Financing constraints and firm-level responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence.

Safi Ullah Khan
Author Information
  1. Safi Ullah Khan: UTB School of Business, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Brunei Darussalam.

Abstract

We explore whether financing constraints affected the ways in which small and medium-sized enterprises navigated through the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We draw on data from a novel source, the conducted in 19 countries by the World Bank Enterprise Analysis Unit as a follow-up to enterprise surveys conducted in these countries prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. We find that previous bank-lending credit constraints magnified the effects of the pandemic. More specifically, credit-rationed firms were more likely to experience greater liquidity and cash flow problems and more likely than unconstrained firms to be delinquent in meeting their obligations to financial institutions during the economic crisis. Furthermore, these firms were less likely to have access to bank funding as a principal source of financing to address pandemic-induced cash flow and liquidity problems during the COVID-19 outbreak. We further find that credit-constrained firms were more likely to use trade credit, delay payments to suppliers or employees, and rely on government grants to cope with pandemic-related liquidity and cash flow problems. We find little evidence that credit-rationed firms were more likely to raise equity capital during this economic crisis. Finally, we find that financing constraints were more likely to hamper firms' ability to adjust business operations in response to exogenous shocks. This study contributes to the literature on the impact of credit constraints on firm behavior in times of crisis.

Keywords

References

  1. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101604 [PMID: 32837363]
  2. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Jun 15;60:102317 [PMID: 36570630]
  3. Int Small Bus J. 2020 Aug;38(5):380-390 [PMID: 38602995]
  4. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Mar;45:102124 [PMID: 35221808]
  5. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Mar;45:102157 [PMID: 35221816]
  6. Q Rev Econ Finance. 2023 Feb;87:181-190 [PMID: 32982131]
  7. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100341 [PMID: 32427215]
  8. Energy Econ. 2021 Sep;101:105431 [PMID: 34876761]
  9. J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106121 [PMID: 35185267]
  10. World Dev. 2021 Jul;143:105473 [PMID: 36567900]
  11. Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):110-20 [PMID: 18436332]
  12. J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Oct;91(4):572-9 [PMID: 11576290]
  13. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101669 [PMID: 32837374]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(12):3113-23 [PMID: 16978751]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0constraintslikelyCOVID-19firmsfindcreditfinancingeconomicpandemicliquiditycashflowproblemscrisissourceconductedcountriesBankoutbreakcredit-rationedevidenceexplorewhetheraffectedwayssmallmedium-sizedenterprisesnavigateddisruptionscauseddrawdatanovel19WorldEnterpriseAnalysisUnitfollow-upenterprisesurveyspriorpreviousbank-lendingmagnifiedeffectsspecificallyexperiencegreaterunconstraineddelinquentmeetingobligationsfinancialinstitutionsFurthermorelessaccessbankfundingprincipaladdresspandemic-inducedcredit-constrainedusetradedelaypaymentssuppliersemployeesrelygovernmentgrantscopepandemic-relatedlittleraiseequitycapitalFinallyhamperfirms'abilityadjustbusinessoperationsresponseexogenousshocksstudycontributesliteratureimpactfirmbehaviortimesFinancingfirm-levelresponsespandemic:InternationalrationingBusinessadjustmentsFinancialLiquidity

Similar Articles

Cited By