Demographic risk assessment for a harvested species threatened by climate change: polar bears in the Chukchi Sea.

Eric V Regehr, Michael C Runge, Andrew Von Duyke, Ryan R Wilson, Lori Polasek, Karyn D Rode, Nathan J Hostetter, Sarah J Converse
Author Information
  1. Eric V Regehr: Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA. ORCID
  2. Michael C Runge: Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Laurel, Maryland, 20708, USA.
  3. Andrew Von Duyke: Department of Wildlife Management, North Slope Borough, Utqiaġvik, Alaska, 99723, USA.
  4. Ryan R Wilson: Marine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, 99503, USA. ORCID
  5. Lori Polasek: Division of Wildlife Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, Alaska, 99802, USA.
  6. Karyn D Rode: Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
  7. Nathan J Hostetter: Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA. ORCID
  8. Sarah J Converse: Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences (SEFS) & School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (SAFS), U.S. Geological Survey, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA.

Abstract

Climate change threatens global biodiversity. Many species vulnerable to climate change are important to humans for nutritional, cultural, and economic reasons. Polar bears Ursus maritimus are threatened by sea-ice loss and represent a subsistence resource for Indigenous people. We applied a novel population modeling-management framework that is based on species life history and accounts for habitat loss to evaluate subsistence harvest for the Chukchi Sea (CS) polar bear subpopulation. Harvest strategies followed a state-dependent approach under which new data were used to update the harvest on a predetermined management interval. We found that a harvest strategy with a starting total harvest rate of 2.7% (˜85 bears/yr at current abundance), a 2:1 male-to-female ratio, and a 10-yr management interval would likely maintain subpopulation abundance above maximum net productivity level for the next 35 yr (approximately three polar bear generations), our primary criterion for sustainability. Plausible bounds on starting total harvest rate were 1.7-3.9%, where the range reflects uncertainty due to sampling variation, environmental variation, model selection, and differing levels of risk tolerance. The risk of undesired demographic outcomes (e.g., overharvest) was positively related to harvest rate, management interval, and projected declines in environmental carrying capacity; and negatively related to precision in population data. Results reflect several lines of evidence that the CS subpopulation has been productive in recent years, although it is uncertain how long this will last as sea-ice loss continues. Our methods provide a template for balancing trade-offs among protection, use, research investment, and other factors. Demographic risk assessment and state-dependent management will become increasingly important for harvested species, like polar bears, that exhibit spatiotemporal variation in their response to climate change.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Ecol. 2017 Oct;54(5):1534-1543 [PMID: 29081540]
  2. Ecol Appl. 2008 Mar;18(2 Suppl):S97-125 [PMID: 18494365]
  3. Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jun;27(12):2684-2701 [PMID: 33644944]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836): [PMID: 27534959]
  5. Biol Lett. 2016 Dec;12(12): [PMID: 27928000]
  6. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2016 Sep-Oct;89(5):377-88 [PMID: 27617359]
  7. Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):295-8 [PMID: 26185248]
  8. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 14;8(1):16780 [PMID: 30429493]
  9. Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):724-37 [PMID: 25783745]
  10. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):410-423 [PMID: 28994242]
  11. Ecol Appl. 2016 Jul;26(5):1302-1320 [PMID: 27755745]
  12. PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0251130 [PMID: 33956835]
  13. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):76-88 [PMID: 23913506]
  14. Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 04;5(12):eaaw9883 [PMID: 31840060]
  15. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142213 [PMID: 26580809]
  16. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e85410 [PMID: 24427306]
  17. Ecol Lett. 2012 Apr;15(4):365-377 [PMID: 22257223]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 22;275(1631):217-26 [PMID: 18029307]
  19. Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02461 [PMID: 34582601]

MeSH Term

Animals
Arctic Regions
Climate Change
Demography
Female
Ice Cover
Male
Risk Assessment
Ursidae

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0harvestpolarmanagementriskchangespeciesclimatelossbearssubsistencebearsubpopulationstate-dependentintervalratevariationassessmentimportantUrsusmaritimusthreatenedsea-icepopulationhabitatChukchiSeaCSdatastartingtotalabundancesustainabilityenvironmentalrelatedwillDemographicharvestedClimatethreatensglobalbiodiversityManyvulnerablehumansnutritionalculturaleconomicreasonsPolarrepresentresourceIndigenouspeopleappliednovelmodeling-managementframeworkbasedlifehistoryaccountsevaluateHarveststrategiesfollowedapproachnewusedupdatepredeterminedfoundstrategy27%˜85bears/yrcurrent2:1male-to-femaleratio10-yrlikelymaintainmaximumnetproductivitylevelnext35 yrapproximatelythreegenerationsprimarycriterionPlausiblebounds17-39%rangereflectsuncertaintyduesamplingmodelselectiondifferinglevelstoleranceundesireddemographicoutcomesegoverharvestpositivelyprojecteddeclinescarryingcapacitynegativelyprecisionResultsreflectseverallinesevidenceproductiverecentyearsalthoughuncertainlonglastcontinuesmethodsprovidetemplatebalancingtrade-offsamongprotectionuseresearchinvestmentfactorsbecomeincreasinglylikeexhibitspatiotemporalresponsechange:densitydependence

Similar Articles

Cited By