A cross-sectional study on adaptation and initial validation of a test to evaluate health claims among high school students: Croatian version.

Diana Aranza, Boris Milavić, Ana Marusic, Magdalena Buzov, Tina Poklepović Peričić
Author Information
  1. Diana Aranza: University Department for Health Studies, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
  2. Boris Milavić: Department of Anthropological Kinesiology and Health, University of Split Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia.
  3. Ana Marusic: Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia. ORCID
  4. Magdalena Buzov: Study of Dental Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
  5. Tina Poklepović Peričić: Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia tpoklepo@mefst.hr. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We validated the Croatian version of the test using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from the Claim Evaluation Tools item bank of the Informed Health Choices project, and measured the ability of high school students to appraise health claims.
SETTING: 16 high schools from the urban agglomeration of the city of Split, Croatia.
PARTICIPANTS: Final year high school students of at least 18 years of age.
INTERVENTIONS: 18 MCQs from the item bank considered relevant for high school students were translated. After face-validity testing, the questionnaire was piloted and sent to a convenient sample of 302 high school students.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Difficulty and discrimination indices were calculated for each MCQ to determine the validity of translation and the weight of MCQs. We assessed basic metric characteristics and performed initial validation of the test. Two tests were created, the full (18 MCQs) and the short version (12 MCQs). We analysed differences in test score according to gender and school.
RESULTS: The response rate was 96% (75% female respondents). Metric characteristics of both tests were satisfactory (Cronbach's α=0.71 for the full and α=0.73 for the short version). The mean score (±SD) for the full version was 11.15±3.43 and 8.13±2.76 for the short version. There were 6 easy and 12 moderately difficult questions. Questions concerning effectiveness and dissimilar comparison groups were answered correctly by fewer than 40% of students. Female students and those from grammar and health schools scored higher on both tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Both tests showed good metric characteristics and may be used for quick and reliable assessments of adolescents' ability to appraise health claims. They may be used to identify needs and inform development of educational activities to foster critical thinking about health among adolescents.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.v15dv41wd

References

  1. Gac Med Mex. 2018;154(4):480-495 [PMID: 30250337]
  2. Nurs Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;44(3):375-84 [PMID: 19683098]
  3. Health Educ Res. 2008 Oct;23(5):840-7 [PMID: 18024979]
  4. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Aug;22(4):257-60 [PMID: 17645953]
  5. Milbank Q. 1995;73(2):187-211 [PMID: 7776945]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1335-41 [PMID: 20167411]
  7. Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7769):303-306 [PMID: 31406318]
  8. J Evid Based Med. 2019 May;12(2):140-146 [PMID: 31144466]
  9. F1000Res. 2021 Jul 30;9:179 [PMID: 38585673]
  10. J Youth Stud. 2013 Aug;16(5):579-596 [PMID: 24748849]
  11. BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e013184 [PMID: 28515181]
  12. Perm J. 2012 Winter;16(1):35-8 [PMID: 22529757]
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 08;17(4):e87 [PMID: 25858777]
  14. BMJ Open. 2017 May 25;7(5):e013185 [PMID: 28550019]
  15. F1000Res. 2018 Nov 12;7:1784 [PMID: 30631443]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):1401 [PMID: 31664973]
  17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 18;5(4):e32 [PMID: 14713660]
  19. J Evid Based Med. 2015 Aug;8(3):112-25 [PMID: 26107552]
  20. J Evid Based Med. 2015 Nov;8(4):173-80 [PMID: 26779695]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Cross-Sectional Studies
Educational Measurement
Female
Humans
Male
Reproducibility of Results
Schools
Students, Medical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0versionhighschoolstudentshealthMCQstesttestsclaims18characteristicsfullshorteducation&trainingCroatianquestionsitembankabilityappraiseschoolsmetricinitialvalidation12scoreα=0mayusedamongmedicalOBJECTIVES:validatedusingmultiple-choiceClaimEvaluationToolsInformedHealthChoicesprojectmeasuredSETTING:16urbanagglomerationcitySplitCroatiaPARTICIPANTS:FinalyearleastyearsageINTERVENTIONS:consideredrelevanttranslatedface-validitytestingquestionnairepilotedsentconvenientsample302PRIMARYANDSECONDARYOUTCOMEMEASURES:DifficultydiscriminationindicescalculatedMCQdeterminevaliditytranslationweightassessedbasicperformedTwocreatedanalyseddifferencesaccordinggenderRESULTS:responserate96%75%femalerespondentsMetricsatisfactoryCronbach's7173mean±SD1115±343 and813±2766easymoderatelydifficultQuestionsconcerningeffectivenessdissimilarcomparisongroupsansweredcorrectlyfewer40%FemalegrammarscoredhigherCONCLUSIONS:showedgoodquickreliableassessmentsadolescents'identifyneedsinformdevelopmenteducationalactivitiesfostercriticalthinkingadolescentscross-sectionalstudyadaptationevaluatestudents:seepublic

Similar Articles

Cited By