Functional network connectivity during Jazz improvisation.

Victor M Vergara, Martin Norgaard, Robyn Miller, Roger E Beaty, Kiran Dhakal, Mukesh Dhamala, Vince D Calhoun
Author Information
  1. Victor M Vergara: Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. vvergara@gsu.edu.
  2. Martin Norgaard: School of Music, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  3. Robyn Miller: Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
  4. Roger E Beaty: Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  5. Kiran Dhakal: Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA.
  6. Mukesh Dhamala: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  7. Vince D Calhoun: Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.

Abstract

One of the most complex forms of creativity is musical improvisation where new music is produced in real time. Brain behavior during music production has several dimensions depending on the conditions of the performance. The expression of creativity is suspected to be different whether novel ideas must be externalized using a musical instrument or can be imagined internally. This study explores whole brain functional network connectivity from fMRI data during jazz music improvisation compared against a baseline of prelearned score performance. Given that creativity might be affected by external execution, another dimension where musicians imagine or vocalize the music was also tested. We found improvisation was associated with a state of weak connectivity necessary for attenuated executive control network recruitment associated with a feeling of "flow" allowing unhindered musical creation. In addition, elicited connectivity for sensorimotor and executive control networks is not different whether musicians imagine or externalize (through vocalization) musical performance.

References

  1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Apr;51:108-17 [PMID: 25601088]
  2. Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2 [PMID: 9623998]
  3. Emotion. 2010 Jun;10(3):301-11 [PMID: 20515220]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82 [PMID: 16723398]
  5. Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 1;62(4):2281-95 [PMID: 22326834]
  6. Brain Connect. 2019 Apr;9(3):296-309 [PMID: 30618291]
  7. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 22;13:169 [PMID: 31191276]
  8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(7):977-86 [PMID: 17445893]
  9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Feb;20(2):87-95 [PMID: 26553223]
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 2):066133 [PMID: 15244693]
  11. Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1214-22 [PMID: 15219593]
  12. Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2078 [PMID: 28119660]
  13. Sci Rep. 2012;2:834 [PMID: 23155479]
  14. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:426-44 [PMID: 23643999]
  15. J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 30;34(18):6156-63 [PMID: 24790186]
  16. Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):535-43 [PMID: 18420426]
  17. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15 [PMID: 11994752]
  18. J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56 [PMID: 17329432]
  19. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1011-26 [PMID: 15875970]
  20. Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116384 [PMID: 31760149]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 16;10:579 [PMID: 27899889]
  22. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Feb 04;5:2 [PMID: 21442040]
  23. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98 [PMID: 19190637]
  24. Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 07;2:156 [PMID: 21779271]
  25. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2625-39 [PMID: 19276327]
  26. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Mar 25;: [PMID: 29577331]
  27. PLoS One. 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e0002051 [PMID: 18446219]
  28. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9(7):1006-12 [PMID: 23696692]
  29. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:320-41 [PMID: 23994314]
  30. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:433-47 [PMID: 25938726]
  31. Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69 [PMID: 19819337]
  32. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jul;26(7):3052-63 [PMID: 26088973]
  33. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316:29-52 [PMID: 24502540]
  34. J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2605-2614 [PMID: 29437891]
  35. J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 11;38(15):3767-3775 [PMID: 29555854]
  36. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;27:22-30 [PMID: 30906824]
  37. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Dec;9(12):1942-51 [PMID: 24493844]
  38. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  39. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):158-65 [PMID: 21616982]
  40. PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1679 [PMID: 18301756]
  41. Brain Connect. 2016 Dec;6(10):772-785 [PMID: 27750434]
  42. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 28;35(43):14426-34 [PMID: 26511235]
  43. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e88665 [PMID: 24586366]
  44. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):12-32 [PMID: 23869106]
  45. Neuroimage. 1995 Mar;2(1):45-53 [PMID: 9343589]

Grants

  1. R01 MH123610/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Brain
Executive Function
Humans
Imagination
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Music
Psychomotor Performance
Singing
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0musicalimprovisationmusicconnectivitycreativityperformancenetworkdifferentwhethermusiciansimagineassociatedexecutivecontrolOnecomplexformsnewproducedrealtimeBrainbehaviorproductionseveraldimensionsdependingconditionsexpressionsuspectednovelideasmustexternalizedusinginstrumentcanimaginedinternallystudyexploreswholebrainfunctionalfMRIdatajazzcomparedbaselineprelearnedscoreGivenmightaffectedexternalexecutionanotherdimensionvocalizealsotestedfoundstateweaknecessaryattenuatedrecruitmentfeeling"flow"allowingunhinderedcreationadditionelicitedsensorimotornetworksexternalizevocalizationFunctionalJazz

Similar Articles

Cited By