Caregivers' Technology Acceptance of an In-Home Care Management App: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Tzu-Ning Wen, Hao-Ming Li, Tzu-Chuan Hsu, Po-Lun Chang
Author Information
  1. Tzu-Ning Wen: Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (Dr Wcen); Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery TriService General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (Dr Li); Vice President for Nursing, Taiwan Adventist Hospital (Dr Hsu); and Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National YangMing Chiao Tung University (Dr Chang), Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

Taiwan faces challenges in providing long-term family care as its population rapidly ages. This study aimed to construct a health application that could effectively meet family caregivers' needs in providing home care. Mixed methods were adopted to explore their acceptance of the application, as well as to gather their suggestions for improving the application. A nonrandomized controlled group pretest-posttest design was utilized. The participants were family caregivers who were recruited via purposive sampling at a regional hospital in Taipei, Taiwan. The caregivers used the application to monitor and manage the health of those they were caring for. Elderly family caregivers scored 1.57 and 1.16 points higher than their middle-aged counterparts in terms of performance expectancy (0.61-2.53, P = .01) and effort expectancy (0.25-2.06, P = .01), respectively. The caregivers opined that it was convenient to use the application for managing the health data of their patients, and resources and solutions for overcoming problems when using the application were easily within their reach. They also suggested that relevant information for promoting patient mental health could also be included in the application. Thus, the software is acceptable to all the family caregivers regardless of age, indicating that it can assist family caregivers in the future in performing home care management.

References

  1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2017_world_population_prospects-2017_revision_databooklet.pdf
  2. Thane P. Old Age in English History: Past Experiences, Present Issues . Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  3. Thome B, Dykes AK, Hallberg IR. Home care with regard to definition, care recipients, content and outcome: systematic literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing . 2003;12(6): 860–872.
  4. The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (2010). Basic Statistics About Home Care. http://www.nahc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/10hc_stats.pdf
  5. Rose JH, Bowman KF, O'Toole EE, et al. Caregiver objective burden and assessments of patient-centered, family-focused care for frail elderly veterans. Gerontologist . 2007;47(1): 21–33.
  6. Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior (2018). Household registration statistics data analysis in October 2018. https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/en/2120
  7. Sakanashi S, Fujita K. Empowerment of family caregivers of adults and elderly persons: a concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice . 2017;23(5).
  8. Cready CM, Yeatts DE, Gosdin MM, Potts HF. CNA empowerment: effects on job performance and work attitudes. Journal of Gerontological Nursing . 2008;34(3): 26–35.
  9. Wildevuur SE, Simonse LW. Information and communication technology–enabled person-centered care for the “big five” chronic conditions: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research . 2015;17(3): e77.
  10. National Alliance for Caregiving (2011). e-Connected family caregiver: bringing caregiving into the 21st Century. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FINAL_eConnected_Family_Caregiver_Study_Jan-2011.pdf
  11. LeRouge C, Van Slyke C, Seale D, Wright K. Baby boomers' adoption of consumer health technologies: survey on readiness and barriers. Journal of Medical Internet Research . 2014;16(9): e200.
  12. Huang F, Chang P, Hou IC, Tu MH, Lan CF. Use of a mobile device by nursing home residents for long-term care comprehensive geriatric self-assessment: a feasibility study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing . 2015;33(1): 28–36.
  13. Chang A. UTAUT and UTAUT 2: a review and agenda for future research. The Winners . 2012;13(2): 106–114.
  14. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly . 2012;36(1): 157–178.
  15. Adams WC. Conducting semi-structured interviews. In: Wholey JS, Harty HP, Newcomer KE, eds. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2015: 492–505.
  16. Badowska S, Zamojskab A, Rogalac A. Impact of performance expectancy and effort expectancy on the elderly consumers' behavior regarding acceptance and use of technological products: an empirical research in Poland. 21st Proceedings of the 21st Scientific Conference Economics and Management. 2016:174–81.
  17. Sell A, Walden P, Walden C. (2017). My wellness as a mobile app. Identifying wellness types among the young elderly. HICSS-50, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2017:1473-83.
  18. Vassli LT, Farshchian BA. Acceptance of health-related ICT among elderly people living in the community: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction . 2018;34(2): 99–116.
  19. Steel DM, Steel DM, Gray MA. Baby boomers' use and perception of recommended assistive technology: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology . 2009;4(3): 129–136.
  20. Szarvas I, Nitsch M, Lambacher O, Howe J, Reichwaldt N, Haux R. Possibilities and acceptance of mobile information technologies for the elderly—first results of an empirical study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics . 2013;192: 948.
  21. Depatie A, Bigbee JL. Rural older adult readiness to adopt mobile health technology: a descriptive study. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care . 2015;15(1): 150–184.
  22. Macedo IM. Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: an empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior . 2017;75: 935–948.
  23. De Guinea AO, Markus ML. Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly . 2009;33(3): 433–444.
  24. Göransson C, Eriksson I, Ziegert K, et al. Testing an app for reporting health concerns—experiences from older people and home care nurses. International Journal of Older People Nursing . 2018;13(2): e12181.
  25. Göransson C. Developing and Evaluating an Interactive App to Support Self-care Among Older Persons Receiving Home Care: [dissertation] . Örebro, Sweden: Örebro University; 2019.
  26. Slater PJ, Fielden PE, Bradford NK. The oncology family app: providing information and support for families caring for their child with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing . 2018;35(2): 94–102.
  27. Kapoor A, Nambisan P, Baker E. Mobile applications for breast cancer survivorship and self-management: a systematic review. Health Informatics Journal . 2020;26(4): 2892–2905.

MeSH Term

Aged
Caregivers
Family
Home Care Services
Humans
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Mobile Applications
Technology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0applicationfamilycaregivershealthcareTaiwanprovidinghome1expectancy0P=01alsofaceschallengeslong-termpopulationrapidlyagesstudyaimedconstructeffectivelymeetcaregivers'needsMixedmethodsadoptedexploreacceptancewellgathersuggestionsimprovingnonrandomizedcontrolledgrouppretest-posttestdesignutilizedparticipantsrecruitedviapurposivesamplingregionalhospitalTaipeiusedmonitormanagecaringElderlyscored5716pointshighermiddle-agedcounterpartstermsperformance61-253effort25-206respectivelyopinedconvenientusemanagingdatapatientsresourcessolutionsovercomingproblemsusingeasilywithinreachsuggestedrelevantinformationpromotingpatientmentalincludedThussoftwareacceptableregardlessageindicatingcanassistfutureperformingmanagementCaregivers'TechnologyAcceptanceIn-HomeCareManagementApp:Mixed-MethodsStudy

Similar Articles

Cited By