For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.

David B Resnik, Edith Lee, Bill Jirles, Elise Smith, Kathy Barker
Author Information
  1. David B Resnik: Bioethicist, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  2. Edith Lee: Office of Fellows' Career Development, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  3. Bill Jirles: Program Analyst, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  4. Elise Smith: Assistant Professor of Preventative Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. ORCID
  5. Kathy Barker: Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Abstract

To obtain some exploratory, qualitative data on ethical issues and values in managing a research laboratory, we conducted three focus groups with experienced investigators and laboratory managers. After validating the focus group transcripts for accuracy, two coders used deductive and inductive coding to develop themes from the text. Participants regarded ethics as important in managing a laboratory (or research group) for various reasons, ranging from conducting research with integrity to exhibiting leadership and promoting an ethical research climate. Participants identified many different types of ethical issues that arise in managing a research laboratory, including issues involving the management people, financial and material resources, projects, and data. An overarching ethical dilemma identified by participants was balancing the desire for productivity against apparently competing values, such as treating people fairly and promoting the wellbeing of individuals. Participants also indicated that graduate and post-graduate education and training did not prepare them to deal with the ethical, financial, interpersonal, and other issues related to managing a research laboratory, and that communication and leadership are crucial to managing a research laboratory ethically.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 [PMID: 18352969]
  2. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):67-83 [PMID: 20831422]
  3. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3017-3036 [PMID: 32779115]
  4. Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):246-251 [PMID: 30793632]
  5. Account Res. 2022 Jan;29(1):2-17 [PMID: 33517782]
  6. Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;6(3):257-270 [PMID: 34660847]
  7. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0214595 [PMID: 31017929]
  8. Dev World Bioeth. 2001 May;1(1):11-32 [PMID: 12870505]
  9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):247-61 [PMID: 21327723]
  10. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):408-423 [PMID: 27646401]
  11. Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):550-555 [PMID: 29068823]
  12. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):813-34 [PMID: 23096775]
  13. Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72 [PMID: 17286625]
  14. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:361-88 [PMID: 22856467]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR001439/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. Z99 ES999999/Intramural NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Focus Groups
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchlaboratorymanagingethicalissuesfocusgroupParticipantsleadershipdatavaluesthreegroupsethicsintegritypromotingclimateidentifiedmanagementpeoplefinancialproductivityobtainexploratoryqualitativeconductedexperiencedinvestigatorsmanagersvalidatingtranscriptsaccuracytwocodersuseddeductiveinductivecodingdevelopthemestextregardedimportantvariousreasonsrangingconductingexhibitingmanydifferenttypesariseincludinginvolvingmaterialresourcesprojectsoverarchingdilemmaparticipantsbalancingdesireapparentlycompetingtreatingfairlywellbeingindividualsalsoindicatedgraduatepost-graduateeducationtrainingpreparedealinterpersonalrelatedcommunicationcrucialethically"goodlab":InsightsconcerningEthicsfairnessstewardship

Similar Articles

Cited By