Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mind-Body Activity Program for Older Adults With Chronic Pain and Cognitive Decline: The Virtual "Active Brains" Study.

James D Doorley, Ryan A Mace, Paula J Popok, Victoria A Grunberg, Anya Ragnhildstveit, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Author Information
  1. James D Doorley: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  2. Ryan A Mace: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  3. Paula J Popok: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  4. Victoria A Grunberg: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  5. Anya Ragnhildstveit: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  6. Ana-Maria Vranceanu: Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain (CP) and cognitive decline (CD) are highly comorbid and debilitating among older adults. We iteratively developed Active Brains-Fitbit (AB-F), a group mind-body activity program aided by a Fitbit that is feasible and associated with improvements in physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning when delivered in-person to older adults with CP and CD. We adapted our intervention and methodology for remote delivery to bypass barriers to participation. Here we report on a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the virtual AB-F versus a Health Enhancement Program (HEP) educational control followed by qualitative exit interviews.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Older adults (aged ≥60) with CP and CD (2 cohorts) completed 8 weeks of AB-F (n = 8) or HEP (n = 11). Study procedures were fully remote via live video. Quantitative analyses explored feasibility and acceptability markers and within-group improvements in outcomes. Qualitative analyses were primarily deductive using the Framework Method.
RESULTS: AB-F met a priori set feasibility benchmarks, similar to our in-person pilot. Participation in AB-F was associated with preliminary signals of improvement in multimodal physical function, emotional function (anxiety), cognitive function, pain intensity, and coping (e.g., pain self-efficacy, catastrophizing). Participation in HEP was associated with smaller or negligible improvements. Exit interviews confirmed feasibility and satisfaction with our completely remote interventions and methodology.
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Results provide evidence for the feasibility of our completely remote study and for initial markers of improvement after AB-F. The results will inform a fully powered remote efficacy trial.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04044183.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT04044183

References

  1. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844-52 [PMID: 24798886]
  2. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443 [PMID: 20188472]
  3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117 [PMID: 24047204]
  4. Aging Ment Health. 2020 Apr;24(4):642-648 [PMID: 30691293]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:194-206 [PMID: 26628334]
  6. Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Apr;120(2):604-22 [PMID: 25799030]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  8. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 28;21:100720 [PMID: 33553798]
  9. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;41(3-4):220-32 [PMID: 27160163]
  10. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158 [PMID: 11690728]
  11. Pain. 2008 Jan;134(1-2):158-73 [PMID: 17532138]
  12. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1146-1153 [PMID: 28586818]
  13. Behav Res Ther. 2018 Feb;101:3-11 [PMID: 29110885]
  14. Health Psychol. 2014 May;33(5):490-9 [PMID: 24447188]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):112-27 [PMID: 11811629]
  16. Front Neurol. 2020 May 19;11:247 [PMID: 32508729]
  17. J Pain. 2008 Oct;9(10):883-91 [PMID: 18602869]
  18. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Nov;7(6):593-601 [PMID: 22055976]
  19. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jun;50(6):413-7 [PMID: 22182852]
  20. Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Jun;20(3 Suppl 3):20-3 [PMID: 25001031]
  21. Can Fam Physician. 1999 Apr;45:992, 995, 1004-5 [PMID: 10216799]
  22. Psychosomatics. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):165-74 [PMID: 23352048]
  23. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2296-2303 [PMID: 32472486]
  24. Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8 [PMID: 14715035]
  25. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5 [PMID: 21584907]
  26. J Pain. 2020 Sep - Oct;21(9-10):931-942 [PMID: 31843583]
  27. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Apr;29(4):557-567 [PMID: 28088925]
  28. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23 [PMID: 21076562]
  29. J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):290-4 [PMID: 660402]
  30. Pain Med. 2007 May-Jun;8(4):359-75 [PMID: 17610459]
  31. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):197-207 [PMID: 24547805]
  32. Eur J Pain. 2007 Feb;11(2):153-63 [PMID: 16446108]
  33. Gerontologist. 2021 Apr 3;61(3):449-459 [PMID: 32601670]
  34. Aging Ment Health. 2022 May;26(5):980-991 [PMID: 33784902]
  35. J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Jan;36(1):29-55 [PMID: 26491029]
  36. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9 [PMID: 21035130]
  37. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):172-175 [PMID: 31765222]
  38. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 4;10(1):e25351 [PMID: 33208301]
  39. Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):1326-1337 [PMID: 33159516]
  40. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 8;4(6):e18703 [PMID: 32348281]
  41. J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(13-14):2129-2140 [PMID: 30010422]
  42. Psychother Res. 2008 Jul;18(4):481-94 [PMID: 18815999]
  43. Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83 [PMID: 21697139]
  44. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1144-1147 [PMID: 22321917]
  45. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 3;8(1):e13756 [PMID: 31899457]
  46. Pain Med. 2009 Nov;10(8):1395-407 [PMID: 20021599]

Grants

  1. R34 AT009356/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Brain
Chronic Pain
Cognitive Dysfunction
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Pain Measurement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AB-FremotefeasibilityChronicpainANDCPcognitiveCDadultsassociatedimprovementsHEPfunctiondeclineolderactivityphysicalemotionalin-personmethodologytrialPrograminterviewsOlder8n=StudyfullyanalysesmarkersParticipationimprovementcompletelyCognitiveBACKGROUNDOBJECTIVES:highlycomorbiddebilitatingamongiterativelydevelopedActiveBrains-Fitbitgroupmind-bodyprogramaidedFitbitfeasiblefunctioningdeliveredadaptedinterventiondeliverybypassbarriersparticipationreportrandomizedcontrolledvirtualversusHealthEnhancementeducationalcontrolfollowedqualitativeexitRESEARCHDESIGNMETHODS:aged≥602cohortscompletedweeks11proceduresvialivevideoQuantitativeexploredacceptabilitywithin-groupoutcomesQualitativeprimarilydeductiveusingFrameworkMethodRESULTS:metpriorisetbenchmarkssimilarpilotpreliminarysignalsmultimodalanxietyintensitycopingegself-efficacycatastrophizingsmallernegligibleExitconfirmedsatisfactioninterventionsDISCUSSIONIMPLICATIONS:ResultsprovideevidencestudyinitialresultswillinformpoweredefficacyCLINICALTRIALREGISTRATION:NCT04044183FeasibilityRandomizedControlledTrialMind-BodyActivityAdultsPainDecline:Virtual"ActiveBrains"illnessMind–bodyPhysical

Similar Articles

Cited By