnvironmentalCombustionSourcesMatrixParticulateMatter

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)