MEK inhibition overcomes resistance to EphA2-targeted therapy in uterine cancer.

Yutuan Wu, Jie Huang, Cristina Ivan, Yunjie Sun, Shaolin Ma, Lingegowda S Mangala, Bryan M Fellman, Diana L Urbauer, Nicholas B Jennings, Prahlad Ram, Robert L Coleman, Wei Hu, Anil K Sood
Author Information
  1. Yutuan Wu: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  2. Jie Huang: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  3. Cristina Ivan: Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  4. Yunjie Sun: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  5. Shaolin Ma: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  6. Lingegowda S Mangala: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  7. Bryan M Fellman: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  8. Diana L Urbauer: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  9. Nicholas B Jennings: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  10. Prahlad Ram: Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  11. Robert L Coleman: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  12. Wei Hu: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: weihu@mdanderson.org.
  13. Anil K Sood: Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: asood@mdanderson.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our pilot clinical study of EphA2 inhibitor (dasatinib) plus paclitaxel and carboplatin showed interesting clinical activity in endometrial cancer with manageable toxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms of dasatinib resistance in uterine cancer are unknown. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms underlying resistance to EphA2 inhibitors in uterine cancer and examined the anti-tumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors alone and in combination with a MEK inhibitor.
METHODS: We evaluated the antitumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors plus a MEK inhibitor using in vitro and in vivo orthotopic models of uterine cancer.
RESULTS: EphA2 inhibitor induced MAPK in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells (HEC-1A and Ishikawa) and BRAF/CRAF heterodimerization in HEC-1A cells. EphA2 inhibitor and trametinib significantly increased apoptosis in cancer cells resistant to EphA2 inhibitors compared with controls (p < 0.01). An in vivo study with the orthotopic HEC-1A model showed significantly greater antitumor response to combination treatment compared with dasatinib alone (p < 0.01). Combination treatment increased EphrinA1 and BIM along with decreased pMAPK, Jagged 1, and c-MYC expression in dasatinib-resistant cells. In addition, Spearman analysis using the TCGA data revealed that upregulation of EphA2 was significantly correlated with JAG1, MYC, NOTCH1, NOTCH3 and HES1 expression (p < 0.001, r = 0.25-0.43). Specifically, MAP3K15 and the NOTCH family genes were significantly related to poor clinical outcome in patients with uterine cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the MAPK pathway is activated in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells and that EphrinA1-mediated MEK inhibition overcomes dasatinib resistance. Dual targeting of both EphA2 and MEK, combined with chemotherapy, should be considered for future clinical development.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 15;74(12):3282-93 [PMID: 24743243]
  2. ACS Chem Biol. 2016 Dec 16;11(12):3400-3411 [PMID: 27768280]
  3. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 May;3(5):527-30 [PMID: 11331884]
  4. Clin Proteomics. 2010 Dec;6(4):129-51 [PMID: 21691416]
  5. Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;76(2):305-18 [PMID: 26744526]
  6. Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1 [PMID: 23550210]
  7. Oncogene. 2010 Jan 28;29(4):589-96 [PMID: 19881544]
  8. J Clin Invest. 2014 May;124(5):2037-49 [PMID: 24713656]
  9. Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15 [PMID: 21720365]
  10. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2005 Dec;9(6):1179-87 [PMID: 16300469]
  11. ChemMedChem. 2017 Jun 21;12(12):999-1011 [PMID: 28544567]
  12. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Apr 1;20(7):1846-55 [PMID: 24486585]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1714-9 [PMID: 23319603]
  14. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Apr;161(1):104-112 [PMID: 33551196]
  15. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):2981-2992 [PMID: 32167863]
  16. Cancer Cell. 2005 Aug;8(2):111-8 [PMID: 16098464]
  17. Oncogene. 2008 May 1;27(20):2934-40 [PMID: 18059341]
  18. Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4 [PMID: 22588877]
  19. BMC Genomics. 2012 Jun 25;13:282 [PMID: 22732065]
  20. Microsc Res Tech. 2002 Oct 1;59(1):58-67 [PMID: 12242697]
  21. Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):427-30 [PMID: 20179705]
  22. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Nov 1;98(21):1558-70 [PMID: 17077358]
  23. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;2(2):62-9 [PMID: 10655584]
  24. Cancer Cell. 2018 Apr 9;33(4):690-705.e9 [PMID: 29622464]
  25. Nat Commun. 2014 May 29;5:3887 [PMID: 24871328]
  26. Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 1;65(15):6910-8 [PMID: 16061675]
  27. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010 Dec 15;10(12):1306-14 [PMID: 20948320]
  28. Cancer Cell. 2009 Jul 7;16(1):9-20 [PMID: 19573808]

Grants

  1. P30 CA016672/NCI NIH HHS
  2. P50 CA098258/NCI NIH HHS
  3. P50 CA217685/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Apoptosis
Cell Line, Tumor
Dasatinib
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Humans
MAP Kinase Signaling System
Mice
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
Pyridones
Pyrimidinones
Receptor, EphA2
Uterine Neoplasms

Chemicals

Pyridones
Pyrimidinones
trametinib
Receptor, EphA2
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
Dasatinib

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EphA2cancerinhibitoruterineMEKcellsclinicaldasatinibresistanceinhibitorssignificantly0activitydasatinib-resistantHEC-1Ap<studyplusshowedunderlyingmechanismsalonecombinationantitumorusingvivoorthotopicMAPKincreasedcompared01treatmentexpressioninhibitionovercomesBACKGROUND:pilotpaclitaxelcarboplatininterestingendometrialmanageabletoxicityHoweverunknowninvestigatedpotentialexaminedanti-tumorMETHODS:evaluatedvitromodelsRESULTS:inducedIshikawaBRAF/CRAFheterodimerizationtrametinibapoptosisresistantcontrolsmodelgreaterresponseCombinationEphrinA1BIMalongdecreasedpMAPKJagged1c-MYCadditionSpearmananalysisTCGAdatarevealedupregulationcorrelatedJAG1MYCNOTCH1NOTCH3HES1001r=25-043SpecificallyMAP3K15NOTCHfamilygenesrelatedpooroutcomepatientsCONCLUSIONS:findingsindicatepathwayactivatedEphrinA1-mediatedDualtargetingcombinedchemotherapyconsideredfuturedevelopmentEphA2-targetedtherapyDasatinibUterine

Similar Articles

Cited By