Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection.

Steev Loyola, Alfredo Huaman, Dina Popuche, Elizabeth Castillo, Julia S Ampuero, Maria Silva, Carolina Guevara, Douglas M Watts
Author Information
  1. Steev Loyola: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru. ORCID
  2. Alfredo Huaman: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru.
  3. Dina Popuche: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru.
  4. Elizabeth Castillo: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru.
  5. Julia S Ampuero: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru. ORCID
  6. Maria Silva: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru.
  7. Carolina Guevara: U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima 07006, Peru.
  8. Douglas M Watts: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to diagnose ZIKV infection. Acute and convalescent paired serum samples from 51 patients who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of an arbovirus illness in dengue-endemic areas of Honduras, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru were used in the assessment. Samples were tested for ZIKV, dengue and chikungunya virus using a variety of laboratory techniques. The results for the ZIKV-RNA screening and seroconversion detected by the microneutralization test were used to construct a composite reference standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the MAC-ELISA were 93.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Contrastingly, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the PRNT were 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Restricting the analysis according to IgM or neutralizing antibodies against dengue, the performances of both serological assays were adequate. The findings of this study reveal that the MAC-ELISA and PRNT would provide initial reliable laboratory diagnostic assays for ZIKV infection in dengue-endemic areas.

Keywords

References

  1. J Virol Methods. 2019 Jan;263:68-74 [PMID: 30342068]
  2. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec;99(6):1440-1450 [PMID: 30298808]
  3. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223832 [PMID: 31603953]
  4. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Dec;69(6 Suppl):5-11 [PMID: 14740949]
  5. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 1;171(3):288-295 [PMID: 27812690]
  6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1093-104 [PMID: 23958378]
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;21(12):2274-6 [PMID: 26584464]
  8. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 May 04;4(5):e670 [PMID: 20454609]
  9. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;3(4):561-569 [PMID: 30886369]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 30;114(22):E4334-E4343 [PMID: 28442561]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Oct;51(10):3418-20 [PMID: 23903549]
  12. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3): [PMID: 29305550]
  13. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;25(2):299-303 [PMID: 30666931]
  14. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017 May 10;6(5):e33 [PMID: 28487557]
  15. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0200576 [PMID: 30024910]
  16. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):860-7 [PMID: 26888897]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1837-1841 [PMID: 29742377]
  18. J Med Virol. 2017 Aug;89(8):1477-1479 [PMID: 28229481]
  19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966 Mar;15(2):219-26 [PMID: 5910528]
  20. Stat Med. 2016 Apr 30;35(9):1454-70 [PMID: 26555849]
  21. Nature. 2017 Jun 15;546(7658):411-415 [PMID: 28538734]
  22. Viruses. 2020 Oct 31;12(11): [PMID: 33142747]
  23. J Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;189(6):990-1000 [PMID: 14999601]
  24. Acta Trop. 2020 Jan;201:105201 [PMID: 31562846]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7852-7 [PMID: 27354515]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1444-1457 [PMID: 31597021]
  27. BMC Med. 2018 May 15;16(1):67 [PMID: 29759069]
  28. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2172-81 [PMID: 23637298]
  29. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Jul;29(3):487-524 [PMID: 27029595]
  30. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Jan;141(1):60-67 [PMID: 27763787]
  31. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2127-2136 [PMID: 28446573]
  32. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;21(10):1885-6 [PMID: 26401719]
  33. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 2;11(2):e0005269 [PMID: 28151953]
  34. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jan 19;8:2677 [PMID: 29403448]
  35. Cell Host Microbe. 2016 May 11;19(5):696-704 [PMID: 27158114]
  36. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Aug 10;4(8):e787 [PMID: 20706628]

Grants

  1. 800000.82000.25GB.B0016/Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division
  2. P0106_18_N6_01.01/Global Emerging Infections Surveillance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ZIKVZikavirusinfectiondengue-endemicareasMAC-ELISAPRNTdiagnoseusingserologicalIgMenzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassayneutralizationtestuseddenguelaboratoryoverallsensitivityspecificity0%respectivelyassaysemergedspreadrapidlySouthAmericancountries2015Effortstoolschallengingantigenicsimilaritiesvirusesassessedperformancein-housedevelopedantibodycaptureplaquereductionAcuteconvalescentpairedserumsamples51patientspresentedclinicalsymptomssuggestivearbovirusillnessHondurasVenezuelaColombiaPeruassessmentSamplestestedchikungunyavarietytechniquesresultsZIKV-RNAscreeningseroconversiondetectedmicroneutralizationconstructcompositereferencestandard935%100Contrastingly968%95RestrictinganalysisaccordingneutralizingantibodiesperformancesadequatefindingsstudyrevealprovideinitialreliablediagnosticEvaluationTwoSerologicalAssaysDiagnosingVirusInfectiontests

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)