Non-RBM Mutations Impaired SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Regulated to the ACE2 Receptor Based on Molecular Dynamic Simulation.

Yaoqiang Du, Hao Wang, Linjie Chen, Quan Fang, Biqin Zhang, Luxi Jiang, Zhaoyu Wu, Yexiaoqing Yang, Ying Zhou, Bingyu Chen, Jianxin Lyu, Zhen Wang
Author Information
  1. Yaoqiang Du: Allergy Center, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Hao Wang: National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, National Children's Regional Medical Center, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University Shcool of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  3. Linjie Chen: School of Laboratory Medicine, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Quan Fang: School of Laboratory Medicine, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  5. Biqin Zhang: Department of Hematology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  6. Luxi Jiang: Allergy Center, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  7. Zhaoyu Wu: School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  8. Yexiaoqing Yang: School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  9. Ying Zhou: School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  10. Bingyu Chen: Allergy Center, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  11. Jianxin Lyu: School of Laboratory Medicine, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
  12. Zhen Wang: Allergy Center, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

The emergence of novel coronavirus mutants is a main factor behind the deterioration of the epidemic situation. Further studies into the pathogenicity of these mutants are thus urgently needed. Binding of the spinous protein receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor was shown to initiate coronavirus entry into host cells and lead to their infection. The receptor-binding motif (RBM, 438-506) is a region that directly interacts with ACE2 receptor in the RBD and plays a crucial role in determining affinity. To unravel how mutations in the non-RBM regions impact the interaction between RBD and ACE2, we selected three non-RBM mutant systems (N354D, D364Y, and V367F) from the documented clinical cases, and the Q498A mutant system located in the RBM region served as the control. Molecular dynamics simulation was conducted on the mutant systems and the wild-type (WT) system, and verified experiments also performed. Non-RBM mutations have been shown not only to change conformation of the RBM region but also to significantly influence its hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. In particular, the D364Y and V367F systems showed a higher affinity for ACE2 owing to their electrostatic interactions and polar solvation energy changes. In addition, although the binding free energy at this point increased after the mutation of N354D, the conformation of the random coil (Pro384-Asp389) was looser than that of other systems, and the combined effect weakened the binding free energy between RBD and ACE2. Interestingly, we also found a random coil (Ala475-Gly485). This random coil is very sensitive to mutations, and both types of mutations increase the binding free energy of residues in this region. We found that the binding loop (Tyr495-Tyr505) in the RBD domain strongly binds to Lys353, an important residue of the ACE2 domain previously identified. The binding free energy of the non-RBM mutant group at the binding loop had positive and negative changes, and these changes were more obvious than that of the Q498A system. The results of this study elucidate the effect of non-RBM mutation on ACE2-RBD binding, and provide new insights for SARS-CoV-2 mutation research.

Keywords

References

  1. Biopolymers. 1996 Mar;38(3):305-20 [PMID: 8906967]
  2. Annu Rev Virol. 2016 Sep 29;3(1):237-261 [PMID: 27578435]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1): [PMID: 34937699]
  4. Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 15;30(18):2681-3 [PMID: 24849577]
  5. Viruses. 2020 Jan 24;12(2): [PMID: 31991541]
  6. Nature. 2008 Jun 26;453(7199):1266-70 [PMID: 18500332]
  7. Protein Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):262-269 [PMID: 33179363]
  8. Trends Microbiol. 2016 Jun;24(6):490-502 [PMID: 27012512]
  9. Biophys J. 2010 Feb 3;98(3):386-95 [PMID: 20141751]
  10. Nature. 2020 May;581(7807):215-220 [PMID: 32225176]
  11. J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18 [PMID: 16211538]
  12. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273 [PMID: 32015507]
  13. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473 [PMID: 31986257]
  14. J Chem Theory Comput. 2006 Jan;2(1):1-11 [PMID: 26626372]
  15. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Jun;17(6):621-630 [PMID: 32415260]
  16. Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):276-8 [PMID: 12958366]
  17. Zool Res. 2020 Nov 18;41(6):705-708 [PMID: 33045776]
  18. Yi Chuan. 2020 Feb 20;42(2):212-221 [PMID: 32102777]
  19. J Virol. 2021 Jul 26;95(16):e0061721 [PMID: 34105996]
  20. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 26;5:17155 [PMID: 26607834]
  21. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec;18(6):749-759 [PMID: 33704069]
  22. Ann Biomed Eng. 1977 Dec;5(4):322-8 [PMID: 607820]
  23. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 Mar;17(3):181-192 [PMID: 30531947]
  24. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506 [PMID: 31986264]
  25. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 07;21(7): [PMID: 32272725]
  26. Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Mar 11;27(3):325-328 [PMID: 32035028]
  27. China CDC Wkly. 2020 Jan 24;2(4):61-62 [PMID: 34594763]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2499-505 [PMID: 24896817]
  29. J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Oct 24;51(10):2778-86 [PMID: 21919503]
  30. Mol Biosyst. 2017 Feb 28;13(3):585-597 [PMID: 28170013]
  31. Proteins. 2010 Jun;78(8):1950-8 [PMID: 20408171]
  32. Cell. 2020 May 14;181(4):894-904.e9 [PMID: 32275855]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bindingACE2RBDmutationsnon-RBMenergyreceptorSARS-CoV-2regionmutantsystemsfreedomainRBMsystemalsochangesmutationrandomcoilcoronavirusmutantsproteinshownaffinityN354DD364YV367FQ498AMolecularsimulationNon-RBMconformationinteractionseffectfoundloopemergencenovelmainfactorbehinddeteriorationepidemicsituationstudiespathogenicitythusurgentlyneededBindingspinousangiotensin-convertingenzyme2initiateentryhostcellsleadinfectionreceptor-bindingmotif438-506directlyinteractsplayscrucialroledeterminingunravelregionsimpactinteractionselectedthreedocumentedclinicalcaseslocatedservedcontroldynamicsconductedwild-typeWTverifiedexperimentsperformedchangesignificantlyinfluencehydrogenbondinghydrophobicparticularshowedhigherowingelectrostaticpolarsolvationadditionalthoughpointincreasedPro384-Asp389loosercombinedweakenedInterestinglyAla475-Gly485sensitivetypesincreaseresiduesTyr495-Tyr505stronglybindsLys353importantresiduepreviouslyidentifiedgrouppositivenegativeobviousresultsstudyelucidateACE2-RBDprovidenewinsightsresearchMutationsImpairedSpikeProteinRegulatedReceptorBasedDynamicSimulationmoleculardynamicspike

Similar Articles

Cited By