Marking through molts: An evaluation of visible implant elastomer to permanently mark individuals in a lower termite species.

Rebecca F B Padget, Faye J Thompson
Author Information
  1. Rebecca F B Padget: Centre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Cornwall UK. ORCID
  2. Faye J Thompson: Centre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Cornwall UK. ORCID

Abstract

Advances in individual marking methods have facilitated detailed studies of animal populations and behavior as they allow tracking of individuals through time and space. Hemimetabolous insects, representing a wide range of commonly used model organisms, present a unique challenge to individual marking as they are not only generally small-bodied, but also molt throughout development, meaning that traditional surface marks are not persistent.Visible implant elastomer (VIE) offers a potential solution as small amounts of the inert polymer can be implanted under the skin or cuticle of an animal. VIE has proved useful for individually marking fish, crustaceans, and amphibians in both field and laboratory studies and has recently been successfully trialed in laboratory populations of worms and fly larvae. We trialed VIE in the single-piece nesting termite , a small hemimetabolous insect.We found that there was no effect of VIE on survival and that marks persisted following molting. However, we found some evidence that marked termites performed less allogrooming and trophallaxis than controls, although effect sizes were very small.Our study suggests that VIE is an effective technique for marking small hemimetabolous insects like termites but we advocate that caution is applied, particularly when behavioral observation is important.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.fn2z34tv3

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 13;106(41):17452-6 [PMID: 19805058]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 7;279(1738):2662-71 [PMID: 22398169]
  3. Insects. 2017 Jun 09;8(2): [PMID: 28598375]
  4. J Econ Entomol. 2006 Dec;99(6):2110-5 [PMID: 17195680]
  5. Insectes Soc. 2009 Jul;56(2):203-211 [PMID: 19568314]
  6. Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 4;17(23):R995-9 [PMID: 18054770]
  7. J Insect Sci. 2008;8:1-11 [PMID: 20233076]
  8. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:511-43 [PMID: 11112178]
  9. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):999-1012 [PMID: 9344452]
  10. Front Zool. 2008 Sep 29;5:15 [PMID: 18822181]
  11. Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 18;11(18):12834-12844 [PMID: 34594542]
  12. Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 02;6:32666 [PMID: 27585907]
  13. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Oct;25(5):1339-1355 [PMID: 30264189]
  14. J Invertebr Pathol. 2007 May;95(1):17-25 [PMID: 17241640]
  15. Insects. 2013 Nov 04;4(4):609-30 [PMID: 26462526]
  16. Annu Rev Entomol. 2016;61:297-316 [PMID: 26667274]
  17. Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(6):1257-66 [PMID: 17391411]
  18. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):13246 [PMID: 31519955]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0markingVIEinsectssmallindividualimplantelastomerhemimetaboloustermitesstudiesanimalpopulationsindividualsmarkslaboratorytrialedtermitefoundeffectvisibleAdvancesmethodsfacilitateddetailedbehaviorallowtrackingtimespaceHemimetabolousrepresentingwiderangecommonlyusedmodelorganismspresentuniquechallengegenerallysmall-bodiedalsomoltthroughoutdevelopmentmeaningtraditionalsurfacepersistentVisibleofferspotentialsolutionamountsinertpolymercanimplantedskincuticleprovedusefulindividuallyfishcrustaceansamphibiansfieldrecentlysuccessfullywormsflylarvaesingle-piecenestinginsectWesurvivalpersistedfollowingmoltingHoweverevidencemarkedperformedlessallogroomingtrophallaxiscontrolsalthoughsizesOurstudysuggestseffectivetechniquelikeadvocatecautionappliedparticularlybehavioralobservationimportantMarkingmolts:evaluationpermanentlymarklowerspeciessocial

Similar Articles

Cited By