Reciprocal Social Behavior and Related Social Outcomes in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Denise S Zou, Henry R Cowan, Matilda Azis, Vijay A Mittal
Author Information
  1. Denise S Zou: Northwestern University Department of Psychology. Electronic address: denisezou2015@u.northwestern.edu.
  2. Henry R Cowan: Northwestern University Department of Psychology.
  3. Matilda Azis: Northwestern University Department of Psychology.
  4. Vijay A Mittal: Northwestern University Department of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, and Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences.

Abstract

Reciprocal social behavior (RSB) deficits have been noted in formal psychotic disorders and may play a role in the clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) syndrome. The present study examined RSB deficits and clinical and social functioning correlates in 45 individuals meeting criteria for a CHR syndrome and 47 healthy comparisons (HC). Further, this study examined associations with number of friends, problematic social Internet use, and perceived social support. Compared to the HC group, the CHR group exhibited greater deficits in total RSB and in all RSB subdomains. Total RSB deficits were associated with greater negative but not positive symptom severity in the CHR group, and greater social functional impairment. RSB deficits also may have related to fewer friendships, more problematic social Internet use, and less perceived belonging and tangible social support, although relationships with Internet use and perceived social support did not survive FDR-correction. These findings provide further evidence that RSB is impaired in the CHR syndrome and suggest specific social outcomes that may be affected. Further investigations with larger, diverse samples and repeated measures can confirm these findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Schizophr Res. 2011 Sep;131(1-3):146-51 [PMID: 21458242]
  2. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;65(1):28-37 [PMID: 18180426]
  3. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;51(1):83-92 [PMID: 26698819]
  4. Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):878-887 [PMID: 28112487]
  5. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):328-35 [PMID: 25919383]
  6. Schizophr Res. 2021 May;231:32-41 [PMID: 33744683]
  7. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:99-105 [PMID: 28152400]
  8. Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):688-702 [PMID: 17440198]
  9. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;55:90-98 [PMID: 28092781]
  10. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2016 Jul 08;5:21-27 [PMID: 28740813]
  11. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jan;247:345-351 [PMID: 27987484]
  12. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 Aug;100(2):105-18 [PMID: 10480196]
  13. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 May;88(1):68-82 [PMID: 15093726]
  14. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1995 Dec;183(12):762-7 [PMID: 8522938]
  15. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep 1;6(5):721-734 [PMID: 30319928]
  16. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 29;18(1):156 [PMID: 29843662]
  17. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1204-15 [PMID: 24375457]
  18. Schizophr Res. 2013 Nov;150(2-3):498-504 [PMID: 24055202]
  19. Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):28-34 [PMID: 25749019]
  20. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):166-78 [PMID: 16207892]
  21. Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 Pt 1):1187-97 [PMID: 24229557]
  22. Schizophr Bull. 2021 Jul 27;: [PMID: 34313767]
  23. World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):322-32 [PMID: 26407788]
  24. Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):179-84 [PMID: 20570111]
  25. Schizophr Bull. 2021 Jan 23;47(1):54-63 [PMID: 32955097]
  26. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):944-50 [PMID: 22277583]
  27. J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:95-101 [PMID: 27424062]
  28. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 21;10:78 [PMID: 30846948]
  29. Autism Res. 2008 Dec;1(6):354-63 [PMID: 19360690]
  30. Dev Psychopathol. 2020 May;32(2):559-572 [PMID: 31064575]
  31. Schizophr Res. 2015 Dec;169(1-3):204-208 [PMID: 26530628]
  32. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 May;128(4):341-351 [PMID: 30869926]
  33. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun;22(2):147-50 [PMID: 23098565]
  34. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):107-20 [PMID: 23165428]
  35. Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):123-33 [PMID: 15015679]
  36. JAMA. 1997 Jun 25;277(24):1940-4 [PMID: 9200634]
  37. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun;22(2):131-46 [PMID: 22831843]
  38. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 11;11:548 [PMID: 32595540]
  39. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  40. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000 Feb;21(1):2-11 [PMID: 10706343]
  41. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;7(3):261-9 [PMID: 22925309]
  42. J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):837-51 [PMID: 20926127]
  43. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Mar 06;14:622-628 [PMID: 28348953]
  44. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Feb;196(2):95-9 [PMID: 18277216]

Grants

  1. R01 MH094650/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH112545/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R21 MH103231/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. R33 MH103231/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Friends
Humans
Psychotic Disorders
Social Adjustment
Social Behavior
Social Support

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialRSBdeficitsCHRInternetusemayclinicalsyndromeproblematicperceivedsupportgroupgreaterReciprocalbehaviorpsychosisstudyexaminedfunctioningHCfriendsnegativefindingsSocialnotedformalpsychoticdisordersplayrolehigh-riskpresentcorrelates45individualsmeetingcriteria47healthycomparisonsassociationsnumberComparedexhibitedtotalsubdomainsTotalassociatedpositivesymptomseverityfunctionalimpairmentalsorelatedfewerfriendshipslessbelongingtangiblealthoughrelationshipssurviveFDR-correctionprovideevidenceimpairedsuggestspecificoutcomesaffectedinvestigationslargerdiversesamplesrepeatedmeasurescanconfirmBehaviorRelatedOutcomesIndividualsClinicalHighRiskPsychosishighrisksymptomsreciprocal

Similar Articles

Cited By