Identifying the determinants of COVID-19 preventative behaviors and vaccine intentions among South Carolina residents.

Justin Travis, Scott Harris, Tina Fadel, Ginny Webb
Author Information
  1. Justin Travis: Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, United States of America.
  2. Scott Harris: Department of History, Political Science, Philosophy, & American Studies, University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, United States of America.
  3. Tina Fadel: Division of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, United States of America.
  4. Ginny Webb: Division of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented a global pandemic in 2020 and 2021, and has therefore spurred a flurry of research, whether related directly to the disease and its treatment or regarding its spread, containment, and effect on everyday lives. In particular, two pressing streams of research have investigated antecedents to COVID-19 preventative behaviors and vaccination intentions. This nascent research has led to many interesting and practically important findings, however, there remains many segmented, compartmentalized studies that address topics that, while certainly generative and meaningful, may not provide a full lens to possible antecedents. The current study takes an interdisciplinary approach that investigates commonly studied variables from biology and public health, political science, and psychology as they relate to COVID-19 preventative behaviors and vaccine intentions in a stratified sample of South Carolina residents (N = 1695). Results from correlations and multiple regression substantiated the findings of many previous studies, however, it was found that, when controlling for shared variance among predictors via relative weights analysis, COVID-19 knowledge, trust in science, age, and Trump approval were the strongest predictors of preventative behaviors. Alternatively, trust in science, gender, age, and conservatism were the strongest predictors of vaccine intentions. Understanding the variables that contribute to the practice of preventative behaviors and vaccine intentions can be used by public health officials to better target and tailor their educational campaign in the community.

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29;10(1):15956 [PMID: 32994437]
  2. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 15;6(3):e22060 [PMID: 32930670]
  3. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228 [PMID: 33082575]
  4. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e2012403 [PMID: 32556260]
  5. Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):387-99 [PMID: 19968399]
  6. Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;16(10):1745-1752 [PMID: 32226294]
  7. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113638 [PMID: 33414032]
  8. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1270-1285 [PMID: 32864837]
  9. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 8;6(2):e19161 [PMID: 32369759]
  10. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240785 [PMID: 33057375]
  11. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 [PMID: 33397962]
  12. JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):223-224 [PMID: 33393964]
  13. J Public Health Policy. 2020 Dec;41(4):399-409 [PMID: 32747704]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Sep;43(3):623-36 [PMID: 7131245]
  15. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):775-779 [PMID: 32785815]
  16. JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793 [PMID: 32648899]
  17. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0248334 [PMID: 33690672]
  18. Vaccine. 2021 Feb 12;39(7):1080-1086 [PMID: 33461833]
  19. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596 [PMID: 33826646]
  20. Vaccine. 2017 Feb 22;35(8):1167-1174 [PMID: 28126202]
  21. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110706 [PMID: 33551529]
  22. Vaccine. 2021 Jan 29;39(5):825-829 [PMID: 33390295]
  23. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-12 [PMID: 32479113]
  24. J Community Health. 2021 Apr;46(2):270-277 [PMID: 33389421]
  25. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):693-699 [PMID: 33821089]
  26. Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 6;7(2): [PMID: 33310734]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4): [PMID: 33431650]
  28. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594 [PMID: 33079199]
  29. Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55 [PMID: 22506584]
  30. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110697 [PMID: 33531725]
  31. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118 [PMID: 38602949]
  32. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):486-496 [PMID: 33362344]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
COVID-19
COVID-19 Vaccines
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Politics
SARS-CoV-2
Sex Factors
South Carolina
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vaccination

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19preventativebehaviorsintentionsvaccineresearchmanysciencepredictorsdiseaseantecedentsfindingshoweverstudiesvariablespublichealthSouthCarolinaresidentsamongtrustagestrongestCoronavirus2019presentedglobalpandemic20202021thereforespurredflurrywhetherrelateddirectlytreatmentregardingspreadcontainmenteffecteverydaylivesparticulartwopressingstreamsinvestigatedvaccinationnascentledinterestingpracticallyimportantremainssegmentedcompartmentalizedaddresstopicscertainlygenerativemeaningfulmayprovidefulllenspossiblecurrentstudytakesinterdisciplinaryapproachinvestigatescommonlystudiedbiologypoliticalpsychologyrelatestratifiedsampleN=1695ResultscorrelationsmultipleregressionsubstantiatedpreviousfoundcontrollingsharedvarianceviarelativeweightsanalysisknowledgeTrumpapprovalAlternativelygenderconservatismUnderstandingcontributepracticecanusedofficialsbettertargettailoreducationalcampaigncommunityIdentifyingdeterminants

Similar Articles

Cited By