Psychological, social and cognitive resources and the mental wellbeing of the poor.

Deborah A Cobb-Clark, Nathan Kettlewell
Author Information
  1. Deborah A Cobb-Clark: School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  2. Nathan Kettlewell: ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

Our study takes advantage of unique data to quantify deficits in the psychosocial and cognitive resources of an extremely vulnerable subpopulation-those experiencing housing vulnerability-in an advanced, high-income country (Australia). Groups such as these are often impossible to study using nationally representative data sources because they make up a small share of the overall population. We show that those experiencing housing vulnerability sleep less well, have more limited cognitive functioning, and less social capital than do those in the general population. They are also less emotionally stable, less conscientious, more external, and more risk tolerant. Collectively, these deficits in psychosocial and cognitive resources account for between 24-42% of their reduced life satisfaction and their increased mental distress and loneliness. These traits also account for a large proportion of the gap in mental wellbeing across different levels of housing vulnerability.

References

  1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:146-73 [PMID: 20201872]
  2. J R Soc Med. 2007 Jan;100(1):46-50 [PMID: 17197688]
  3. Nat Hum Behav. 2016;1: [PMID: 28706997]
  4. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 09;12:E109 [PMID: 26160295]
  5. Science. 2012 Nov 2;338(6107):682-5 [PMID: 23118192]
  6. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:131-136 [PMID: 28923664]
  7. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2005 Feb;43(2):40-7 [PMID: 15745239]
  8. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(3):332-44 [PMID: 25058303]
  9. Sleep. 2013 Nov 01;36(11):1669-76 [PMID: 24179300]
  10. Science. 2013 Aug 30;341(6149):976-80 [PMID: 23990553]
  11. J Econ Behav Organ. 2016 Feb;122:88-109 [PMID: 28713185]
  12. Public Health Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):12-23 [PMID: 14692985]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;94(6):1048-61 [PMID: 18505317]
  14. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:511-35 [PMID: 21091190]
  15. Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):862-7 [PMID: 24855262]
  16. J Urban Health. 2009 Sep;86(5):791-803 [PMID: 19629703]
  17. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:210-25 [PMID: 10681899]
  18. Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1409-19 [PMID: 23923504]
  19. Am Psychol. 1991 Nov;46(11):1219-25 [PMID: 1772159]
  20. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jun;42(6):583-96 [PMID: 9226606]
  21. Labour Econ. 2012 Aug 1;19(4):451-464 [PMID: 23559694]
  22. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):99-109 [PMID: 11392870]
  23. J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):135-54 [PMID: 30203933]
  24. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 [PMID: 12214795]

MeSH Term

Adult
Australia
Cognition
Humans
Loneliness
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Poverty
Psychological Distress
Sleep
Social Capital

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitivelessresourceshousingmentalstudydatadeficitspsychosocialexperiencingpopulationvulnerabilitysocialalsoaccountwellbeingtakesadvantageuniquequantifyextremelyvulnerablesubpopulation-thosevulnerability-inadvancedhigh-incomecountryAustraliaGroupsoftenimpossibleusingnationallyrepresentativesourcesmakesmallshareoverallshowsleepwelllimitedfunctioningcapitalgeneralemotionallystableconscientiousexternalrisktolerantCollectively24-42%reducedlifesatisfactionincreaseddistresslonelinesstraitslargeproportiongapacrossdifferentlevelsPsychologicalpoor

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)