Participatory Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the User-Friendly Patient Information Material Checklist (UPIM-Check).

Sandra Salm, Judith Mollenhauer, Carolin Hornbach, Natalia Cecon, Antje Dresen, Stefanie Houwaart, Anna Arning, Andrea Göttel, Kathrin Schwickerath, Holger Pfaff, Nadine Scholten, Theresia Krieger
Author Information
  1. Sandra Salm: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany. ORCID
  2. Judith Mollenhauer: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  3. Carolin Hornbach: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  4. Natalia Cecon: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  5. Antje Dresen: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  6. Stefanie Houwaart: House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany (HKSH-BV), Thomas-Mann-Str. 40, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
  7. Anna Arning: Cancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  8. Andrea Göttel: Cancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  9. Kathrin Schwickerath: Cancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  10. Holger Pfaff: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany. ORCID
  11. Nadine Scholten: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  12. Theresia Krieger: Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to design a user-friendly instrument to assess and optimize patient information material (PIM), (2) to develop an English version, and (3) to test its psychometric properties. The instrument was needed to optimize the top-down developed PIM of the psycho-oncological care programme isPO. First, a literature-based PIM checklist was developed by a team of patient representatives, cancer care experts and professional researchers. Next, the checklist's reliability and validity were analysed by having cancer survivors assess the initial and optimized version of the isPO-leaflet. The , developed participatorily, was found to be effective for evaluating PIM. It uses a traffic light scale, and suggestions for improvement can be given for each criterion. Its reliability appeared to be excellent (α = 0.927). The optimized leaflet was rated significantly better than the initial one. The UPIM-Check is a reliable and valid instrument, which enables end-users (e.g., patients) to assess and optimize the quality of PIM according to scientific criteria and the needs of end-users. A bottom-up approach was essential for developing and validating the UPIM-Check. End-users constantly contributed with their specific knowledge. Thus, their position as co-researchers was significantly strengthened.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89 [PMID: 24568690]
  2. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):202-9 [PMID: 24290242]
  3. Health Expect. 2004 Jun;7(2):165-75 [PMID: 15117391]
  4. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Jul;47(3):273-5 [PMID: 12088606]
  5. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325-50 [PMID: 18173388]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4): [PMID: 35206155]
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):543 [PMID: 35459202]
  8. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):760-767 [PMID: 29736794]
  9. Cancer Med J. 2021 Apr 1;4(1):38-43 [PMID: 32601623]
  10. BMC Urol. 2019 May 28;19(1):42 [PMID: 31138209]
  11. Breast. 2016 Feb;25:34-7 [PMID: 26547835]
  12. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2229-38 [PMID: 19686403]
  13. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):531 [PMID: 35449058]
  14. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11 [PMID: 10396471]
  15. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e034141 [PMID: 32156765]
  16. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2013 May;63(5):176-84 [PMID: 23446824]
  17. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):564-567 [PMID: 30502104]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(16): [PMID: 32823889]
  19. Trials. 2018 Sep 18;19(1):503 [PMID: 30227890]
  20. Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55 [PMID: 28029643]
  21. BMC Med. 2011 Jul 21;9:89 [PMID: 21777435]
  22. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Jul;46(4):218-28 [PMID: 24597957]
  23. Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):901-906 [PMID: 32584954]
  24. Patient Educ Couns. 1995 Sep;26(1-3):139-44 [PMID: 7494713]
  25. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):275-80 [PMID: 15530765]
  26. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 May;23(5):566-9 [PMID: 19175488]
  27. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403 [PMID: 24973195]
  28. Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316 [PMID: 30761699]

MeSH Term

Checklist
Humans
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0instrumentPIMpatientassessoptimizedevelopedUPIM-Checkstudyinformationmaterialversionpsychometricpropertiescarecancerreliabilityinitialoptimizedsignificantlyend-usersqualityengagementaims1designuser-friendly2developEnglish3testneededtop-downpsycho-oncologicalprogrammeisPOFirstliterature-basedchecklistteamrepresentativesexpertsprofessionalresearchersNextchecklist'svalidityanalysedsurvivorsisPO-leafletparticipatorilyfoundeffectiveevaluatingusestrafficlightscalesuggestionsimprovementcangivencriterionappearedexcellentα=0927leafletratedbetteronereliablevalidenablesegpatientsaccordingscientificcriterianeedsbottom-upapproachessentialdevelopingvalidatingEnd-usersconstantlycontributedspecificknowledgeThuspositionco-researchersstrengthenedParticipatoryDevelopmentPreliminaryPsychometricPropertiesUser-FriendlyPatientInformationMaterialChecklistdevelopmentpilotassessmentserviceprovider

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)