Modeling Climate Impacts on Tree Growth to Assess Tree Vulnerability to Drought During Forest Dieback.

Cristina Valeriano, Antonio Gazol, Michele Colangelo, Ester González de Andrés, J Julio Camarero
Author Information
  1. Cristina Valeriano: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.
  2. Antonio Gazol: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.
  3. Michele Colangelo: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.
  4. Ester González de Andrés: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.
  5. J Julio Camarero: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.

Abstract

Forest dieback because of drought is a global phenomenon threatening particular tree populations. Particularly vulnerable stands are usually located in climatically stressing locations such as xeric sites subjected to seasonal drought. These tree populations show a pronounced loss of vitality, growth decline, and high mortality in response to extreme climate events such as heat waves and droughts. However, dieback events do not uniformly affect stands, with some trees showing higher symptoms of drought vulnerability than other neighboring conspecifics. In this study, we investigated if trees showing different vulnerabilities to dieback showed lower growth rates (Grs) and higher sensitivities to the climate in the past using dendroecology and the Vaganov-Shashkin (VS) process-based growth model. We studied two stands with contrasting Grs showing recent dieback in the Iberian System, north-eastern Spain. We compared coexisting declining (D) and non-declining (ND) trees with crown defoliation values above and below the 50% threshold, respectively. The mean growth rate was lower in D than in ND trees in the two stands. The two vigor classes showed a growth divergence prior to the dieback onset and different responsiveness to climate. The ND trees were more responsive to changes in spring water balance and soil moisture than D trees, indicating a loss of growth responsiveness to the climate in stressed trees. Such an interaction between water availability and vigor was reflected by the VS-model simulations, which provided evidence for the observation that growth was mainly limited by low soil moisture in both sites. Such an interaction between water availability and vigor was reflected by the VS-model simulations, which provided evidence for the observation that growth was mainly limited by low soil moisture in both sites. The presented comparisons indicated different stand vulnerabilities to drought contingent on-site conditions. Further research should investigate the role played by environmental conditions and individual features such as access to soil water or hydraulic traits and implement them in process-based growth models to better forecast dieback.

Keywords

References

  1. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2143-2158 [PMID: 29488293]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 15;721:137599 [PMID: 32172101]
  3. Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Sep;35(9):1601-17 [PMID: 22462824]
  4. Science. 2015 Jul 31;349(6247):528-32 [PMID: 26228147]
  5. Tree Physiol. 2015 Aug;35(8):806-16 [PMID: 26048753]
  6. New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739 [PMID: 18422905]
  7. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):523-32 [PMID: 21802765]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 1;685:963-975 [PMID: 31247442]
  9. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jul;23(7):2705-2719 [PMID: 27782362]
  10. Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):531-539 [PMID: 29950621]
  11. Ecol Lett. 2020 May;23(5):891-901 [PMID: 32157766]
  12. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 08;9:1964 [PMID: 30713543]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 25;108(4):1474-8 [PMID: 21220333]
  14. New Phytol. 2013 Oct;200(2):298-300 [PMID: 24050631]
  15. Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 28;11(1):545 [PMID: 31992718]
  16. Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 06;9:1144 [PMID: 30127799]
  17. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Apr;23(4):1675-1690 [PMID: 27759919]
  18. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jun;22(6):2125-37 [PMID: 26790660]
  19. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jan 28;12:613643 [PMID: 33584770]
  20. Conserv Physiol. 2019 May 15;7(1):coz012 [PMID: 31198559]
  21. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1285-1291 [PMID: 29046541]
  22. Nature. 2012 Nov 29;491(7426):752-5 [PMID: 23172141]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0growthtreesdiebackclimatedroughtstandswatersoiltreesitesshowingdifferentprocess-basedtwoDNDvigormoistureForestpopulationslossdeclineeventshighervulnerabilitiesshowedlowerGrsdendroecologymodelresponsivenessinteractionavailabilityreflectedVS-modelsimulationsprovidedevidenceobservationmainlylimitedlowconditionsTreeglobalphenomenonthreateningparticularParticularlyvulnerableusuallylocatedclimaticallystressinglocationsxericsubjectedseasonalshowpronouncedvitalityhighmortalityresponseextremeheatwavesdroughtsHoweveruniformlyaffectsymptomsvulnerabilityneighboringconspecificsstudyinvestigatedratessensitivitiespastusingVaganov-ShashkinVSstudiedcontrastingrecentIberianSystemnorth-easternSpaincomparedcoexistingdecliningnon-decliningcrowndefoliationvalues50%thresholdrespectivelymeanrateclassesdivergenceprioronsetresponsivechangesspringbalanceindicatingstressedpresentedcomparisonsindicatedstandcontingenton-siteresearchinvestigateroleplayedenvironmentalindividualfeaturesaccesshydraulictraitsimplementmodelsbetterforecastModelingClimateImpactsGrowthAssessVulnerabilityDroughtDiebackPinuspinasterwarmingdie-offrings

Similar Articles

Cited By