Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative study.

Laura Yeates, Kristie McDonald, Charlotte Burns, Christopher Semsarian, Stacy Carter, Jodie Ingles
Author Information
  1. Laura Yeates: Cardio Genomics Program at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  2. Kristie McDonald: Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  3. Charlotte Burns: Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  4. Christopher Semsarian: Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  5. Stacy Carter: Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  6. Jodie Ingles: Cardio Genomics Program at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jodie.ingles@populationgenomics.org.au. ORCID

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) ensures a disease-causing variant is not passed to the next generation, including for inherited heart diseases. PGD is known to cause significant emotional burden, but little is known about how parents experience PGD to select against inherited heart disease. We aim to understand how people with inherited heart disease, and their partners, experience and make decisions about PGD. Participants were recruited from a specialised inherited heart disease clinic. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult participants who had considered PGD. A semi-structured interview schedule explored overall experiences and reasons for undergoing PGD. Broad topics included experience of disease, reproductive history, psychosocial and financial considerations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using a framework method. Twenty participants were included (15 with inherited cardiomyopathy, 3 with inherited arrhythmia syndrome and 2 partners). In contemplating PGD, participants considered 3 main issues: past experience of disease e.g. sudden cardiac death, sport restrictions and clinical heterogeneity; intergenerational responsibilities; and practical considerations such as finances and maternal age. Among those who chose to undergo PGD (n = 7/18), past experience of a significant cardiac event, such as family history of sudden cardiac death, was important in the decision process. The decision to undergo PGD for inherited heart disease is complex and influenced by individual values and experience of disease. We highlight key areas where further discussion may assist in PGD decision processes.

References

  1. Karatas JC, Barlow-Stewart K, Meiser B, McMahon C, Strong KA, Hill W, et al. A prospective study assessing anxiety, depression and maternal-fetal attachment in women using PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:148–56. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq281]
  2. Vermeesch JR, Voet T, Devriendt K. Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:643–56. [DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.97]
  3. Karatas JC, Strong KA, Barlow-Stewart K, McMahon C, Meiser B, Roberts C. Psychological impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a review of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:83–91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.005]
  4. Katz MG, Fitzgerald L, Bankier A, Savulescu J, Cram DS. Issues and concerns of couples presenting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:1117–22. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.498]
  5. Lavery SA, Aurell R, Turner C, Castello C, Veiga A, Barri PN, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients’ experiences and attitudes. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2464–7. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2464]
  6. Genoff Garzon MC, Rubin LR, Lobel M, Stelling J, Pastore LM. Review of patient decision-making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Clin Genet. 2018;94:22–42. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174]
  7. Hershberger PE, Pierce PF. Conceptualizing couples’ decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:53–62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.017]
  8. Karatas JC, Barlow-Stewart K, Strong KA, Meiser B, McMahon C, Roberts C. Women’s experience of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a qualitative study. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:771–7. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.2542]
  9. Ingles J, Yeates L, O’Brien L, McGaughran J, Scuffham PA, Atherton J, et al. Genetic testing for inherited heart diseases: longitudinal impact on health-related quality of life. Genet Med. 2012;14:749–52. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.47]
  10. Yeates L, Hunt L, Saleh M, Semsarian C, Ingles J. Poor psychological wellbeing particularly in mothers following sudden cardiac death in the young. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;12:484–91. [DOI: 10.1177/1474515113485510]
  11. Ingles J, Yeates L, Semsarian C. The emerging role of the cardiac genetic counselor. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1958–62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.017]
  12. Bagnall RD, Weintraub RG, Ingles J, Duflou J, Yeates L, Lam L, et al. A prospective study of sudden cardiac death among children and young adults. N. Engl J Med. 2016;374:2441–52. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510687]
  13. Ingles J, Spinks C, Yeates L, McGeechan K, Kasparian N, Semsarian C. Posttraumatic stress and prolonged grief after the sudden cardiac death of a young relative. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:402–5. [DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7808]
  14. Simpson JL, Kuliev A, Rechitsky S. Overview of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): historical perspective and future direction. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1885:23–43. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_2]
  15. Hershberger PE, Gallo AM, Kavanaugh K, Olshansky E, Schwartz A, Tur-Kaspa I. The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1536–43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.003]
  16. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117]

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Genetic Testing
Heart Diseases
Humans
Parents
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis
Qualitative Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PGDinheriteddiseaseheartexperienceparticipantscardiacdecisiongeneticdiagnosisknownsignificantpartnerssemi-structuredconsideredexperiencesincludedhistoryconsiderations3pastsuddendeathundergoPreimplantationensuresdisease-causingvariantpassednextgenerationincludingdiseasescauseemotionalburdenlittleparentsselectaimunderstandpeoplemakedecisionsParticipantsrecruitedspecialisedclinicQualitativeinterviewsconductedadultinterviewscheduleexploredoverallreasonsundergoingBroadtopicsreproductivepsychosocialfinancialInterviewsrecordedtranscribedverbatimthematicallyanalysedusingframeworkmethodTwenty15cardiomyopathyarrhythmiasyndrome2contemplatingmainissues:egsportrestrictionsclinicalheterogeneityintergenerationalresponsibilitiespracticalfinancesmaternalageAmongchosen = 7/18eventfamilyimportantprocesscomplexinfluencedindividualvalueshighlightkeyareasdiscussionmayassistprocessesDecision-makingpreimplantationdiseases:qualitativestudy

Similar Articles

Cited By