Technology-Supported Guidance Model to Support the Development of Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Protocol of an Exploratory, Flexible Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Jaroslav Zlamal, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Mariann Fossum, Simen Alexander Steindal, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes
Author Information
  1. Jaroslav Zlamal: Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  2. Edith Roth Gjevjon: Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  3. Mariann Fossum: Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway. ORCID
  4. Simen Alexander Steindal: Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  5. Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes: Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is an essential set of skills in nursing education, and nursing education therefore needs a sharper focus on effective ways to support the development of these skills, especially through the implementation of technological tools in nursing education.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study protocol is to assess the feasibility of a technology-supported guidance model grounded in the metacognition theory for nursing students in clinical practice.
METHODS: Both quantitative (research questionnaires) and qualitative (focus group interviews) approaches will be used to collect data for a feasibility study with an exploratory, flexible mixed methods design to test a newly developed intervention in clinical practice.
RESULTS: The intervention development was completed in December 2020. The intervention will be tested in 3 independent nursing homes in Norway.
CONCLUSIONS: By determining the feasibility of a technology-supported guidance model for nursing students in clinical practice, the results will provide information on the acceptability of the intervention and the suitability of the outcome measures and data collection strategy. They will also identify the causes of dropout and obstacles to retention and adherence.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/31646.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:166-74 [PMID: 26898705]
  2. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Mar;39(3):259-67 [PMID: 11864649]
  3. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:93-99 [PMID: 29902742]
  4. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 May 28;4:104 [PMID: 29854417]
  5. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;67(2):171-6 [PMID: 23433271]
  6. J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1319-1331 [PMID: 29444335]
  7. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205 [PMID: 26978655]
  8. Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):576-581 [PMID: 28472376]
  9. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 3;5:120 [PMID: 31700654]
  10. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537 [PMID: 28213598]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Nov;34(11):1357-60 [PMID: 24713126]
  12. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e25126 [PMID: 33464214]
  13. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687 [PMID: 24609605]
  14. Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21 [PMID: 19646171]
  15. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 20;13:104 [PMID: 23961782]
  16. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Nov;30(8):809-15 [PMID: 20409620]
  17. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12 [PMID: 15189396]
  18. BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586 [PMID: 23303884]
  19. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Aug;45(8):1233-7 [PMID: 17803996]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 May;34(5):809-14 [PMID: 24018356]
  21. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:82-86 [PMID: 28033551]
  22. Aust Crit Care. 2009 May;22(2):93-7 [PMID: 19150245]
  23. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157 [PMID: 29403314]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nursingeducationfeasibilityclinicalpracticewillinterventionguidancemodelCriticalthinkingskillsfocusdevelopmentstudytechnology-supportedstudentsdataBACKGROUND:essentialsetthereforeneedssharpereffectivewayssupportespeciallyimplementationtechnologicaltoolsOBJECTIVE:aimprotocolassessgroundedmetacognitiontheoryMETHODS:quantitativeresearchquestionnairesqualitativegroupinterviewsapproachesusedcollectexploratoryflexiblemixedmethodsdesigntestnewlydevelopedRESULTS:completedDecember2020tested3independenthomesNorwayCONCLUSIONS:determiningresultsprovideinformationacceptabilitysuitabilityoutcomemeasurescollectionstrategyalsoidentifycausesdropoutobstaclesretentionadherenceINTERNATIONALREGISTEREDREPORTIDENTIFIERIRRID:DERR1-102196/31646Technology-SupportedGuidanceModelSupportDevelopmentThinkingAmongUndergraduateNursingStudentsClinicalPractice:ProtocolExploratoryFlexibleMixedMethodsFeasibilityStudycriticalmedicaltechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By