Bullying Victimization and Life Satisfaction Among Rural Left-Behind Children in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yide Yang, Chanjuan Zheng, Ming Xie, Shuqian Yuan, Yuan Zeng, Meiling Zhou, Shuzhen Huang, Yulian Zhu, Xiangli Ye, Zhiyong Zou, Ying Wang, Julien Steven Baker
Author Information
  1. Yide Yang: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  2. Chanjuan Zheng: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  3. Ming Xie: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  4. Shuqian Yuan: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  5. Yuan Zeng: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  6. Meiling Zhou: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  7. Shuzhen Huang: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  8. Yulian Zhu: Hunan Preventive and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Changsha, China.
  9. Xiangli Ye: Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  10. Zhiyong Zou: Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  11. Ying Wang: Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  12. Julien Steven Baker: Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Centre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the associations between bullying victimization and life satisfaction in primary school children and also investigate the interactive effects of left-behind status and bullying victimization on life satisfaction. Bullying victimization was measured using the Chinese version of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Life satisfaction was assessed using the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS). Life satisfaction is composed of five domains, namely, family, school, friends, environment, and self-satisfaction. Left-behind status of rural children was defined as one or both their parents migrating to working in cities. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests, Chi-square tests, and multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses. A total of 810 primary school children were involved, of which 8.5% reported bullying victimization, and 44.3% were left-behind children (LBC). We found that bullying victimization was negatively associated with all domains of life satisfaction (all < 0.05). With further left-behind status-stratified analysis, we found that negative association between bullying victimization and friend satisfaction was more profound in the LBC group than in the non-LBC group [b(SE)= -0.133 (0.03) vs. -0.061 (0.026) for LBC and non-LBC, respectively, < 0.05]. When further interaction analysis was conducted, we identified interaction effects between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction ( = 0.048). Similar interaction effect between bullying victimization and left-behind status on school satisfaction was also found ( = 0.004). Bullying victimization was associated with low life satisfaction (including lower family, friends, school, self, and environment satisfaction). There were significant interactions between left-behind status and bullying victimization on friend satisfaction, as well as school satisfaction. Left-behind status of children may exaggerate the impact of bullying victimization on friends/school satisfaction rating.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Sep;1(1):19-26 [PMID: 30169221]
  2. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Jun 01;31(6):2752-63 [PMID: 26040392]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 25;14(10): [PMID: 28946682]
  4. Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;57:132-9 [PMID: 25465652]
  5. J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jun;48(6):1146-1160 [PMID: 30835034]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 01;17(23): [PMID: 33271852]
  7. Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Oct;96:104072 [PMID: 31319239]
  8. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 07;10:40 [PMID: 30792670]
  9. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:608359 [PMID: 33643136]
  10. BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 25;15:966 [PMID: 26407623]
  11. Lancet. 2018 Feb 21;391 Suppl 2:S14 [PMID: 29553411]
  12. J Fluency Disord. 2016 Dec;50:72-84 [PMID: 27865231]
  13. J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jun;34(11):2363-2375 [PMID: 29911464]
  14. J Res Health Sci. 2019 Jan 09;19(1):e00436 [PMID: 31133626]
  15. Coll Antropol. 2014 Mar;38(1):21-9 [PMID: 24851593]
  16. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Aug;61(2):179-186 [PMID: 28391968]
  17. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2530 [PMID: 26844460]
  18. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):207 [PMID: 30537963]
  19. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jan;30(1):21-5 [PMID: 19565842]
  20. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 Oct;16(10):1164-72 [PMID: 18523454]
  21. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2663-2686 [PMID: 31583944]
  22. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Aug;33(7):751-60 [PMID: 18356185]
  23. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jan-Feb;48(1):166-178 [PMID: 30556737]
  24. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Oct;16(5):781-9 [PMID: 23546615]
  25. Biomed Environ Sci. 2010 Apr;23(2):108-12 [PMID: 20514985]
  26. JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2094-100 [PMID: 11311098]
  27. Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2567-2582 [PMID: 30528471]
  28. Acta Paediatr. 2014 Jun;103(6):665-70 [PMID: 24527673]
  29. PeerJ. 2018 Jun 4;6:e4865 [PMID: 29888125]
  30. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(6):557-565 [PMID: 31268050]
  31. Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;8:506191 [PMID: 33363073]
  32. BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):1059 [PMID: 30139363]
  33. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121602 [PMID: 25811479]
  34. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):354-380 [PMID: 29294894]
  35. Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Oct;113(2):353-64 [PMID: 22185050]
  36. J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Feb;43(2):221-32 [PMID: 23695412]
  37. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Jun;28(6):562-6 [PMID: 17939385]
  38. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:751-80 [PMID: 23297789]
  39. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):87-96 [PMID: 11726683]
  40. Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1187-94 [PMID: 15121928]
  41. J Interpers Violence. 2020 May 21;:886260520922373 [PMID: 32438881]
  42. Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jul;48(5):502-510 [PMID: 30672390]
  43. Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):206-21 [PMID: 20658375]
  44. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 May;21(5):287-293 [PMID: 29762059]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0satisfactionvictimizationbullyingschoolchildrenleft-behindstatus0lifeLifeprimaryeffectsBullyingusingLBCfoundfriend=interactionalsointeractiveSatisfactiondomainsfamilyfriendsenvironmentLeft-behindtestsassociated<analysisgroupnon-LBC-0studyaimedevaluateassociationsinvestigatemeasuredChineseversionrevisedOlweusBully/VictimQuestionnaireassessedMultidimensionalStudents'ScaleMSLSScomposedfivenamelyself-satisfactionruraldefinedoneparentsmigratingworkingcitiesdataanalyzedMann-WhitneyChi-squaremultivariatelinearlogisticregressionanalysestotal810involved85%reported443%negatively05status-stratifiednegativeassociationprofound[bSE13303vs061026respectively05]conductedidentified048Similareffect004lowincludinglowerselfsignificantinteractionswellmayexaggerateimpactfriends/schoolratingVictimizationAmongRuralLeft-BehindChildrenChina:Cross-SectionalStudyleftbehind

Similar Articles

Cited By