Pilot study of a well-being app to support New Zealand young people during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Anna Serlachius, Anna Boggiss, David Lim, Kiralee Schache, Kate Wallace-Boyd, Jennifer Brenton-Peters, Elise Buttenshaw, Stephanie Chadd, Alana Cavadino, Nicholas Cao, Eva Morunga, Hiran Thabrew
Author Information
  1. Anna Serlachius: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  2. Anna Boggiss: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  3. David Lim: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  4. Kiralee Schache: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  5. Kate Wallace-Boyd: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  6. Jennifer Brenton-Peters: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  7. Elise Buttenshaw: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  8. Stephanie Chadd: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  9. Alana Cavadino: Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  10. Nicholas Cao: Tamaki Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
  11. Eva Morunga: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  12. Hiran Thabrew: Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-being apps represent a promising and scalable approach for improving mental health outcomes in youth, especially during a global pandemic when access to face-to-face interventions may be limited. (meaning 7 in the New Zealand Māori language Te Reo) is a newly developed well-being app with 7 modules that support young people to learn and practice evidence-based coping skills, including relaxation, mindfulness, self-compassion, and goal-setting.
OBJECTIVE: During this pilot, we explored the acceptability, usability, and preliminary efficacy of before refining the app for a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
METHODS: We recruited 20 New Zealand young people aged 16-25 years via social media to trial the first prototype of the app over 6 weeks. Within-group differences from baseline to 2- and 6-weeks post intervention in self-reported well-being, depression, anxiety, stress, self-compassion, optimism and sleep quality were evaluated using repeated-measures ANOVA. A further 21 participants aged 16-30 years were recruited to participate in 4 focus groups to give feedback on the app's usability and cultural acceptability. Feedback was analysed using directed content analysis.
RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in anxiety (p = 0.024) and stress (p = 0.017) were observed from baseline to 2-weeks post intervention. Improvements in well-being (p = 0.021), depression (p = 0.031), anxiety (p = 0.005), and stress (p = 0.004) were also observed from baseline to 6-weeks. No statistically significant changes were seen in self-compassion, optimism, or sleep quality. Effect sizes (partial ηs) ranged from 0.25 (depression) to 0.42 (stress). Qualitative feedback comprised of five key themes, namely: factors affecting engagement, issues with functionality, preferences regarding aesthetics, effectiveness and adverse effects, and cultural acceptability.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that may be an effective app for improving multiple dimensions of young people's well-being. Modifications to the look and feel, cultural content, and onboarding have been undertaken based on the qualitative feedback, and an RCT is currently underway.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-78 [PMID: 7815302]
  2. World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):287-298 [PMID: 28941113]
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 25;19(5):e176 [PMID: 28546138]
  4. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  5. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5 [PMID: 21584907]
  6. Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(2):208-228 [PMID: 28641609]
  7. Diabet Med. 2020 Aug;37(8):1352-1356 [PMID: 31315150]
  8. Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;218(6):326-333 [PMID: 33081860]
  9. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:40-48 [PMID: 32298802]
  10. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct;79(5):629-42 [PMID: 21744945]
  11. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892 [PMID: 32707037]
  12. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119895 [PMID: 25786025]
  13. Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jul;53(7):1155-1157 [PMID: 32449523]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  15. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317 [PMID: 32442160]
  16. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Oct 12;3(2):e23057 [PMID: 33001834]
  17. Community Ment Health J. 2020 Oct;56(7):1202-1203 [PMID: 32734311]
  18. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  19. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;41(3):213-21 [PMID: 17464702]
  20. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 27;24:100442 [PMID: 32775969]
  21. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2013 Sep;7(3):160 [PMID: 25030254]
  22. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2009 Summer;11(3):137-44 [PMID: 20437844]
  23. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:382-386 [PMID: 28666244]
  24. J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:65-71 [PMID: 25038293]
  25. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Nov;46(7):718-725 [PMID: 29017402]
  26. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 8;9(10):e23716 [PMID: 32991303]
  27. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1535-1547 [PMID: 34002052]
  28. Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1129-1144 [PMID: 27853963]
  29. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):631-652 [PMID: 33875837]
  30. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 06;20(6):e199 [PMID: 29875089]
  31. Mindfulness (N Y). 2016 Mar 1;7(2):479-492 [PMID: 27110301]
  32. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Nov 15;14(11):1849-1857 [PMID: 30373688]
  33. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Apr;67:1-18 [PMID: 25727678]
  34. J Contemp Psychother. 2020;50(4):243-250 [PMID: 32836375]
  35. AIDS Behav. 2020 Aug;24(8):2239-2243 [PMID: 32306214]
  36. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74 [PMID: 18388841]
  37. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 22;21(7):e12869 [PMID: 31333198]
  38. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Sep;17(9):591-602 [PMID: 25007383]
  39. BMJ. 2012 Apr 18;344:e2598 [PMID: 22517917]
  40. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):899-913 [PMID: 32683737]
  41. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jun;21(6):1157-69 [PMID: 25213114]
  42. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1254-1270.e5 [PMID: 25457924]
  43. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72 [PMID: 27287964]
  44. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63 [PMID: 18042300]
  45. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):634-640 [PMID: 32540024]
  46. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Feb 8;8(2):e26617 [PMID: 33498011]
  47. J Adolesc. 2014 Feb;37(2):97-101 [PMID: 24439615]
  48. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Jun 25;3(1):e20049 [PMID: 32540841]
  49. BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m1669 [PMID: 32345583]
  50. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;29(4):227-234A [PMID: 29069107]
  51. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e22817 [PMID: 32897868]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0p = 0well-beingappyoungstressNewZealandpeopleself-compassionacceptabilitybaselinedepressionanxietyfeedbackculturalWell-beingappsimprovinghealthpandemicmay7supportskillsusabilitypreliminarytrialRCTrecruitedaged6-weekspostinterventionoptimismsleepqualityusingcontentsignificantobserved0COVID-19BACKGROUND:representpromisingscalableapproachmentaloutcomesyouthespeciallyglobalaccessface-to-faceinterventionslimitedmeaningMāorilanguageTeReonewlydevelopedmoduleslearnpracticeevidence-basedcopingincludingrelaxationmindfulnessgoal-settingOBJECTIVE:pilotexploredefficacyrefiningrandomizedcontrolledMETHODS:2016-25 yearsviasocialmediafirstprototype6 weeksWithin-groupdifferences2-self-reportedevaluatedrepeated-measuresANOVA21participants16-30 yearsparticipate4focusgroupsgiveapp'sFeedbackanalyseddirectedanalysisRESULTS:Statisticallyimprovements0240172-weeksImprovements021031005004alsostatisticallychangesseenEffectsizespartialηsranged2542Qualitativecomprisedfivekeythemesnamely:factorsaffectingengagementissuesfunctionalitypreferencesregardingaestheticseffectivenessadverseeffectsCONCLUSIONS:resultssuggesteffectivemultipledimensionspeople'sModificationslookfeelonboardingundertakenbasedqualitativecurrentlyunderwayPilotstudyAdolescentCopingMentalMobilePandemicYoungadultmHealth

Similar Articles

Cited By