Impact of Inadequate Number of Lymph Nodes Examined on Survival in Stage II Colon Cancer.

Qi Wu, Zhiyuan Zhang, Yijiao Chen, Jiang Chang, Yudong Jiang, Dexiang Zhu, Ye Wei
Author Information
  1. Qi Wu: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  2. Zhiyuan Zhang: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  3. Yijiao Chen: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  4. Jiang Chang: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  5. Yudong Jiang: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  6. Dexiang Zhu: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  7. Ye Wei: Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate number of lymph nodes examined was not uncommon. We aimed to assess the clinical role of inadequate number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colon cancer.
METHODS: The cancer data used in our study were obtained from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) program. Using the chi-square test, all the variables obtained in our study were compared based on whether patients had enough (≥12) lymph nodes examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS) analysis, and log-rank test was applied to compare different N stages with the total number of lymph nodes examined. Multivariate analysis was carried out by creating a Cox proportional hazard model to assess the prognostic roles of different variables.
RESULTS: In total, 80,296 stage II/III colon cancer patients were recruited for our study. N0 stage with <8 lymph nodes examined would present with a worse prognosis compared to N1 stage (5-year OS rates, 51.6% vs. 57.1%, < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that OS of N0 stage with <8 lymph nodes examined was similar to that of N1 stage after adjusting for other recognized prognostic factors [hazard ratios (HRs) = 1.051, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.014-1.090, = 0.018].
CONCLUSIONS: N0 stage with less than eight lymph nodes examined in stage II colon cancer presented with no better OS compared to that of N1 stage. Stage II colon cancer with less than eight lymph nodes examined needed to be given greater emphasis in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):89 [PMID: 29970122]
  2. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):1603-1612 [PMID: 30186378]
  3. Br J Surg. 1989 Nov;76(11):1165-7 [PMID: 2688803]
  4. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10):995-1000 [PMID: 19555384]
  5. Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;50(4):1149-1163 [PMID: 29216709]
  6. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi64-72 [PMID: 24078664]
  7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;25(7):1980-1985 [PMID: 29675762]
  8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;36(5):959-969 [PMID: 33174134]
  9. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Feb;98:63-70 [PMID: 31129171]
  10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Apr 18;93(8):583-96 [PMID: 11309435]
  11. Int J Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;142(7):1480-1489 [PMID: 29159866]
  12. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Sep;55(9):1002-7 [PMID: 22874609]
  13. Colorectal Dis. 2004 Sep;6(5):356-61 [PMID: 15335370]
  14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;16(3):585-93 [PMID: 19116751]
  15. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jan;41(2):272-9 [PMID: 15661553]
  16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4 [PMID: 20180029]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3381-8 [PMID: 21788561]
  18. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov;49(11):1673-83 [PMID: 17019656]
  19. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Mar 21;99(6):433-41 [PMID: 17374833]
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424 [PMID: 30207593]
  21. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):404-417 [PMID: 31759062]
  22. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Apr;35(4):623-631 [PMID: 31996986]
  23. World J Surg. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-9 [PMID: 11865379]
  24. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):6 [PMID: 32037496]
  25. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Oct;33(10):1547-53 [PMID: 19661781]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stagelymphnodesexaminedcancerIIcolonnumberOSstudycomparedanalysisN0N1=InadequateassessclinicalusedobtainedtestvariablespatientssurvivaldifferenttotalMultivariateprognostic<801lesseightStageBACKGROUND:uncommonaimedroleinadequateMETHODS:dataSEERSurveillanceEpidemiologyEndResultsprogramUsingchi-squarebasedwhetherenough≥12Kaplan-Meieroveralllog-rankappliedcompareNstagescarriedcreatingCoxproportionalhazardmodelrolesRESULTS:80296II/IIIrecruitedpresentworseprognosis5-yearrates516%vs571%<001analysesindicatedsimilaradjustingrecognizedfactors[hazardratiosHRs05195%confidenceintervalsCIs014-1090018]CONCLUSIONS:presentedbetterneededgivengreateremphasispracticeImpactNumberLymphNodesExaminedSurvivalColonCancerretrospective

Similar Articles

Cited By