What Factors Are Most Closely Associated With Mood Disorders in Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional Study Based on 1,771 Adolescents in Shandong Province, China.

Ziyuan Ren, Yaodong Xin, Zhonglin Wang, Dexiang Liu, Roger C M Ho, Cyrus S H Ho
Author Information
  1. Ziyuan Ren: Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  2. Yaodong Xin: School of Statistics and Management Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
  3. Zhonglin Wang: School of Physical Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  4. Dexiang Liu: Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  5. Roger C M Ho: Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  6. Cyrus S H Ho: Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

COVID-19 has been proven to harm adolescents' mental health, and several psychological influence factors have been proposed. However, the importance of these factors in the development of mood disorders in adolescents during the pandemic still eludes researchers, and practical strategies for mental health education are limited. We constructed a sample of 1,771 adolescents from three junior high middle schools, three senior high middle schools, and three independent universities in Shandong province, China. The sample stratification was set as 5:4:3 for adolescent aged from 12 - 15, 15 - 18, 18 - 19. We examined the subjects' anxiety, depression, psychological resilience, perceived social support, coping strategies, subjective social/school status, screen time, and sleep quality with suitable psychological scales. We chose four widely used classification models-k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT), and a combination of the GBDT and LR (GBDT + LR)-to construct machine learning models, and we utilized the Shapley additive explanations value (SHAP) to measure how the features affected the dependent variables. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to evaluate the performance of the models. The current rates of occurrence of symptoms of anxiety and depression were 28.3 and 30.8% among the participants. The descriptive and univariate analyses showed that all of the factors included were statistically related to mood disorders. Among the four machine learning algorithms, the GBDT+LR algorithm achieved the best performance for anxiety and depression with average AUC values of 0.819 and 0.857. We found that the poor sleep quality was the most significant risk factor for mood disorders among Chinese adolescents. In addition, according to the feature importance (SHAP) of the psychological factors, we proposed a five-step mental health education strategy to be used during the COVID-19 pandemic (sleep quality-resilience-coping strategy-social support-perceived social status). In this study, we performed a cross-sectional investigation to examine the psychological impact of COVID-19 on adolescents. We applied machine learning algorithms to quantify the importance of each factor. In addition, we proposed a five-step mental health education strategy for school psychologists.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  2. Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67 [PMID: 32607472]
  3. Sleep. 2016 Mar 01;39(3):687-98 [PMID: 26612392]
  4. Community Ment Health J. 2020 Feb;56(2):280-286 [PMID: 31571085]
  5. Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1453-1463 [PMID: 28402827]
  6. J Radiat Res. 2018 Apr 1;59(suppl_2):ii108-ii113 [PMID: 29668971]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):969-990 [PMID: 27416139]
  8. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(6):111 [PMID: 27127764]
  9. Psychol Med. 2004 Oct;34(7):1197-204 [PMID: 15697046]
  10. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025591 [PMID: 33095252]
  11. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247333 [PMID: 33661914]
  12. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;23(2):127-30 [PMID: 20087188]
  13. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;6(3):211-224 [PMID: 30792114]
  14. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;12(3):e12381 [PMID: 32011101]
  15. J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Feb;44(2):405-18 [PMID: 25204836]
  16. World Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;6(3):168-76 [PMID: 18188442]
  17. J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:84-89 [PMID: 32697720]
  18. J Adolesc. 2016 Aug;51:41-9 [PMID: 27294324]
  19. Inf Sci (N Y). 2021 Jun;561:211-229 [PMID: 33612854]
  20. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(2):180-90 [PMID: 24889207]
  21. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Nov;22(11):714-723 [PMID: 31621411]
  22. Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;62:28-29 [PMID: 31509791]
  23. Can J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;65(10):701-709 [PMID: 32662303]
  24. Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;22(6):339-46 [PMID: 17227706]
  25. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):992-1003 [PMID: 3712234]
  26. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 29;12:641806 [PMID: 33995195]
  27. Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868 [PMID: 32291278]
  28. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 15;261:211-220 [PMID: 31654919]
  29. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):345-59 [PMID: 20633738]
  30. Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E31 [PMID: 11483841]
  31. Prev Med. 2015 Apr;73:133-8 [PMID: 25657166]
  32. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Nov;94:179-195 [PMID: 30201220]
  33. Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648 [PMID: 25468152]
  34. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Oct 1;45(9):1016-1026 [PMID: 32885231]
  35. Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):993-998 [PMID: 33864052]
  36. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 26;16(3): [PMID: 30691096]
  37. ISA Trans. 2020 May;100:210-220 [PMID: 31812248]
  38. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):225-31 [PMID: 23449622]
  39. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1074-1094 [PMID: 32666713]
  40. CMAJ. 2004 Mar 2;170(5):811-2 [PMID: 14993176]
  41. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):441-448 [PMID: 31806473]
  42. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;29(6):749-758 [PMID: 32363492]
  43. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 16;18(1):131 [PMID: 29769121]
  44. Child Dev. 2002 Mar-Apr;73(2):405-17 [PMID: 11949899]
  45. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82 [PMID: 12964174]
  46. Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e701-7 [PMID: 19336360]
  47. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Oct;64(5):499-504 [PMID: 20923429]
  48. J Med Syst. 2018 Apr 3;42(5):88 [PMID: 29610979]
  49. Eur J Integr Med. 2021 Jun;44:101323 [PMID: 33723493]
  50. BMJ. 2009 Jul 02;339:b2651 [PMID: 19574308]
  51. Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):611 [PMID: 30782327]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19psychologicaladolescentsmentalhealthfactorsmooddisorderssleepGBDTproposedimportanceeducationthree-anxietydepressionqualityusedmachinelearningSHAPpandemicstrategiessample1771highmiddleschoolsShandongChina1518resiliencesocialstatusfourLRmodelsvalueAUCperformanceamongalgorithms0factoradditionfive-stepstrategyAdolescentsprovenharmadolescents'severalinfluenceHoweverdevelopmentstilleludesresearcherspracticallimitedconstructedjuniorseniorindependentuniversitiesprovincestratificationset5:4:3adolescentaged1219examinedsubjects'perceivedsupportcopingsubjectivesocial/schoolscreentimesuitablescaleschosewidelyclassificationmodels-k-nearestneighborslogisticregressiongradient-boosteddecisiontreecombination+-toconstructutilizedShapleyadditiveexplanationsmeasurefeaturesaffecteddependentvariablesareacurvereceiveroperatingcharacteristicROCcurvesevaluatecurrentratesoccurrencesymptoms283308%participantsdescriptiveunivariateanalysesshowedincludedstatisticallyrelatedAmongGBDT+LRalgorithmachievedbestaveragevalues819857foundpoorsignificantriskChineseaccordingfeaturequality-resilience-copingstrategy-socialsupport-perceivedstudyperformedcross-sectionalinvestigationexamineimpactappliedquantifyschoolpsychologistsFactorsCloselyAssociatedMoodDisordersPandemic?Cross-SectionalStudyBasedProvince

Similar Articles

Cited By