Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effect of Cell-Free Supernatant of KCCM 202399 Isolated from Korean Fermented Food against KCTC 5458.

Jong Ha Kim, Hye Ji Jang, Na-Kyoung Lee, Hyun-Dong Paik
Author Information
  1. Jong Ha Kim: Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resource Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
  2. Hye Ji Jang: Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resource Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
  3. Na-Kyoung Lee: Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resource Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
  4. Hyun-Dong Paik: Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resource Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the antibiofilm effect of cell-free supernatant (CFS) of strains against strains. To study the antibiofilm mechanism against strains, antibacterial effects, cell surface properties (auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity), exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, and morphological changes were examined. The antibiofilm effect of KCCM 202399 CFS as morphological changes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), compared with the control treatment. Among the strains, KCCM 202399 showed the highest antibiofilm effect on KCTC 5458. The antibacterial effect of KCCM 202399 against KCTC 5458 was investigated using the deferred method (16.00 mm). The minimum inhibitory concentration of KCCM 202399 against KCTC 5458 was 25.00%. Compared with the control treatment, KCCM 202399 CFS inhibited the bacterial adhesion of KCTC 5458 by decreasing auto-aggregation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and EPS production (45.91%, 40.51%, and 67.44%, respectively). KCCM 202399 CFS inhibited and eradicated the KCTC 5458 biofilm. Therefore, these results suggest that KCCM 202399 CFS may be used to develop oral health in the probiotic industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Feb;49(2):161-4 [PMID: 14693211]
  2. J Med Microbiol. 2013 Apr;62(Pt 4):637-649 [PMID: 23329323]
  3. Biofouling. 2015;31(7):555-63 [PMID: 26293974]
  4. Front Biosci. 2004 May 01;9:1267-77 [PMID: 14977543]
  5. Amino Acids. 2020 Jan;52(1):1-14 [PMID: 31797056]
  6. Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 30;11:774 [PMID: 32425911]
  7. Microb Pathog. 2021 Aug;157:104938 [PMID: 34022360]
  8. J Endod. 2019 Mar;45(3):310-315 [PMID: 30803538]
  9. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Apr 15;161(2):331-6 [PMID: 9570124]
  10. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 23;2021:6692328 [PMID: 33860052]
  11. Braz J Microbiol. 2011 Jan;42(1):330-9 [PMID: 24031639]
  12. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2017 Apr;32(2):107-117 [PMID: 27115703]
  13. J Biotechnol. 2019 Jun 10;298:57-63 [PMID: 30986518]
  14. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192694 [PMID: 29420616]
  15. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2020 Nov;40(6):1001-1013 [PMID: 33305284]
  16. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Aug 28;29(8):1177-1183 [PMID: 31370119]
  17. BMC Microbiol. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):221 [PMID: 30577728]
  18. BMC Microbiol. 2014 Aug 14;14:197 [PMID: 25124936]
  19. Intest Res. 2019 Apr;17(2):192-201 [PMID: 30508474]
  20. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Jul 15;257:112856 [PMID: 32278760]
  21. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 30;23:4175-4181 [PMID: 28851857]
  22. J Food Sci. 2020 Jan;85(1):157-164 [PMID: 31909483]
  23. Arch Oral Biol. 2016 Oct;70:39-46 [PMID: 27318453]
  24. Microb Biotechnol. 2015 May;8(3):392-403 [PMID: 25154775]
  25. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018 Oct;31(10):1075-1082 [PMID: 30136892]
  26. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Mar 4;28(5):1521-1528 [PMID: 31695951]

MeSH Term

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacterial Adhesion
Biofilms
Dental Caries
Fermented Foods
Levilactobacillus brevis
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Probiotics
Republic of Korea
Streptococcus mutans

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0KCCM202399effectKCTC5458antibiofilmCFSstrainsantibacterialcellsurfacestudyauto-aggregationhydrophobicityEPSproductionmorphologicalchangesscanningmicroscopycontroltreatmentinhibitedaimsdeterminecell-freesupernatantmechanismeffectspropertiesexopolysaccharideexaminedevaluatedelectronSEMconfocallaserCLSMcomparedAmongshowedhighestinvestigatedusingdeferredmethod1600mmminimuminhibitoryconcentration2500%Comparedbacterialadhesiondecreasing4591%4051%6744%respectivelyeradicatedbiofilmThereforeresultssuggestmayuseddeveloporalhealthprobioticindustryAntibacterialAntibiofilmEffectCell-FreeSupernatantIsolatedKoreanFermentedFoodProbioticsStreptococcusmutans

Similar Articles

Cited By