Association Between Chemotherapy and Survival in T1 Colon Cancer With Lymph Node Metastasis: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

Wangxin Yan, Huizhen Zhou, Si Shi, Jixu Lin, Qiangkang Lin
Author Information
  1. Wangxin Yan: Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou No. 3 Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  2. Huizhen Zhou: Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou No. 3 Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  3. Si Shi: Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou No. 3 Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  4. Jixu Lin: Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou No. 3 Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  5. Qiangkang Lin: Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou No. 3 Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Abstract

This study aimed to comprehensively examine the efficacy of chemotherapy in T1 colon cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.
METHODS: The differences in categorical variables in colon cancer patients according to lymph node status were evaluated by Pearson's chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were built, multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to identify the potential independent prognostic factors. Propensity score matching was also undertaken to adjust for treatment bias due to measured confounders.
RESULTS: Younger age (52.2% VS. 43.0% for ≤ 65 years old, p < 0.001), female gender (50.3% VS. 46.8% for female, p < 0.001), more lymph nodes harvested (68.1% VS. 46.6% for ≥12 lymph nodes harvested, p < 0.001), Black race (13.6% VS. 12.0% for the Black race, p < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (14.2% VS. 5.6% for grade III/IV, p < 0.001) were more prone to be diagnosed with lymph node involvement. The receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical surgery significantly reduced the risk of colon cancer-specific mortality by 33.9% after propensity-score matching (HR = 0.661, 95%CI = 0.476-0.917, p = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, female gender, more lymph nodes harvested, Black race, and higher tumor grade were more prone to be diagnosed with lymph node involvement. The receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical surgery also significantly decreased the risk of colon cancer-specific mortality by 33.9% in T1 colon cancer with lymph node involvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;10(3):231-8 [PMID: 18257848]
  2. Ann Surg. 1979 Dec;190(6):679-83 [PMID: 518167]
  3. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):489-98 [PMID: 19414526]
  4. Gut. 2009 Jan;58(1):90-6 [PMID: 18832519]
  5. J Cancer. 2019 May 12;10(9):2102-2108 [PMID: 31205571]
  6. Endoscopy. 1997 Sep;29(7):626-31 [PMID: 9360872]
  7. World J Surg. 1991 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-40 [PMID: 1994604]
  8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986 Apr;1(2):79-84 [PMID: 3611938]
  9. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jan;111(1):51-8 [PMID: 9894454]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2343-51 [PMID: 15175436]
  11. N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 8;322(6):352-8 [PMID: 2300087]
  12. J Dig Dis. 2019 Jun;20(6):288-293 [PMID: 31021492]
  13. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):627-32 [PMID: 27270724]
  14. Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 15;68(20):8541-6 [PMID: 18922929]
  15. Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4030-4040 [PMID: 31620912]
  16. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jul;14(7):1074-80 [PMID: 20431977]
  17. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):303-10 [PMID: 24509451]
  18. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):6 [PMID: 32037496]
  19. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):1032-9; discussion 1039-40 [PMID: 15585391]
  20. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Jun;28(4):413-7 [PMID: 12099652]
  21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1958-1964 [PMID: 28130621]
  22. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Oct;35(10):1911-1919 [PMID: 32548720]
  23. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Feb;45(2):200-6 [PMID: 11852333]
  24. BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):803 [PMID: 31412872]
  25. Cancer Biomark. 2018;22(1):161-168 [PMID: 29562502]
  26. World J Surg. 2000 Sep;24(9):1029-35 [PMID: 11036278]
  27. Mod Pathol. 2012 Aug;25(8):1128-39 [PMID: 22481281]
  28. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1182-92 [PMID: 15793641]
  29. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4405-15 [PMID: 26895892]
  30. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2432-41 [PMID: 9196159]
  31. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424 [PMID: 30207593]
  32. Am J Med. 1999 May;106(5):574-82 [PMID: 10335731]
  33. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Dec;29(12):825-30 [PMID: 3491746]
  34. Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1304-1310 [PMID: 31228203]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lymph0colonpnodeVS<001chemotherapyT1cancersurvivalfemalenodesharvested6%Blackracegradeinvolvement=patientstestCoxHRscorematchingalsoYoungerage2%0%gender46highertumorpronediagnosedreceiptadjuvantfollowingradicalsurgerysignificantlyriskcancer-specificmortality339%studyaimedcomprehensivelyexamineefficacymetastasisMETHODS:differencescategoricalvariablesaccordingstatusevaluatedPearson'schi-squareKaplan-MeiermethodusedassessCancer-specificCSSoverallOSlog-rankproportionalhazardsmodelsbuiltmultivariateregressionanalysesperformedhazardratio95%confidenceintervalCIidentifypotentialindependentprognosticfactorsPropensityundertakenadjusttreatmentbiasduemeasuredconfoundersRESULTS:524365yearsold503%8%681%≥121312145III/IVreducedpropensity-score66195%CI476-0917013CONCLUSIONS:decreasedAssociationChemotherapySurvivalColonCancerLymphNodeMetastasis:Propensity-ScoreMatchedAnalysispropensity

Similar Articles

Cited By