Couples undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model of dyadic adjustment, attachment, and body-image avoidance.

Silvia Salcuni, Elisa Mancinelli, Anna Muneratti, Antonella Grillo, Chiara Alessi, Antonino Guglielmino, Livio Finos
Author Information
  1. Silvia Salcuni: Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  2. Elisa Mancinelli: Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. ORCID
  3. Anna Muneratti: Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  4. Antonella Grillo: U.M.R. Unità di Medicina della Riproduzione, Catania, Italy.
  5. Chiara Alessi: Dipartimento Strutturale Aziendale Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Padova Hospital, Padova, Italy.
  6. Antonino Guglielmino: U.M.R. Unità di Medicina della Riproduzione, Catania, Italy.
  7. Livio Finos: Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Abstract

The aim is to assess the commonalities and interdependence referred to body-image avoidance among 118 couples newly introduced to first-level assisted reproductive techniques. Results showed non-clinical functioning levels, and partners showed a correlated, yet low, dyadic adjustment. The couple-effect was modeled through an Actor Partner Interdependence Model. For both partners, dyadic adjustment's actor-effect associates with body-image avoidance. Moreover, psychological symptoms' actor-effect associate to body-image avoidance, resulting significantly more influential than the partner-effect. Only for males, alexithymia's actor-effect was significant. To conclude, partners' functioning is quite specular yet not interdependent, as they do not show a couple-as-a-unit modality of functioning. Clinical implications are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1044-7 [PMID: 22386844]
  2. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;45(3):563-574 [PMID: 30092929]
  3. Psychiatr Danub. 2019 Dec;31(4):473-477 [PMID: 31698404]
  4. Stress Health. 2020 Dec;36(5):654-662 [PMID: 32472734]
  5. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(2):125-35 [PMID: 19319694]
  6. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):306 [PMID: 33717249]
  7. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32 [PMID: 8126686]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):350-65 [PMID: 10707340]
  9. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jun;36(6):646-657 [PMID: 29622404]
  10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):185-9 [PMID: 23298895]
  11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Oct;34(10):1307-1315 [PMID: 28733802]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2168-76 [PMID: 23748487]
  13. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):575-88 [PMID: 21493634]
  14. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;13(1):66-71 [PMID: 30644247]
  15. Women Health. 2016;56(3):312-25 [PMID: 26361792]
  16. Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 02;6:1279 [PMID: 26388799]
  17. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2007 Winter;18(4):311-22 [PMID: 18066722]
  18. Fertil Steril. 1990 Nov;54(5):879-86 [PMID: 2226921]
  19. Eat Behav. 2007 Aug;8(3):296-304 [PMID: 17606227]
  20. J Reprod Infertil. 2011 Oct;12(4):295-8 [PMID: 23926517]
  21. Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:839 [PMID: 28588541]
  22. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019 Mar;23(1):117-127 [PMID: 31034178]
  23. Psychother Psychosom. 1973;22(2):255-62 [PMID: 4770536]
  24. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 25;15(2):e0229268 [PMID: 32097427]
  25. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):395-414 [PMID: 18653674]
  26. Hum Reprod. 2009 Apr;24(4):906-12 [PMID: 19106176]
  27. Health Psychol Open. 2020 Jun 26;7(1):2055102920933073 [PMID: 32637146]
  28. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017 Jun;24(2):132-143 [PMID: 28536903]
  29. J Psychosom Res. 1996 Dec;41(6):551-9 [PMID: 9032718]
  30. J Health Psychol. 2017 Oct;22(12):1563-1569 [PMID: 26929171]
  31. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 02;8(5):96-109 [PMID: 26652079]
  32. Hum Reprod. 2001 Mar;16(3):587-92 [PMID: 11228234]
  33. Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3215-25 [PMID: 22926837]
  34. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Mar;29(2):105-15 [PMID: 19167139]
  35. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Feb;19(7 Suppl 1):S51-8 [PMID: 25949252]
  36. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 07;10(1):711 [PMID: 29212545]
  37. Clin Ter. 2014;165(3):163-9 [PMID: 24999571]
  38. J Fam Psychol. 2010 Apr;24(2):156-64 [PMID: 20438191]
  39. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Nov;171(1):61-6 [PMID: 23928476]
  40. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6 [PMID: 28069012]
  41. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):338-347 [PMID: 30187521]
  42. Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):851-7 [PMID: 18314111]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0body-imageavoidancedyadicfunctioningadjustmentactor-effectassistedtechniquesshowedpartnersyetInterdependenceModelpsychologicalinterdependentattachmentaimassesscommonalitiesinterdependencereferredamong118couplesnewlyintroducedfirst-levelreproductiveResultsnon-clinicallevelscorrelatedlowcouple-effectmodeledActorPartneradjustment'sassociatesMoreoversymptoms'associateresultingsignificantlyinfluentialpartner-effectmalesalexithymia'ssignificantconcludepartners'quitespecularshowcouple-as-a-unitmodalityClinicalimplicationsdiscussedCouplesundergoingAssistedReproductiveTechniques:Actor-Partneractorpartnermodelalexithymiareproductiondistress

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)