The role of motivated science reception and numeracy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fabian Hutmacher, Regina Reichardt, Markus Appel
Author Information
  1. Fabian Hutmacher: University of Würzburg, Germany. ORCID
  2. Regina Reichardt: University of Regensburg, Germany.
  3. Markus Appel: University of Würzburg, Germany.

Abstract

The successful management of the COVID-19 pandemic depends on individuals accepting the current state of research and adhering to the preventive behaviors that follow from it. However, the processing of scientific results is not always rational, but influenced by prior attitudes as well as the ability to understand statistical data. Against this background, this study investigated the role of motivated reasoning and numeracy in the context of the current pandemic. To this end, participants ( = 417; US sample) evaluated two fictitious studies, one indicating that mask mandates in schools are an effective intervention to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and one indicating that mask mandates in schools are counterproductive. Participants evaluated the studies in line with their prior attitude toward mask mandates. In addition, higher numeracy was associated with decreased bias, demonstrating that the ability to reason with numbers can lead to more accurate processing of statistical information.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  2. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 03;10(2):e0117476 [PMID: 25646725]
  3. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007 Nov;8(2):53-96 [PMID: 26161749]
  4. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):87-90 [PMID: 19197308]
  5. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):292-303 [PMID: 30836901]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356 [PMID: 32967786]
  7. Span J Psychol. 2019 Mar 20;22:E10 [PMID: 30892170]
  8. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):186-189 [PMID: 33024333]
  9. Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104375 [PMID: 32592890]
  10. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542 [PMID: 32485289]
  11. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:327-351 [PMID: 27618943]
  12. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):677-687 [PMID: 32581299]
  13. Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234 [PMID: 32052694]
  14. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):273-291 [PMID: 29851554]
  15. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Dec;42(12):1723-1735 [PMID: 27856727]
  16. Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73 [PMID: 19883143]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9587-9592 [PMID: 28827344]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4): [PMID: 33431650]
  19. Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;39(8):721-730 [PMID: 32496078]
  20. Am Psychol. 2017 Jul-Aug;72(5):459-473 [PMID: 28726454]
  21. Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e249-e250 [PMID: 32302535]
  22. Risk Anal. 2004 Oct;24(5):1337-47 [PMID: 15563299]
  23. Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7816):346-348 [PMID: 32620883]
  24. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):28-38 [PMID: 33230283]
  25. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1270-1285 [PMID: 32864837]
  26. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Apr;19(4):310-5 [PMID: 15061739]
  27. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1966-8 [PMID: 18535541]
  28. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):386-91 [PMID: 19217741]
  29. Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104768 [PMID: 34051421]
  30. Am Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(5):631-643 [PMID: 32437181]
  31. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197 [PMID: 33139897]
  32. Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):501-11 [PMID: 25943579]
  33. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1303-1312 [PMID: 33199859]
  34. Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2196-202 [PMID: 19833983]
  35. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Sep;69(3):408-19 [PMID: 7562388]
  36. J Behav Decis Mak. 2013 Apr;26(2):198-212 [PMID: 32313367]
  37. Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98 [PMID: 2270237]
  38. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jun;150(6):1095-1114 [PMID: 33119359]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
Humans
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
Schools