Predictive Value of Serum Cytokeratin 19 Level for the Feasibility of Conserving Ovaries in Endometrial Cancer.

Jie Xu, Can Chen, Jing Xiong, Hui Wang, Hua Linghu
Author Information
  1. Jie Xu: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  2. Can Chen: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu, China.
  3. Jing Xiong: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
  4. Hui Wang: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  5. Hua Linghu: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Abstract

To determine the predictive value of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) for evaluating the safety of ovarian preservation in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Five hundred and seventeen EC patients hospitalized from November 2010 to June 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Pre-operative tumor biomarkers including CA125, HE4, CK19, and CA19-9 were obtained. Predictive biomarkers associated with ovarian metastasis were selected using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression. The cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression model was used to perform survival analysis. Among clinical parameters and biomarkers included, age > 65, type II EC, CA125 ≥ 35 u/ml, CK19 > 3.3 ng/ml, and myometrial invasion ≥ 50% depth appeared as significant predictors of the risk of ovarian involvement in univariable logistic analysis. In multivariable analysis, CK19 > 3.3 ng/ml (OR = 11.541, 95%CI: 1.968-67.668, = 0.007) and Type II EC (OR = 8.336, 95%CI: 1.456-47.722, = 0.017) were independent risk predictors of ovarian metastasis in pre-menopausal women. In pre-menopausal women with Type I EC ( = 142), CK19 level could satisfactorily predict the risk of ovarian metastasis (AUC = 0.860, 95%CI: 0.792-0.912, < 0.001), and when the cut-off point was set as 2.45 ng/ml, the negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio were 99% and 0.19, with the maximum Youden index of 0.598. The present study advocates the necessity of incorporating serum CK19 measurement into the pre-operative evaluation of EC, especially as extension of current standard approach with ovarian preservation counseling.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2607-18 [PMID: 23733771]
  2. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):886-889 [PMID: 30826751]
  3. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 Jan;17(1):9-18 [PMID: 27892774]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):303-311 [PMID: 26801941]
  5. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Aug;126(2):176-9 [PMID: 22507532]
  6. Maturitas. 2010 Sep;67(1):46-53 [PMID: 20510555]
  7. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013 Sep;56(5):281-8 [PMID: 24328017]
  8. Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jun 03;9:3381-6 [PMID: 27350753]
  9. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):532-5 [PMID: 26186908]
  10. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):761-70 [PMID: 27607873]
  11. Prz Menopauzalny. 2016 Nov;15(3):133-137 [PMID: 27980523]
  12. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):782-7 [PMID: 23830105]
  13. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):424-433 [PMID: 25569000]
  14. Biomark Med. 2013 Aug;7(4):591-9 [PMID: 23905896]
  15. Oncotarget. 2016 May 24;7(21):30962-76 [PMID: 27121063]
  16. Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;123(2):263-272 [PMID: 28067948]
  17. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jan;27(1):77-84 [PMID: 27922977]
  18. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Apr;94(4):430-4 [PMID: 25603833]
  19. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;47(6):445-51 [PMID: 22932112]
  20. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;106(4):693-9 [PMID: 16199623]
  21. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):159-65 [PMID: 24211402]
  22. Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 25;115(9):e15 [PMID: 27711084]
  23. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):58-63 [PMID: 28099710]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CK19ovarian0EC=biomarkers319metastasisanalysis>ng/mlrisk95%CI:predictivevaluepreservationpatientsendometrialcancerCA125Predictivemultivariateregressioncut-offIIpredictorsOR1Typepre-menopausalwomennegativepre-operativedeterminecytokeratinevaluatingsafetyFivehundredseventeenhospitalizedNovember2010June2016reviewedretrospectivelyPre-operativetumorincludingHE4CA19-9obtainedassociatedselectedusingunivariateLogisticvaluesdeterminedreceiveroperatingcharacteristicROCcurvesKaplan-MeiermethodCoxmodelusedperformsurvivalAmongclinicalparametersincludedage65type35u/mlmyometrialinvasion50%depthappearedsignificantinvolvementunivariablelogisticmultivariable11541968-676680078336456-47722017independent142levelsatisfactorilypredictAUC860792-0912<001pointset245likelihoodratio99%maximumYoudenindex598presentstudyadvocatesnecessityincorporatingserummeasurementevaluationespeciallyextensioncurrentstandardapproachcounselingValueSerumCytokeratinLevelFeasibilityConservingOvariesEndometrialCancerconservationprognosticfactors

Similar Articles

Cited By