Manufacturing Bacteriophages (Part 2 of 2): Formulation, Analytics and Quality Control Considerations.

Carolina Moraes de Souza, Tayfun Tanir, Marvin Orellana, Aster Escalante, Michael Sandor Koeris
Author Information
  1. Carolina Moraes de Souza: Amgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
  2. Tayfun Tanir: Amgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
  3. Marvin Orellana: Amgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
  4. Aster Escalante: Amgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
  5. Michael Sandor Koeris: Amgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.

Abstract

Within this second piece of the two-part series of phage manufacturing considerations, we are examining the creation of a drug product from a drug substance in the form of formulation, through to fill-finish. Formulation of a drug product, in the case of bacteriophage products, is often considered only after many choices have been made in the development and manufacture of a drug substance, increasing the final product development timeline and difficulty of achieving necessary performance parameters. As with the preceding review in this sequence, we aim to provide the reader with a framework to be able to consider pharmaceutical development choices for the formulation of a bacteriophage-based drug product. The intent is to sensitize and highlight the tradeoffs that are necessary in the development of a finished drug product, and to be able to take the entire spectrum of tradeoffs into account, starting with early-stage R&D efforts. Furthermore, we are arming the reader with an overview of historical and current analytical methods with a special emphasis on most relevant and most widely available methods. Bacteriophages pose some challenges that are related to but also separate from eukaryotic viruses. Last, but not least, we close this two-part series by briefly discussing quality control (QC) aspects of a bacteriophage-based product, taking into consideration the opportunities and challenges that engineered bacteriophages uniquely present and offer.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205728 [PMID: 30308048]
  2. Food Microbiol. 2007 Feb;24(1):75-81 [PMID: 16943097]
  3. BMC Microbiol. 2009 Jul 23;9:148 [PMID: 19627589]
  4. J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Dec;117(6):1810-9 [PMID: 25250638]
  5. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011 May;56(3):191-200 [PMID: 21625877]
  6. Annu Rev Virol. 2015 Nov;2(1):599-618 [PMID: 26958930]
  7. Pharm Res. 2015 Jul;32(7):2173-9 [PMID: 25585954]
  8. Water Res. 2017 Nov 1;124:465-471 [PMID: 28800517]
  9. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Sep 14;11(9): [PMID: 31540028]
  10. Bacteriophage. 2012 Apr 1;2(2):98-104 [PMID: 23050220]
  11. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Jun 11;10(7):472-82 [PMID: 22683880]
  12. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Oct;85(2):161 [PMID: 23820293]
  13. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017 Nov;249:100-133 [PMID: 28688779]
  14. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 19;12(9): [PMID: 32961738]
  15. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Jan 15;127:300-318 [PMID: 30428336]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3188-92 [PMID: 8622911]
  17. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Apr;50(4):1268-75 [PMID: 16569839]
  18. Viruses. 2021 Feb 20;13(2): [PMID: 33672780]
  19. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183510 [PMID: 28817689]
  20. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1693:271-283 [PMID: 29119446]
  21. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0151184 [PMID: 26964063]
  22. Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 12;9:2172 [PMID: 30258426]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 23;11:594868 [PMID: 33193274]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jul;78(13):4646-53 [PMID: 22522686]
  25. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1693:219-230 [PMID: 29119443]
  26. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0122672 [PMID: 25811193]
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Jul;81(14):4841-9 [PMID: 25956778]
  28. Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 08;10:2289 [PMID: 31649636]
  29. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011 Mar;12(1):62-76 [PMID: 21174180]
  30. Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 04;11:1161 [PMID: 32582101]
  31. Cell. 2019 Oct 3;179(2):459-469.e9 [PMID: 31585083]
  32. AMB Express. 2019 Jun 17;9(1):87 [PMID: 31209685]
  33. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1626-35 [PMID: 11980932]
  34. Int J Pharm. 2011 Sep 15;416(1):280-7 [PMID: 21771648]
  35. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13893 [PMID: 31554892]
  36. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011 Mar;12(1):372-8 [PMID: 21347620]
  37. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Jun 12;10:3955-71 [PMID: 26109855]
  38. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2178 [PMID: 29391566]
  39. Langmuir. 2011 May 3;27(9):5472-80 [PMID: 21452812]
  40. Int J Pharm. 2019 May 1;562:271-292 [PMID: 30910632]
  41. J Pharm Sci. 2010 Oct;99(10):4363-79 [PMID: 20737639]
  42. Cytometry. 1991;12(2):167-71 [PMID: 1710960]
  43. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Aug;84(3):578-82 [PMID: 23353012]
  44. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 May 02;14(5): [PMID: 34063218]
  45. Int J Pharm. 2010 Apr 15;389(1-2):168-75 [PMID: 20105458]
  46. Pharm Res. 2016 Jun;33(6):1486-96 [PMID: 26928668]
  47. Bioimpacts. 2015;5(1):55-63 [PMID: 25901297]
  48. Bioeng Transl Med. 2020 Apr 14;5(2):e10159 [PMID: 32440564]
  49. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug;109(2):388-397 [PMID: 20102425]
  50. Med Res Rev. 2020 Jan;40(1):459-463 [PMID: 31062882]
  51. J Pharm Sci. 2011 Dec;100(12):5197-205 [PMID: 22020816]
  52. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018 Feb 26;11(1): [PMID: 29495355]
  53. Biomaterials. 2010 Mar;31(7):1904-10 [PMID: 19945158]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0drugproductdevelopmentsubstanceformulationtwo-partseriesphagemanufacturingfill-finishFormulationbacteriophagechoicesnecessaryreaderablebacteriophage-basedtradeoffsanalyticalmethodsBacteriophageschallenges2Withinsecondpiececonsiderationsexaminingcreationformcaseproductsoftenconsideredmanymademanufactureincreasingfinaltimelinedifficultyachievingperformanceparametersprecedingreviewsequenceaimprovideframeworkconsiderpharmaceuticalintentsensitizehighlightfinishedtakeentirespectrumaccountstartingearly-stageR&DeffortsFurthermorearmingoverviewhistoricalcurrentspecialemphasisrelevantwidelyavailableposerelatedalsoseparateeukaryoticvirusesLastleastclosebrieflydiscussingqualitycontrolQCaspectstakingconsiderationopportunitiesengineeredbacteriophagesuniquelypresentofferManufacturingPart:AnalyticsQualityControlConsiderationstherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By