Rural-urban differences in HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.

Lindsay R B Locklar, D Phuong Do
Author Information
  1. Lindsay R B Locklar: Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. ORCID
  2. D Phuong Do: Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rural preventable cancer disparities are often attributed in part to lower screening rates secondary to compromised health care access. When considering higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality, existing analyses primarily consider differences in Pap testing rather than the preferred method of HPV testing, which is more sensitive in identifying severe cases of cervical dysplasia.
METHODS: Logistic regression using data from the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System was used to examine urban and rural rates of cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Propensity score weighting was used to account for baseline sociodemographic differences between rural and urban populations in the 2016 landline sample.
FINDINGS: In 2016 and 2018, rural women were less likely than urban women to have current cervical cancer screening. This disparity was explained by sociodemographic variables in 2016. Among women with current cervical cancer screening, rural women were significantly less likely than urban women to undergo HPV testing in both 2016 and 2018.
CONCLUSION: Rural women with current cervical cancer screening were significantly less likely than their urban counterparts to have HPV testing. It is possible that updates to preventive care guidelines may be slower to reach rural providers, rural patients may be unaware that HPV testing was completed, or rural practice configuration may complicate the integration of HPV testing into clinical practice. Failure to undergo HPV testing may lead to delayed cervical dysplasia diagnosis, missed opportunities for early intervention, and contribute to rural/urban disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

Keywords

References

  1. Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, Srinivasan S, Croyle RT. Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(7):992-997.
  2. Henley SJ, Anderson RN, Thomas CC, Massetti GM, Peaker B, Richardson LC. Invasive cancer incidence, 2004-2013, and deaths, 2006-2015, in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties-United States. MMWR Surv Summ. 2017;66(14):1-13.
  3. Zahnd WE, James AS, Jenkins WD, et al. Rural-Urban Differences in Cancer Incidence and Trends in the United States. AACR; 2018.
  4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. Atlanta, GA; 2020.
  5. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12-19.
  6. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):147-172.
  7. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320(7):674-686.
  8. World Health Organization. Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem. 2020.
  9. Khoong EC, Gibbert WS, Garbutt JM, Sumner W, Brownson RC. Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines. J Rural Health. 2014;30(1):7-16.
  10. Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, et al. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;93:96-105.
  11. Doescher MP, Jackson JE. Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2009;15(3):200-209.
  12. Cole AM, Jackson JE, Doescher M. Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study. Cancer Med. 2012;1(3):350-356.
  13. Casey MM, Call KT, Klingner JM. Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services? Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(3):182-188.
  14. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2801-2812.
  15. Larson S, Correa-de-Araujo R. Preventive health examinations: a comparison along the rural-urban continuum. Women's Health Issues. 2006;16(2):80-88.
  16. Harper DM, Plegue M, Harmes KM, Jimbo M, SheinfeldGorin S. Three large scale surveys highlight the complexity of cervical cancer under-screening among women 45-65 years of age in the United States. Prev Med. 2020;130:105880.
  17. Zhang P, Tao G, Irwin KL. Utilization of preventive medical services in the United States: a comparison between rural and urban populations. J Rural Health. 2000;16(4):349-356.
  18. Howard M, Agarwal G, Lytwyn A. Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(1):1.
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016.
  20. Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. 2014.
  21. Lee S, Elkasabi M, Streja L. Increasing cell phone usage among Hispanics: implications for telephone surveys. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(6):e19-e24.
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm. 2019. Accessed October 9, 2019.
  23. Tangka FK, Howard DH, Royalty J, et al. Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997-2012. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(5):671-686.
  24. Teoh DG, Marriott AE, Vogel RI, et al. Adherence to the 2012 national cervical cancer screening guidelines: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1):62.e1-62.e9.
  25. Fontham ET, Wolf AM, Church TR, et al. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(5):321-346.
  26. Boone E, Lewis L, Karp M. Discontent and confusion: primary care providers' opinions and understanding of current cervical cancer screening recommendations. J Women's Health. 2016;25(3):255-262.
  27. Chen C-C, Chen L-W, Cheng S-H. Rural-urban differences in receiving guideline-recommended diabetes care and experiencing avoidable hospitalizations under a universal coverage health system: evidence from the past decade. Public Health. 2017;151:13-22.
  28. Zahnd WE, Askelson N, Vanderpool RC, et al. Challenges of using nationally representative, population-based surveys to assess rural cancer disparities. Prev Med. 2019;129:105812.
  29. Fontham ET, Wolf AM, Church TR, et al. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(5):321-346.
  30. Thompson EL, Galvin AM, Daley EM, Tatar O, Zimet GD, Rosberger Z. Recent changes in cervical cancer screening guidelines: US women's willingness for HPV testing instead of Pap testing. Prev Med. 2020;130:105928.
  31. Mohammed KA, Subramaniam DS, Geneus CJ, et al. Rural-urban differences in human papillomavirus knowledge and awareness among US adults. Prev Med. 2018;109:39-43.

MeSH Term

Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Papillomavirus Infections
Rural Population
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Vaginal Smears

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancercervicaltestingHPVruralscreeningwomen2016urbanmaydifferences2018lesslikelycurrentRuraldisparitiesratescareincidencemortalitydysplasiausedguidelinessociodemographicsignificantlyundergopracticePURPOSE:preventableoftenattributedpartlowersecondarycompromisedhealthaccessconsideringhigherexistinganalysesprimarilyconsiderPapratherpreferredmethodsensitiveidentifyingseverecasesMETHODS:LogisticregressionusingdataBehavioralRiskFactorSurveillanceSystemexamineaccordingnationalPropensityscoreweightingaccountbaselinepopulationslandlinesampleFINDINGS:disparityexplainedvariablesAmongCONCLUSION:counterpartspossibleupdatespreventiveslowerreachproviderspatientsunawarecompletedconfigurationcomplicateintegrationclinicalFailureleaddelayeddiagnosismissedopportunitiesearlyinterventioncontributerural/urbanRural-urban

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)