The expanded interactional model of exercise addiction.

Jacob S Dinardi, Alexei Y Egorov, Attila Szabo
Author Information
  1. Jacob S Dinardi: 1 Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA. ORCID
  2. Alexei Y Egorov: 2 Department of Psychiatry and Addictions, Faculty of Medicine, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. ORCID
  3. Attila Szabo: 4 Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cited in over 100 articles, the interactional model of exercise addiction (Egorov & Szabo, 2013) forms the theoretical foundation of many studies on the risk of exercise addiction. Still, the inclusion of previously omitted determinants could make it more useful. Therefore, this review presents the expanded version of the original model.
METHOD: We added 'self-concept' as another determinant in the 'personal factors' domain and 'attractive alternatives' to the 'situational factors' domain. Further, we doubled the reasons for exercise in the 'incentives for exercise domain.' Last, we added a new domain, the 'exercise-related stressors,' to illustrate that exercise itself might be a source of stress.
RESULTS: The expanded model is more inclusive and accounts for a greater combination of interactions playing roles in exercise addiction. Overlooking the eventuality that stress resulting from exercise might also fuel the dysfunction was a significant omission from the original model, rectified in the current update. Finally, the new expansions make the model more applicable to competitive situations too.
CONCLUSION: The expanded interactional model of exercise addiction is more comprehensive than its original version. It also accounts for the exercise or sport-related stress as possible fuel in addictive exercise behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):221-228 [PMID: 28494647]
  2. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;215(2):410-6 [PMID: 24342179]
  3. J Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;11(6):887-903 [PMID: 17035261]
  4. Ment Health Phys Act. 2016 Mar;10:68-72 [PMID: 27453730]
  5. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):587-95 [PMID: 22677079]
  6. Br J Addict. 1990 Nov;85(11):1403-8 [PMID: 2285834]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Oct;8(10):4069-81 [PMID: 22073029]
  8. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Apr;30(4):787-800 [PMID: 31858648]
  9. J Behav Addict. 2013 Dec;2(4):199-208 [PMID: 25215201]
  10. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Jun;83(2):318-29 [PMID: 22808718]
  11. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 27;8:205-212 [PMID: 29138604]
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462 [PMID: 33239350]
  13. J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):325-31 [PMID: 27363466]
  14. Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 17;9:1484 [PMID: 30174636]
  15. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0213060 [PMID: 30943200]

MeSH Term

Behavior, Addictive
Exercise
Humans
Motivation
Sports

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exercisemodeladdictionexpandeddomaininteractionaloriginalstressmakeversionaddedfactors''newmightaccountsalsofuelBACKGROUNDANDAIMS:Cited100articlesEgorov&Szabo2013formstheoreticalfoundationmanystudiesriskStillinclusionpreviouslyomitteddeterminantsusefulThereforereviewpresentsMETHOD:'self-concept'anotherdeterminant'personal'attractivealternatives''situationaldoubledreasons'incentivesLast'exercise-relatedstressorsillustratesourceRESULTS:inclusivegreatercombinationinteractionsplayingrolesOverlookingeventualityresultingdysfunctionsignificantomissionrectifiedcurrentupdateFinallyexpansionsapplicablecompetitivesituationstooCONCLUSION:comprehensivesport-relatedpossibleaddictivebehaviorcompulsiondependencephysicalactivitytraining

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)