Effectiveness of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Haizhen Lu, Chengwen Zheng, Yanmei Zhong, Linhao Cheng, Yi Zhou
Author Information
  1. Haizhen Lu: School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan 611137, China. ORCID
  2. Chengwen Zheng: School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan 611137, China.
  3. Yanmei Zhong: School of Medical Information Engineering, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  4. Linhao Cheng: School of Foreign Languages, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  5. Yi Zhou: School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan 611137, China. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is a common gastrointestinal disease afflicting gravidas. It usually results in hospital admission in early pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: Through a meta-analysis, this study intended to explore acupuncture's clinical efficacy in treating HG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal (VIP) for published clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for treating HG was conducted from the date of database creation to 20th January 2021. We also searched grey literature in four databases: Chinese Cochrane Center, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, GreyNet International, and Open Grey from their inception to 20th January 2021. Two authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the literature with Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 and Review Manager 5.2 software. Review Manager 5.2 and STATA 12.0 software were applied to analyze data. Heterogeneity analysis was performed by the Cochran Chi-square test and statistic. Egger's tests together with funnel plots were used to identify publication bias.
RESULTS: A total of 16 trials covering 1043 gravidas were included. Compared with the conventional treatment, acupuncture had a significantly higher effective rate (OR: 8.11, 95% CI: 5.29∼12.43; < 0.00001), a higher conversion rate of urine ketone (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15∼1.60; =0.0003), an improvement rate of nausea and vomiting (OR: 26.44, 95% CI: 3.54∼197.31; =0.001), and a relatively higher improvement rate of food intake (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01∼1.36; =0.04). Acupuncture also shortened hospitalization time and manifested with a lower pregnancy termination rate and fewer adverse events. Nevertheless, no statistical variation in the improvement of nausea intensity, vomiting episodes, and lassitude symptom, recurrence rate, and serum potassium was observed.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that acupuncture was effective in treating HG. However, as the potential inferior quality and underlying publication bias were found in the included studies, there is a need for more superior-quality RCTs to examine their effectiveness and safety. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021232187.

References

  1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;22:193-220 [PMID: 7044284]
  2. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Jun;20(3):397-404 [PMID: 28064341]
  3. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005 Aug;289(2):G197-201 [PMID: 15831714]
  4. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Sep 12;5(1):62 [PMID: 31515515]
  5. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov;24(11):1307-11 [PMID: 21635201]
  6. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Oct 10;5:43 [PMID: 27766142]
  7. Auton Neurosci. 2006 Oct 30;129(1-2):107-17 [PMID: 16950659]
  8. Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Sep-Oct;11(5):527-39 [PMID: 16006438]
  9. Pract Midwife. 2016 Oct;19(9):33-35 [PMID: 30716232]
  10. Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Jan;48(1):59-68 [PMID: 12645791]
  11. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  12. Minerva Ginecol. 2005 Aug;57(4):471-5 [PMID: 16170293]
  13. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 21;25(19):2315-2326 [PMID: 31148903]
  14. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;32(1):40-51 [PMID: 28984372]
  15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Dec 20;5:100105 [PMID: 32021976]
  16. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):184-8 [PMID: 11165579]
  17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;99(10):1990-7 [PMID: 15447762]
  18. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Nov;141(1):13-7 [PMID: 18752885]
  19. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Dec;38(12):1127-1137 [PMID: 27986189]
  20. Brain Res Bull. 1992 Nov;29(5):617-34 [PMID: 1422859]
  21. BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3509 [PMID: 27338617]
  22. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):291-298 [PMID: 23232754]
  23. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 30;20(1):9 [PMID: 33516258]
  24. Complement Med Res. 2020;27(4):252-259 [PMID: 32018274]
  25. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(8):1405-1411 [PMID: 30173590]
  26. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;172(5):1585-91 [PMID: 7755076]
  27. Brain Behav. 2019 Sep;9(9):e01370 [PMID: 31359627]
  28. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Apr;34(2):226-241 [PMID: 30334272]
  29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):512.e1-512.e9 [PMID: 28188774]
  30. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(33):1-236 [PMID: 27133814]
  31. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 Dec;29(12):973-6 [PMID: 20088416]
  32. Gut. 2006 May;55(5):649-54 [PMID: 16150852]
  33. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):935 [PMID: 29683896]
  34. BJOG. 2018 Nov;125(12):1514-1521 [PMID: 29727913]
  35. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2005 Jul;25(7):469-70 [PMID: 16309132]
  36. BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(1):20-30 [PMID: 27418035]
  37. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Feb;11(1):20-3 [PMID: 15004444]
  38. BJOG. 2020 Jan;127(1):79-86 [PMID: 31483927]
  39. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;25(6):632-6 [PMID: 21916750]
  40. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Oct;20(4):273-9 [PMID: 11027909]
  41. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0rate1HG595%CI:treatingCochraneChineseacupunctureliterature0Reviewhigher=0improvementHyperemesisgravidaspregnancystudyclinicalScienceChinatrialsRCTs20thJanuary2021alsodataqualityManager2softwarepublicationbiasincludedeffectiveOR:RR:36nauseavomitingAcupunctureBACKGROUND:gravidarumcommongastrointestinaldiseaseafflictingusuallyresultshospitaladmissionearlyOBJECTIVE:meta-analysisintendedexploreacupuncture'sefficacyMATERIALSANDMETHODS:comprehensivesearchPubMedLibraryEMBASEWebNationalKnowledgeInfrastructureCNKIBiologicalMedicalCBMWanfangDatabaseTechnologyJournalVIPpublishedrandomizedcontrolledconducteddatedatabasecreationsearchedgreyfourdatabases:CenterClinicalTrialRegistryGreyNetInternationalOpenGreyinceptionTwoauthorsindependentlyscreenedextractedevaluatedHandbookSTATA12appliedanalyzeHeterogeneityanalysisperformedCochranChi-squareteststatisticEgger'steststogetherfunnelplotsusedidentifyRESULTS:total16covering1043Comparedconventionaltreatmentsignificantly81129∼1243<00001conversionurineketone15∼16000032644354∼19731001relativelyfoodintake1701∼104shortenedhospitalizationtimemanifestedlowerterminationfeweradverseeventsNeverthelessstatisticalvariationintensityepisodeslassitudesymptomrecurrenceserumpotassiumobservedCONCLUSION:suggestedHoweverpotentialinferiorunderlyingfoundstudiesneedsuperior-qualityexamineeffectivenesssafetyPROSPEROregistrationnumber:CRD42021232187EffectivenessTreatmentGravidarum:SystematicMeta-Analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By