The influence of patient perception of physician empathy on patient satisfaction among attending physicians working with residents in an emergent care setting.

Ryan Kirby, Heidi C Knowles, Anant Patel, Naomi Alanis, Colton Rice, James P d'Etienne, Chet D Schrader, Nestor R Zenarosa, Hao Wang
Author Information
  1. Ryan Kirby: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  2. Heidi C Knowles: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  3. Anant Patel: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  4. Naomi Alanis: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA. ORCID
  5. Colton Rice: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  6. James P d'Etienne: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  7. Chet D Schrader: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  8. Nestor R Zenarosa: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA.
  9. Hao Wang: Department of Emergency Medicine John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth Texas USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the patient's perception of attending physician empathy and the patient's satisfaction can be affected when attending physicians work alongside residents. We aim to determine the influence residents may have on (1) patient perception of attending physician empathy and (2) patient satisfaction as it relates to their respective attending physicians.
METHODS: This is a prospective single-center observational study. Patient perception of physician empathy was measured using Jefferson Scale of Patient Perception of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) in both attendings and residents in the Emergency Department. Patient satisfaction with attending physicians and residents was measured by real-time patient satisfaction survey. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the association between patient satisfaction and JSPPPE after patient demographics, attending physician different experience, and residents with different years of training were adjusted.
RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were enrolled. Mean JSPPPE scores were 30.1 among attending working alone, 30.1 in attending working with PGY-1 EM residents, 29.6 in attending working with PGY-2, and 27.8 in attending working with PGY-3 ( < 0.05). Strong correlation occurred between attending JSPPPE score and patient satisfaction to attending physicians ( > 0.5). The adjusted odds ratio was 1.32 (95% CI 1.23-1.41,  < 0.001) on attending's JSPPPE score predicting patient satisfaction to the attending physicians. However, there were no significant differences on patient satisfaction among four different groups.
CONCLUSION: Empathy has strong correlation with patient satisfaction. Decreased patient perception of attending physician empathy was found when working with senior residents in comparison to working alone or with junior residents.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0204113 [PMID: 30212564]
  2. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e76-84 [PMID: 23336477]
  3. Med Sci Monit. 2007 Jul;13(7):CR291-4 [PMID: 17599021]
  4. Eval Health Prof. 2004 Sep;27(3):237-51 [PMID: 15312283]
  5. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 15;13:1145-1152 [PMID: 31409977]
  6. J Clin Med Res. 2019 Jul;11(7):532-538 [PMID: 31236173]
  7. Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1379-1384 [PMID: 30919198]
  8. J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):600-606 [PMID: 33062884]
  9. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):238-247 [PMID: 30767955]
  10. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e029356 [PMID: 31243037]
  11. J Family Community Med. 2019 Sep-Dec;26(3):199-205 [PMID: 31572051]
  12. Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):290-296 [PMID: 33239313]
  13. Croat Med J. 2007 Feb;48(1):81-6 [PMID: 17309143]
  14. Fam Med. 2011 Jun;43(6):412-7 [PMID: 21656396]
  15. J Patient Exp. 2017 Jun;4(2):78-83 [PMID: 28725866]
  16. J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan - Feb;75(1):88-94 [PMID: 28716384]
  17. Health Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;4(3):e337 [PMID: 34430711]
  18. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):359-64 [PMID: 21248604]
  19. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):280-8 [PMID: 18815493]
  20. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 12;2020:9379756 [PMID: 32104709]
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):296-301 [PMID: 30801368]
  22. BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717 [PMID: 22434089]
  23. Acad Pediatr. 2021 Jan-Feb;21(1):165-169 [PMID: 32540426]
  24. J Health Commun. 2018;23(2):129-143 [PMID: 29281593]
  25. Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):105-11 [PMID: 25558813]
  26. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 01;29(5):722-727 [PMID: 28992161]
  27. Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):996-1009 [PMID: 21670661]
  28. J Nurs Meas. 2017 Aug 1;25(2):152-161 [PMID: 28789745]
  29. Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1464-1471 [PMID: 28379929]
  30. PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156076 [PMID: 27228056]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attendingpatientsatisfactionresidentsphysiciansworkingphysicianempathyperception1JSPPPEPatientdifferentamongpatient'sdetermineinfluencemeasuredEmpathyadjusted30alone< 0correlationscoreBACKGROUND:unclearwhethercanaffectedworkalongsideaimmay2relatesrespectiveMETHODS:prospectivesingle-centerobservationalstudyusingJeffersonScalePerceptionPhysicianattendingsEmergencyDepartmentreal-timesurveyMultivariatelogisticregressionsperformedassociationdemographicsexperienceyearstrainingRESULTS:total351patientsenrolledMeanscoresPGY-1EM296PGY-2278PGY-305Strongoccurred > 05oddsratio3295%CI23-141001attending'spredictingHoweversignificantdifferencesfourgroupsCONCLUSION:strongDecreasedfoundseniorcomparisonjunioremergentcaresetting

Similar Articles

Cited By